ecoli Posted June 7, 2005 Posted June 7, 2005 I have a question about photons. How can they have momentum but be massless. If they are massless, them they should have no momentum, and vice versa, right? p=mv. Or am I just applying classical mechanics laws to something I shouldn't?
5614 Posted June 7, 2005 Posted June 7, 2005 Because with photons we are not talking classical momentum, you can work out momentum using p = hf/c and I think there's another one, possible h/f or something, I can't remember off by heart.
ecoli Posted June 7, 2005 Author Posted June 7, 2005 How does a photon have momentum? just because it's traveling fast?
5614 Posted June 7, 2005 Posted June 7, 2005 Any moving object has a momentum, that's logic... however you are using a classical equation for a non-classical particle (a photon). We know that (for a photon): e^2 = (pc)^2 + (mc^2)^2 but for a photon we have no mass, this results in: e^2 = (pc)^2 or for easier viewing but losing technicality e=pc which is rearranged as p=e/c but now we must define e, so we use the equation e=hf so we get p=hf/c
5614 Posted June 7, 2005 Posted June 7, 2005 Oh yeah, I looked it up... about when I mentioned the other formula, it is [math]p = \frac{h}{\lambda}[/math]
Tom Mattson Posted June 7, 2005 Posted June 7, 2005 p=mv. Or am I just applying classical mechanics laws to something I shouldn't? Your reasoning does indeed go south for this reason. As we learn from quantum mechanics, [math]p= h / \lambda[/math], regardless of whether a particle has mass or not. It's funny you bring this up because just minutes ago I was reading over a beautiful presentation of just this very thing in a free e-book: http://www.geocities.com/zcphysicsms/chap3.htm
rajama Posted June 17, 2005 Posted June 17, 2005 It's funny you bring this up because just minutes ago I was reading over a beautiful presentation of just this very thing in a free e-book: http://www.geocities.com/zcphysicsms/chap3.htm Grandfather paradox - nice...
Hyd Posted June 23, 2005 Posted June 23, 2005 If you use higher dimensional theory, is light not consider a vibration in the 4th Spatial Dimension (aka The 5th Dimension)? If you consider higher dimensional theory, look up when the kaluza-klein theory (which had flaws of course, but lead to the string theory).
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now