Acme Posted July 9, 2017 Posted July 9, 2017 (edited) You guys spill out alot of contradictions. Some of you say it always works some of you say it never works, and then all sorts of bs in between. It never works for n>=3. Wiles "proof" is some big bs I assure you.Wile's proof agrees with you that there are no solutions to [math]x^n+y^n=z^n, n>=3[/math]. Edited July 9, 2017 by Acme
John Cuthber Posted July 9, 2017 Posted July 9, 2017 You guys spill out alot of contradictions. Some of you say it always works some of you say it never works, and then all sorts of bs in between. It never works for n>=3. Wiles "proof" is some big bs I assure you. You seem to think that saying "it never works for n is 3 or more" is somehow a contradiction of "it sometimes works for n =2". Try reading more carefully. Also, you keep saying "Wiles "proof" is some big bs I assure you." Can you explain his proof and what you think are the problems with it? Nobody is going to take you seriously unless you can show that you understand the subject, and so far you are a long way from doing that. 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now