Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

 

All the empirical evidence shows in the opposite direction: that consciousness is a function of the processes in the brain. Philosophy contradicting empirical evidence is very poor philosophy, and in fact worthless.

Not a big fan of his thread, it sounds like mumbo jumbo. In any case, emperical evidence indicates a small amount of telepathic conscious influence. The amount is very small, and not of the psychadelic mumbo jumbo proprieties implied in the OP.

Posted

Not a big fan of his thread, it sounds like mumbo jumbo. In any case, emperical evidence indicates a small amount of telepathic conscious influence. The amount is very small, and not of the psychadelic mumbo jumbo proprieties implied in the OP.

Can you provide a reference to this evidence (preferably from a peer reviewed publication).

Posted

I am also pretty sure that the Global Consciousness Project is yet to identify a real data point. Mother Theresa's funeral, 9/11 etc all provided blips - but with no good correlation and no differentiation between blips when nothing happened. All a load of crackpottery at present til they pony up some significant data

Posted

I am also pretty sure that the Global Consciousness Project is yet to identify a real data point. Mother Theresa's funeral, 9/11 etc all provided blips - but with no good correlation and no differentiation between blips when nothing happened. All a load of crackpottery at present til they pony up some significant data

 

 

It did look like an exercise in selection and confirmation biases, but I haven't looked at it in enough detail to draw any conclusions.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.