Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

 

That is cool. Is this the same phenomenon as the perihelion shift of Mercury, or something totally different?

 

 

I imagine largely the same, but the multi-body dynamics are probably a lot more complex in this case. (Plus there is always the hope that it might show some unexpected errors in GR...)

Posted

 

That is cool. Is this the same phenomenon as the perihelion shift of Mercury, or something totally different?

 

I think the major change in the orbit is basically what we would expect from a GR calc/model rather than a Newtonian.

 

 

 

 

I imagine largely the same, but the multi-body dynamics are probably a lot more complex in this case. (Plus there is always the hope that it might show some unexpected errors in GR...)

 

I know they run those calcs for binaries - I think you need to be able to work out the masses involved both via observation and by orbit (to compare gravitational mass and inertial). But then the fiendish ways experimentalist get around problems occuring light years away regularly baffles me

Posted

 

 

I imagine largely the same, but the multi-body dynamics are probably a lot more complex in this case. (Plus there is always the hope that it might show some unexpected errors in GR...)

By my calculations, S14, which should have the largest degree of precession due to GR, shifts by ~0.2 degrees per orbit. This works out to 1910 sec of arc per century, compared to Mercury's 43 sec of arc per century.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.