Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
I knew Psychiatrists were just guessing most of the time
The study doesn't indicate that they were inaccurate or guessing. They had higher success than random chance. The point of the study was that a computer could outperform highly experienced psychiatrists by analyzing a simple set of parameters.
Posted

Personally, I would stick with human intuition. Determining how somebody will act takes human mind, not computer processing. Sure, some cases could be easily determined by either one, but with a human mind behind it, a computer doesn't even compare. A human brain will forever outperform a computer, no matter what. We have the sense of free will, and a computer doesn't, which is why I wouldn't put things like that in the hand of a computer (which doesn't have hands).

Posted

Ah yes, but it does remind me of a funny story I heard a few years ago where some people entered a chimp into an stock performance contest.

 

I think the chimp finished in the top 5. Which was probably a tad embarressing for some of the gambl, err financial managers. :P

 

I think it was in one of those "What on earth!" boxes so I don't know how

factual it was, but it was still funny.

 

Cheers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.