DQW Posted July 17, 2005 Posted July 17, 2005 M is the pole strength (proportional to the magnetic moment) - it is not the field at some distance from the magnet. Think of the electrostatic analogue, the force between two charges. [math]F = \frac {kQ_1Q_2}{r^2} [/math] [math]E_{Q_1}® = \frac {kQ_1}{r^2} [/math] [math]\implies F(on~Q_2) = Q_2 \cdot E_{Q_1}|_{r=r_{Q_2} [/math]
labview1958 Posted July 19, 2005 Posted July 19, 2005 I have done some calculations using the empirical result from the website. I generally got this type of equation: F = ax^2 + bx + c where F=Force between identical magnets & x=separation distance between identical magnets. It can be inferred that for small separation distances F=bx + c and large separation distances F=ax^2. Is this above reasoning logical. It is based on empirical evidence. Should it be F=ax^4 + bx^3 + cx^2 + dx + e ?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now