Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I just watched "New Zealand Skeletons in the Cupboard" on youtube. It suggests that people arrived on New Zealand before the officially recognized date, and that scientists are ignoring evidence pursuant to the facts. I'm a dumb American who doesn't know anything about New Zealand. Should I ignore this video?

Posted

I haven't had time to watch the video, but I did do a quick Google search on it. I am from NZ myself and had never heard of what they mention. The only websites I could find information looked to be nonsense conspiracy sites though, so I'm not sure I am willing to believe anything they have to say without further research. 

Posted (edited)
6 hours ago, EdEarl said:

 I'm a dumb American who doesn't know anything about New Zealand. Should I ignore this video?

Ahh New Zealand, just across the ditch from Australia...pretty good Rugby players most of the time..reported to have more sheep then people...and often proposed as a state of Australia  :P:D [Apologies to my Kiwi friends on my poor humour. :) ]

 

All jokes aside, on the video, I will certainly watch in its entirety when I have time, but I really don't see to much logic in why scientists would want to or need to hide anything.....

 

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt5511224/

Storyline

60,000 skeletons ground up for fertilizer, giant skeletons removed from their resting places and destroyed, 2000 bound skeletons covered over by bulldozers and buried without respect under modern buildings - WHAT IS GOING ON IN NEW ZEALAND? '

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis


Edited by beecee
Posted (edited)

The idea of them hiding something does seem odd.

There is conversation about when people came to the new world, and some say there were people here before the Asian-North American land bridge. I think many scientists have accepted that people were here and killed off by something, then the new world was repopulated across the land bridge. Populating the world may have occurred earlier than first thought. Time will tell.

Edited by EdEarl
Posted
On 8/3/2017 at 10:30 AM, EdEarl said:

The idea of them hiding something does seem odd.

There is conversation about when people came to the new world, and some say there were people here before the Asian-North American land bridge. I think many scientists have accepted that people were here and killed off by something, then the new world was repopulated across the land bridge. Populating the world may have occurred earlier than first thought. Time will tell.

Time certainly will tell, one way or the other. As an example, new data puts the arrival of Australia's first settlers at around 50,000 years.

http://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2011/09/23/3323640.htm

  • 2 years later...
Posted (edited)

The New Zealand government made it illegal for any Maori to own any land in the 50s? (not sure on the dates)  since, they have been given hundreds of millions there is plenty of reason's to hide something there are over one hundred million reason's! 

Edited by Oldnzguy
Spelling

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.