Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
7 hours ago, Mordred said:

lol that's why I usually spend that time answering physics posts lol.

On second thought, the fact that I learned nothing is not the worst thing. I might a actually gotten more stupid which is scary.

Posted
17 hours ago, DrmDoc said:

Today I learned that fetal gene expression in the spinal cord, rather than a functional motor cortex, may be the genesis of whether we are right or left-handed.  I emphasized may because this study is base on a limited sampling ("five human fetuses).

I've often read how prenatal testosterone level is a determining factor for being left or  richt-handed. Testosterone is known to have an effect on gene expression. This fits with the fact that there are more left-handed boys  then girls.http://genetics.thetech.org/ask/ask206

Posted (edited)

Today I learned about Morgan's Wonderland.  It's a $32 million San Antonio, TX, theme and water park for special needs children inspired by Morgan and built by her father.

Edited by DrmDoc
punctuation
Posted

Today I learned about the French Pompeii.  According to CNN:

Quote

Archaeologists in France have unearthed a well-preserved ancient Roman Empire-era town, complete with mosaics and furniture left intact.

The site was apparently covered in ash after a great fire destroyed the town.

Posted

For those of you who have interest, here's a SciShow Psych link where you may learn about the 5 distinctive brainwave patterns our brain produces.  They are delta, theta, alpha, beta, and gamma.  The video also discusses a study suggesting how gamma wave exposure might influence our brain biology.  According to the host, researchers found that mice-with genetically modified light-sensitive neurons--produced "half as many plaques in their visual cortex compared to controls."  The implications of this finding in the treatment of Alzheimer could be enormous.  Enjoy!     

Posted

Today I learned about inverted river channels.

In the Late Jurassic period, a network of braided rivers flowed across the Colorado Plateau in an area about 8 kilometers (5 miles) northwest of Hanksville, Utah. The rivers cut through layers of bedrock, chiseling valleys and depositing sand and gravel on their bottoms.

Over the past 150 million years, geologic processes have reversed the area’s topography. The sandy deposits from the channel beds hardened into erosion-resistant caps of sandstone, while winds and water chewed away at the shale and claystone rocks on the river’s adjacent floodplains. Today, the shales and claystones have largely eroded and the sandy deposits that were stream channels are now sinuous ridges that rise above the landscape.https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/IOTD/view.php?id=79863

This is inverted relief. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_relief

Posted (edited)
On 8/16/2017 at 9:53 AM, Itoero said:

Today I learned about the Scanning Tunneling Microscope. A scanning tunneling microscope (STM) is an instrument for imaging surfaces at the atomic level. Its development in 1981 earned its inventors, Gerd Binnig and Heinrich Rohrer (at IBM Zürich), the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1986.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scanning_tunneling_microscope

 

Take a look at the atomic force microscope, which is a further development of that principle. One of my favorite toys.

Edited by CharonY
Posted

That's right about the time large numbers of men started wearing briefs, DrmDoc.
I just don't like 'things' flopping around, down there.

And I don't need a high sperm count anymore, anyway.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Today I learned that the cowcatcher device fitted to the front of railway locomotives to displace any objects blocking the line was invented by Charles Babbage, the same Charles Babbage who designed the first (mechanical) computer. "A well made cow-catcher could throw a  buffalo weighing 2000 lbs some 30 feet."

Source: The Historical Atlas of North American Railroads ISBN 978-0-7858-2781-8 page 44.

Prizes on offer for whomever comes up with the best "on-line" pun!

Posted
40 minutes ago, Area54 said:

A well made cow-catcher could throw a  buffalo weighing 2000 lbs some 30 feet."

 

That would not help much if the buffalo landed back on the lines. Why didn't he call it a bison-catcher?

Posted
7 minutes ago, DrKrettin said:

That would not help much if the buffalo landed back on the lines. Why didn't he call it a bison-catcher?

The angular placement of the two blades imparts a sideways motion. Unless you were unfortunate enough to hit it when negotiating a very tight bend, combined with an equally unfortunate independent velocity of the buffalo, this would be very unlikely.

Babbage was English. There are more cows in England than buffalos or bisons. As Babbage himself may have said in his Engish accent, "What's the difference between a buffalo and a bison? You can't wash your hands in a buffalo."

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Area54 said:

Today I learned that the cowcatcher device fitted to the front of railway locomotives to displace any objects blocking the line was invented by Charles Babbage, the same Charles Babbage who designed the first (mechanical) computer. "A well made cow-catcher could throw a  buffalo weighing 2000 lbs some 30 feet."

Source: The Historical Atlas of North American Railroads ISBN 978-0-7858-2781-8 page 44.

Prizes on offer for whomever comes up with the best "on-line" pun!

Shouldn't you have said " on railway-line " pun?

Edited by Tub
language

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.