Nuclei of a atom

[ivylove]

How can a nuclear proton represented with an electromagnetic field that is expanding maintain a particle structure of a nuclei as time increases. Does the nuclear electromagnetic magically not expand as time increases? What may I ask what is happening here? Some smart girls needs to do some cleaning to this sloppiness that the boys have made.

Edited August 1, 2017 by ivylove

[mathematic]

Your assertions contradict reality.  How can you justify them?

[ivylove]

Does an EM field expand? Also, girl power.

Edited August 1, 2017 by ivylove

[studiot]

56 minutes ago, ivylove said:

How can a nuclear proton represented with an electromagnetic field that is expanding maintain a particle structure of a nuclei as time increases. Does the nuclear electromagnetic magically not expand as time increases? What may I ask what is happening here? Some smart girls needs to do some cleaning to this sloppiness that the boys have made.

Nonsense, it is the augean stables that need cleaning of trolls.

[ivylove]

Does an electromagnetic field based on Faraday's induction effect expand. Please, explain what you are assuming is "nonsense".  It is the electromagnetic theory of modern physics or something else?

[studiot]

6 minutes ago, ivylove said:

Does an electromagnetic field based on Faraday's induction effect expand. Please, explain what you are assuming is "nonsense".  It is the electromagnetic theory of modern physics or something else?

What do you call someone who cannot tell the difference between singular and plural ?

Edited August 1, 2017 by studiot

[ivylove]

Are you not avoiding the question that is being presented to you? I have clearly stated the question at hand and you seem to be reluctant in answering the said problem that I have exposed regarding physics and since this is a physics forum and not a English grammar forum I believe that typo errors are not a sufficient reason to avoid answering the question. Perhaps you should allow the numerous people with much more superior knowledge regarding physics have a chance to respond or may you could email a physics prof from MIT or Stanford, or Harvard to answer the problem.

[ivylove]

 

In Einstein's paper, "The Principle of Relativity and Its Consequences in Modern Physics" (1910), Einstein describes an electromagnetic ether.

"When it was realized that a profound analogy exists between the elastic vibrations of ponderable matter and the phenomena of interference and diffraction of light, it could not be doubted that light must be considered as a vibratory state of a special kind of matter. Since, moreover, light can propagate in places devoid of ponderable matter, one was forced to assume for the propagation of light a special kind of matter that is different from ponderable matter, and that was given the name "ether." (Einstein⁴, § 1).

"The introduction of the electromagnetic theory of light brought about a certain modification of the ether hypothesis. At first the physicists did not doubt that the electromagnetic phenomena must be reduced to the modes of motion of this medium. But as they gradually became convinced that none of the mechanical theories of ether provided a particularly impressive picture of electromagnetic phenomena, they got accustomed to considering the electric and magnetic fields as entities whose mechanical interpretation is superfluous. Thus, they have come to view theses fields in the vacuum as special states of the ether" (Einstein⁴, § 1).

 

Einstein describes an electromagnetic ether but Maxwell's electromagnetic field originates from Faraday's induction effect that is not luminous. Also, Maxwell's electromagnetic field that is propagating at the velocity of light conflicts with Fresnel's diffraction mechanism that is based on interfering light waves formed by the vibration of an ether that remains stationary after the light waves propagate through the ether

[studiot]

9 minutes ago, ivylove said:

Are you not avoiding the question that is being presented to you? I have clearly stated the question at hand and you seem to be reluctant in answering the said problem that I have exposed regarding physics and since this is a physics forum and not a English grammar forum I believe that typo errors are not a sufficient reason to avoid answering the question. Perhaps you should allow the numerous people with much more superior knowledge regarding physics have a chance to respond or may you could email a physics prof from MIT or Stanford, or Harvard to answer the problem.

You made no typo since you made the same error in the thread that was closed and twice in the opening post of this thread.

I did however overlook the grammatical error "a atom"

An atom has one nucleus.

Edited August 1, 2017 by studiot

[ivylove]

The question is "is an nuclear electromagnetic field expanding?"

[MigL]

No the EM field does not expand.

The field is 'there', and if enough energy is localized ( excitation of the field ) at a particular position, we have the real 'particle' of that field.
If that excitation is 'stabilized' by other particles/excitations of their particular fields, it can remain localized ( in a nucleus, say ).

There are no 'boys' here, like you might be used to dealing with.
Just men and women.

[ivylove]

Your time is up and I will answer this question tomorrow or when I get back.

Edited August 1, 2017 by ivylove

[imatfaal]

!

Moderator Note

Ivylove

Stop the infantile girl power / silly boys routine - it is embarrassing.    Start asking questions that interest you and not poached from random places on the internet - if you cannot debate and interact with the other posters without ripping stuff off from other people's work then this thread will be locked too. 

 

[ivylove]

If you do not unlock all the posts...................

[swansont]

2 minutes ago, ivylove said:

If you do not unlock all the posts...................

!

Moderator Note

Do you really think implying a threat is going to serve you well here?