admiral_ju00 Posted June 4, 2005 Posted June 4, 2005 This might displease some creationists. http://today.reuters.com/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=scienceNews&storyID=2005-06-02T180216Z_01_N62647062_RTRIDST_0_SCIENCE-DINOSAUR-DC.XML
Phi for All Posted June 8, 2005 Posted June 8, 2005 I'm sure the creationists are busy figuring a way around this as we speak.
Martin Posted June 8, 2005 Posted June 8, 2005 read this to my wife her questions: did a T.Rex hen cackle after she laid an egg.
ed84c Posted June 17, 2005 Posted June 17, 2005 im not sure creationists have any problems to the evolution of dianosaurs.
Mokele Posted June 17, 2005 Posted June 17, 2005 They have a problem with any sort of evolution of any organism. Some claim to accept "microevolution" without accepting "macroevolution" without realizing the distinction is artificial. Mokele
Etacude Posted June 23, 2005 Posted June 23, 2005 If I remember correctly, I once come across a documentary film or article about some scientists who do not believe in evolution theory. They are not (or perhaps all) religious individuals, but just dissaprove the logic of evolution from certain scientific perspective.
atinymonkey Posted June 23, 2005 Posted June 23, 2005 Egad! Burn down the schools! In reality, there is no one theory of evolution. Of the many that exist, some have been disproven. That's the beauty of the scientific community, it's open to change based on new information or informed debate. Unfortunately, creationists think that their version of informed debate (ill-informed ranting) is a route to undermining sound theory.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now