Spooky Interaction?

[36grit]

"If you plot a fractal position for Z=Zsquare+C then you have automatically plotted it's entangled counterpart -Z=Zsquare+C."

 

Nothing spooky about it.

As long as you understand that; "one does not plot infinite particles in a three dimensional space, but rather you plot it's position on an infinitely repeating shape within realities natural fractal."

 

Mark Clayton Beal

[swansont]

!

Moderator Note

Why is this posted in philosophy?

[36grit]

I don't know, should we move it to speculations? trash? It was more philosophical when I first wrote it, but then I guess it became something else as I re-wrote it a few times. Sorry.

[Strange]

Mark Clayton Beal

 

 

Who?

 

Can you provide a source for these quotations?

[imatfaal]

!

Moderator Note

 

Moved to speculations

 

Please give some numerical and graphical examples of what you are claiming

 

[Mordred]

"If you plot a fractal position for Z=Zsquare+C then you have automatically plotted it's entangled counterpart -Z=Zsquare+C."

 

Nothing spooky about it.

As long as you understand that; "one does not plot infinite particles in a three dimensional space, but rather you plot it's position on an infinitely repeating shape within realities natural fractal."

 

Mark Clayton Beal

How does this formula even get applied when dealing with any type of particle?