Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

It's not "defending science" when you claim to base your idea on current science but then extend it in ways that are utterly different to current science.

 

If, instead of feigning asking a question in the relativity section, you had started your thread in the speculations section, and if you had properly defended your claims, then your thread might well still be open.

 

 

 

(Did you ever have a thread in speculations that got closed? I didn't find any.)

Edited by pzkpfw
Posted

Well what can i say. Make speculation. Get post closed. Defend science get post closed. What a pointless forum .

 

 

How old are you? You sound like a five year old who has been told he can't have an ice cream.

 

Maybe you need to grow up, learn a little humility and understand that sometimes you can be wrong.

Posted

Well what can i say. Make speculation. Get post closed. Defend science get post closed. What a pointless forum .

 

 

Participation here is voluntary.

Posted

Well what can i say. Make speculation. Get post closed. Defend science get post closed. What a pointless forum .

 

Science has important, shared definitions for certain words that you can't tamper with without removing the meaningfulness they have. You can't redefine those words on a whim so they fit the ideas in your head. The shared definitions are important in removing the very subjectivity you're trying to force into your ideas by using non-standard definitions.

 

The fact that you don't understand this, coupled with your insistent assertions that you're "right" despite all the people showing where you aren't, led to at least three non-staff members reporting your latest post that ignores science (after many patient pages of your hand-waving).

 

I suggest you remove whatever blinders are making you think you know things you don't, and go back and read the thread (not just your posts, but the others as well), and realize you're guessing yet insisting you're right, and you aren't giving anyone any reasons to trust your word over mainstream science. Also, please keep in mind that we'd like to see you succeed here, but that will require following our rules and presenting a bit more rigor. Asking more questions and making fewer assertions would be an added bonus.

Posted

Well what can i say. Make speculation. Get post closed. Defend science get post closed. What a pointless forum .

I know, right?!?!

 

Given that you know you are right, I can see where you would be frustrated by all the physicists and other professionals erroneously pointing out mistakes in your posts. I mean, imagine the odds of you being unlucky enough to post on the one science forum where every scientist would be wrong about the exact same thing in the exact same way!!!

 

How can they not see that perhaps they should at least consider the possibility they may be wrong in the face of such strong opposition?

 

 

Posted

Well what can i say. Make speculation. Get post closed. Defend science get post closed. What a pointless forum .

If you don't like the forum then why are you still here?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.