Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I am really curious why some posters are so desperate that they will create multiple accounts to keep posting, even if only suspended for a few days.

 

Do they really think that their idea is so important, it must be heard?

Do they just think that rules don't apply to them?

 

Unfortunately, the people who could answer those questions probably can't because they have been banned!

 

Should this be classified as mental illness?

Posted (edited)


 

:)

 

 

Re: Negative mass ??
http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/104310-negative-mass/#entry979213

Phi for All -- Moderator Note:
" The OP is no longer with us, mainly for his inability to provide supportive evidence. If someone wants to explore facets of this concept and has questions, start a thread in a mainstream section. If someone wants to defend the OP's assertions with supportive evidence, start a thread in Speculations."
=========================================================

:)

 


Just because a person writes science fiction books
it does not follow that this person can not be
a real accomplished mainstream scientist, right? :)
Dr. Carl Sagan is a good example. :)


Dr. Robert Forward, Ph.D. ---
http://www.enthea.org/docs/Forward-Emerging-Technologies-Future-Concepts.pdf
http://www.calphysics.org/articles/Forward1984.pdf
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_L._Forward
http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewpr.html?pid=9328




Louis Salmon Library
University of Alabama in Huntsville
Guide to the Collection of Dr. Robert Forward, Ph.D. :
http://libguides.uah.edu/ld.php?content_id=10578213



“Negative Matter Propulsion,” Dr. Robert Forward, Ph.D.
Journal of Propulsion and Power, Vol. 6, No., 1, 1990, pp. 28 - 37
https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/abs/10.2514/3.23219
https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/abs/10.2514/3.23327
https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/10.2514/6.1988-3168



I have found the math and science to support the position,
in this paper by an eminent physicist, Prof. Martin Tajmar, Ph.D. :
https://tu-dresden.de/ing/maschinenwesen/ilr/rfs/ressourcen/dateien/forschung/folder-2007-08-21-5231434330/ag_raumfahrtantriebe/JPC---Propellantless-Propulsion-with-Negative-Matter-Generated-by-Electric-Charges.pdf?lang=en



Prof. Martin Tajmar, Ph.D., the Chair of Space Systems :
https://www.ilsb.tuwien.ac.at/~tajmar/
https://tu-dresden.de/ing/maschinenwesen/ilr/rfs/die-professur/inhaber-in
https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg19225771-800-gravitys-secret/
https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0003011


:)

Edited by Propellantless Propulsion
Posted

As the immediately preceding post is about to be deleted, all I can say is: see what I mean?

 

It is a shame that he is so obsessively stuck on one track, he couldn't even post something relevant to a post that was inspired by him as the latest crazy example. Ho hum.

Posted

OK, zbigniew, before you go, why is it you keep pushing these ideas that have no support, with links that only sound like they might? Why do you keep showing up when you're asked to leave? Why do you think your ignorance of science isn't as much of a detriment to your learning as being deaf or blind would be? There's a whole lot that you don't know you don't know about science. How can you be this arrogant and ignorant at the same time?

Posted (edited)

As the immediately preceding post is about to be deleted, all I can say is: see what I mean?

 

It is a shame that he is so obsessively stuck on one track, he couldn't even post something relevant to a post that was inspired by him as the latest crazy example. Ho hum.

 

:)

 

 

just keep deleting the evidence, and you will be fine :)

 

Remember? -- " You should find science to support your position, not science fiction."

 

Phi for All -- Moderator Note:

" The OP is no longer with us, mainly for his inability to provide supportive evidence. If someone wants to explore facets of this concept and has questions, start a thread in a mainstream section. If someone wants to defend the OP's assertions with supportive evidence, start a thread in Speculations."

Edited by Propellantless Propulsion
Posted

As the immediately preceding post is about to be deleted, all I can say is: see what I mean?

 

I was posting about how sorry I feel for folks like this when he barged in again with a sockpuppet. It's like watching the Black Knight in Holy Grail insist he can beat Arthur despite having no leg to stand on. He claims he has the math to support his idea when he clearly and concisely explained how he doesn't know math.

Posted

OK, zbigniew, before you go, why is it you keep pushing these ideas?

 

 

 

 

 

why do you delete the evidence? :)

 

 

Phi for All -- Moderator Note:

" The OP is no longer with us, mainly for his inability to provide supportive evidence. If someone wants to explore facets of this concept and has questions, start a thread in a mainstream section. If someone wants to defend the OP's assertions with supportive evidence, start a thread in Speculations."

Posted

Phi for All -- Moderator Note:

" The OP is no longer with us, mainly for his inability to provide supportive evidence. If someone wants to explore facets of this concept and has questions, start a thread in a mainstream section. If someone wants to defend the OP's assertions with supportive evidence, start a thread in Speculations."

 

Well not you, you tit, you're a sockpuppet!

 

Even when given a chance, you still can't respond meaningfully. Talk, talk, talk, no evidence at all.

Posted

 

 

Words can not describe how sorry i feel for pseudo-scientists,

who keep deleting evidence, and then lie, and lie, and lie !! :)

 

 

But can you explain why you feel you need to keep creating new accounts to plug your idea?

