Laughablestuff Posted May 9, 2017 Posted May 9, 2017 I want to start with Schrödinger personally. We have reason to believe that on the subatomic level, in the absence of a conscious observer, all possibilities occur with the actual one being what is aligned when the situation is observed. Quantum entanglement I think? But in metallurgy , there's info on subatomically removing the lattice bonds In Certain metals, to induce a liquid state at room temp. I can try to find it again if need, but with that idea, couldn't we knock around the "lattice bonds" of unobserved confined events?
Mordred Posted May 9, 2017 Posted May 9, 2017 (edited) An important distinction. Observed in QM means to interfere via measurement in essence. Take for example probing the postion of an particle. You essentially need to fire other electrons into a confined region and look at the interference patterns.. In essence the very act required to measure a particle causes interference. Edited May 9, 2017 by Mordred 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now