Kbxer22 Posted March 28, 2017 Posted March 28, 2017 Is it the anatomical cross-section, physiologic cross-section, average muscle fiber Length, or muscle volume.
Function Posted March 28, 2017 Posted March 28, 2017 If you know that a single motor cell contraction is an all-or-nothing phenomenon, it is understandable that the force exerted is proportional to the amount of fibres that do contract. Which one of the answers is most closely related to the amount of fibres? 1
Kbxer22 Posted March 28, 2017 Author Posted March 28, 2017 I would say physiologic cross section then. I just wonder between that and muscle volume. But volume isn't more closely related I guess.
Function Posted March 28, 2017 Posted March 28, 2017 That's what I'd answer, though the difference between anatomical and physiological cross-section is not entirely clear to me. Volume, indeed: no. The only thing that differs cross-section from volume, is length. The length of a fibre and, by extension, its sarcomeres, does indeed determine the contractility of one fibre. But as mentioned before, once contracted, it's contracted. It can't be semi-contracted or contracted for 90%, 50%, ...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now