Posted

But can you explain why you feel you need to keep creating new accounts to plug your idea?

 

Sorry, I had to boot him too. He started spamming other threads.

 

Now he gets to claim his stupid link would be the miracle that "proves" his idea is sound, but the horrible mainstream people keep deleting it (even though I left it here). I also don't think he understands that Dr Forward is a science fiction writer, and that his negative matter is purely hypothetical.

 

Sockpuppeteers are intellectually dishonest, lazy, and ignorant.

Posted

Sorry, I had to boot him too. He started spamming other threads.

 

 

Don't apologise.

 

This is a bit like trying to find out what goes on inside a black hole:

"Can you tell me what you can see?"

"It's ..."

"Oh, he's gone."

Posted

 

Sorry, I had to boot him too. He started spamming other threads.

 

Now he gets to claim his stupid link would be the miracle that "proves" his idea is sound, but the horrible mainstream people keep deleting it (even though I left it here). I also don't think he understands that Dr Forward is a science fiction writer, and that his negative matter is purely hypothetical.

 

Sockpuppeteers are intellectually dishonest, lazy, and ignorant.

Don't forget vanity.

Posted

Don't forget vanity.

 

There has to be a lot of that in order to come to a place like this challenging mainstream science, right? I'd still like to know what other highly technical fields people feel free to criticize without knowing very much about it. Maybe I should head over to the airport and tell the air traffic controllers about my new ideas for landing more planes. Most of those guys probably aren't pilots, right, so my lack of flight time shouldn't be a drawback (I'm not a pilot but I've flown). In fact, I'm not bogged down by all their protocols and experience, so I might even come up with something nobody has thought of.

 

Right off the top of my head, I think we should turn up the AC in the flight tower. Air traffic controllers should never sweat, because it makes pilots nervous, and it might get in the controllers eyes, or short out valuable electronics. See how easy that was? I can't believe all those "professional" controllers never came up with that. Really, it's sort of my duty as an air traffic controller to save all those people who would otherwise die without my insights and intuition. And if you don't agree and kick me out, I'll be forced to create as many accounts as necessary to save lives. A little awe would be appropriate right about now.

Posted (edited)

I think It's a twisted need to be noticed and respected through a similar mechanism to "theres no bad publicity" Pretty harmless in my opinion...Im more aftaid of the smart people who get crazy ideas.

Edited by koti
Posted

All that aside, his post was an excellent tribute to Robert L Foreward, writer of Dragon's Egg, one of my favorite sci-fi novels.

Posted

All that aside, his post was an excellent tribute to Robert L Foreward, writer of Dragon's Egg, one of my favorite sci-fi novels.

 

I was trying to remember which of his novels I've read, and this was it. The cheela on the neutron star, right? This story was great prep for understanding the dimensions in Flatland.

Posted

All that aside, his post was an excellent tribute to Robert L Foreward, writer of Dragon's Egg, one of my favorite sci-fi novels.

I wiki'd it. I think I want to read it.

Posted (edited)

[shameless plug] There's a thread about Dragon's Egg in the Book Talk subforum. [/shameless plug]

Edited by Daecon
Posted

I am really curious why some posters are so desperate that they will create multiple accounts to keep posting, even if only suspended for a few days.

 

Do they really think that their idea is so important, it must be heard?

Do they just think that rules don't apply to them?

I suspect that many times they simply don't realize this isn't some massive community with thousands of daily active members. Many likely think their sockpuppet will go unnoticed and simply get lost and go undetected in the noise.

 

Other times, it's just straight defiance. "Eff you, I won't do what you tell me! The "man" can't keep ME down! I've never been a rule follower!"...that sorta thing.

Posted

All that aside, his post was an excellent tribute to Robert L Foreward, writer of Dragon's Egg, one of my favorite sci-fi novels.

 

 

Did he write the whole book, or just the first bit?

Posted

I suspect that many times they simply don't realize this isn't some massive community with thousands of daily active members.

I wonder why it is that in a community with thousands of registered users only a handful are active. It might be a good idea for the mods to discuss this among themselves.

Posted (edited)

I wonder why it is that in a community with thousands of registered users only a handful are active. It might be a good idea for the mods to discuss this among themselves.

It has small active core user base with quite a lot of transient traffic. It's pretty steady from about 9am UK through to about 1am. Most registered users probably asked a question or two or had 'theory' to present and moved on.

Edited by StringJunky
Posted

I wonder why it is that in a community with thousands of registered users only a handful are active. It might be a good idea for the mods to discuss this among themselves.

 

I would guess that many, if not most of these accounts are people who register to ask a question and then disappear soon thereafter. In fact, that's exactly what I did but I came back for more questions and eventually decided to stay.

Posted

I wonder why it is that in a community with thousands of registered users only a handful are active. It might be a good idea for the mods to discuss this among themselves.

 

Are you suggesting it's our fault, or that we take on marketing responsibilities as well? Resources are slim. AFAIK we have minimal income from banner ads that pays upkeep only.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.