Manticore Posted May 5, 2017 Posted May 5, 2017 He's either trolling or the last few remaining brain cells have finally evaporated.
imatfaal Posted May 5, 2017 Posted May 5, 2017 ! Moderator Note   He's either trolling or the last few remaining brain cells have finally evaporated.  And whilst I agree with the sentiment - if we could also keep such comments to a minimum. The Moderators will try to keep discussions flowing and in line with the rules and spirit of the forum - but we are time limited - so we would ask members to report posts they feel are in breach of the rules rather than add fuel to the flames.  Thanks  Edit - And as always please do not respond to this moderation within the thread Â
Mordred Posted May 5, 2017 Posted May 5, 2017 I have asked you several times now for evidence, I fyou can not convince an average person like myself with easy explanation, then surely there is something amiss? You asked for proof like Everyone has access to a facility like CERN. We provided the research papers as we cannot hand you a Higgs Boson. Â Can you draw a picture of a photon? of course not. Why would you expect a picture of the Higgs? Â Would you even know how to seperate individual particles from a scattering diagram? Do you know how to calculate the mass of a particle and its spin from its trail left after a collision?
JohnLesser Posted May 5, 2017 Author Posted May 5, 2017 Do you understand the difference? I did provide the answer to what distinquishes a VP from a real particle. Â The Higgs boson is a real particle not virtual Ok, so if it is a real particle, you should have a picture of it? Â Define real? -1
DrP Posted May 5, 2017 Posted May 5, 2017 Real - it has been tested for and detected in actually real life experiments that were designed to look for it. Â How can you take a picture of it? You KNOW for sure that is impossible and you were told above it was impossible. Â Do you actually have any scientific background at all? Like - where did you do your degree and post grad work? 1
Mordred Posted May 5, 2017 Posted May 5, 2017 Ok, so if it is a real particle, you should have a picture of it? Â Define real? Good luck you define real.
JohnLesser Posted May 5, 2017 Author Posted May 5, 2017 (edited) ! Moderator Note  JohnLesser  If you continue to post trollish and irrationally anti-science rubbish we will lock this thread. if you do not understand something ask a question - but subsequently dismissing the answers given because you are ignorant of the fundamentals of empirical science (upon which all possible answers must be based) will not be tolerated.  Comments along the lines of show me a picture of a Higg's Boson seem to be deliberately provacative.  Edit - Do not respond to this moderation within the thread   I have asked for an easy explanation, they are not giving an easy explanation or providing any basic easy to understand evidence. How do you expect anyone to accept something to be true if the replies keep talking to people as if everyone is a qualified scientist?  To me a particle has physicality, things with physicality reflect light and can be seen no matter how small. So please define particle to me because obviously if they are not providing observation they do not mean a real particle, their definition is of something else.  P.s I am not trolling, they are failing to learn me correctly. They are not teachers although some members may be. Edited May 5, 2017 by JohnLesser -1
Mordred Posted May 5, 2017 Posted May 5, 2017 (edited) https://www.google.ca/search?client=ms-android-samsung&source=android-browser&ei=734MWfyjDI20jwOgk6OABg&q=Higgs+boson+imaged&oq=Higgs+boson+imaged&gs_l=mobile-gws-serp.3..0i13k1j0i22i30k1j0i13i5i30k1j0i8i13i30k1.96038.111951.0.113614.45.37.2.3.3.0.298.5764.1j30j4.35.0....0...1c.1j4.64.mobile-gws-serp..19.26.3695.3..0j35i39k1j0i7i30k1j0i67k1j0i22i10i30k1j0i131k1j33i160k1.dHhgtHHLioE#imgdii=g6DVqW6jOsIDaM:&imgrc=gs5hM1vXGQKgKM: Â There is your images find the right set of excitations that represent the Higgs in there. Â (requires tremendous computing time on highly advanced computers) Edited May 5, 2017 by Mordred 1
Strange Posted May 5, 2017 Posted May 5, 2017 Ok, so if it is a real particle, you should have a picture of it? Â Â Like we have photos of muons, neutrinos, quarks, gluons, W and Z bosons, photons, and electrons.
JohnLesser Posted May 5, 2017 Author Posted May 5, 2017 Good luck you define real. Physically observed.
hypervalent_iodine Posted May 5, 2017 Posted May 5, 2017 ! Moderator Note JohnLesser, this fingers in ears approach of yours really isn't going to work here. This thread has trailed a bit from the OP, and your obstinance tells me that you have no real interest in discussion. Thread closed.
Recommended Posts