Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Are these homework questions?  Are you a bot? Are you asking then answering questions from another site?  This sudden flurry of one line questions is a bit weird.

Posted

Nope!Apparently i have to seperate some questions from a previous post of mine(request from moderator).And nope this aren't homework questions. :)

Sorry for the misunderstanding!

Posted (edited)

I would suggest getting 3D application such as f.e. Blender. It's free. Then make box (it's be water, make diffuse color blue), and long thin cylinder (it's be straw, make diffuse color green). Place camera in such way to see them both. Enable real-time previewing. And start adjusting transparency, and then refractive index parameters, to see what they have effect.

Add to it procedural texture displacement of water object, to simulate waves, ripples on the surface of water.

Even in 3D application, simulating reality, it'll bend.

 

Edited by Sensei
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...
Posted

^Speed of light is constant. Only the "apparent" speed of light changes since the photons interact with more molecules in water than in air

Posted
3 minutes ago, iNow said:

^Speed of light is constant. Only the "apparent" speed of light changes since the photons interact with more molecules in water than in air

There's some semantics here, muddling the physics.

Speed of photons is constant. The speed of light in a medium varies with the index of refraction. There's nothing wrong with saying light propagation slows in a medium; it takes longer for light to exit a medium compared to the same distance in a vacuum. There's noting "apparent" about that. The classical explanation is that the wavelength changes owing to the different values of permeability and permittivity; their product gives 1/v^2

The constant value (more technically, the invariant value) is the speed of light in a vacuum, which is c. It's wrong to say c varies, but not wrong to say the speed of light varies. 

Posted
3 hours ago, iNow said:

Thanks for the clarification. I'll need to update my phrasing and thinking accordingly

Like I said, it's semantics. Whether you mean "speed of light propagation in a medium" or "speed of light in a vacuum" sometimes has to be discerned from context. It's the kind of sloppiness one gets with an attempt at brevity from using jargon. One physicist saying it to another is unlikely to cause a problem, but if you aren't as well-versed, it can cause conceptual issues. And in equations, it's easy figure it out. One is c/n, the other is c.

Luckily there are people here who can translate.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.