An arxiv paper: A layman's explanation needed.

[beecee]

I came across this paper and would appreciate a basic rundown on essentially what it is suggesting or proposing. From my limited understanding, it seems to be illustrating how through various effects, cosmologists are able to deduce or eliminate alternative gravitational hypotheticals, and further enhance, [or otherwise]  GR.

Anyway, I would appreciate a professional outline........

 

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1111.5661.pdf

Stochastic backgrounds in alternative theories of gravity: overlap reduction functions for pulsar timing arrays: 

 

In the next decade gravitational waves might be detected using a pulsar timing array. In an effort to develop optimal detection strategies for stochastic backgrounds of gravitational waves in generic metric theories of gravity, we investigate the overlap reduction functions for these theories and discuss their features. We show that the sensitivity to non-transverse gravitational waves is greater than the sensitivity to transverse gravitational waves and discuss the physical origin of this effect. We calculate the overlap reduction functions for the current NANOGrav Pulsar Timing Array (PTA) and show that the sensitivity to the vector and scalar-longitudinal modes can increase dramatically for pulsar pairs with small angular separations. For example, the J1853+1303–J1857+0943 pulsar pair, with an angular separation of about 3 ◦ , is about 104 times more sensitive to the longitudinal component of the stochastic background, if it is present, than the transverse components.

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1111.5661.pdf

[Mordred]

will study this paper before I reply, but am reading them (the links above are identical).

Edit: This is going to take me a bit, gonna have to study it in more details on their new polarization treatments. Mathematically its well detailed but I need to work through them. I don't see anything unsound about what they are doing but still studying it.

In particular I am seriously questioning the modifications to the metric tensor. Regarding the time dependencies.

Edited August 11, 2017 by Mordred

[Mordred]

This paper is an F(R) gravity treatment,

https://arxiv.org/abs/1606.07000

that explains the concern I had with the [latex]g_{\mu\nu}[/latex] the first two pages of the above link explains the two treatments.

In a nutshell the first paragraph

"The questions about the concepts of dark matter and
dark energy motivated the development of new gravity
theories. Most of them are direct modifications of genneral relativity (GR), such as f(R) theories where, in conntrast to GR, the Einstein-Hilbert Lagrangian density is replaced by a nonlinear function f(R). The nonlinearities lead to different sets of field equations according to the different variational approaches for the action"

under F(R) the methodology looks correct. though I'm very rusty on F(R)

To understand the methodology a starting point is statistical calculus.

https://www.google.ca/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=http://www.columbia.edu/~mh2078/stochastic_calculus.pdf&ved=0ahUKEwi5l8Dzqs7VAhWN8oMKHceVCnUQFggiMAE&usg=AFQjCNEaY477wJHuzgVAfC6YtvhU8uH8sA

 

Last link will also help in all quantum topics...and engineering etc etc 

 

Edited August 11, 2017 by Mordred

[beecee]

18 hours ago, Mordred said:

This paper is an F(R) gravity treatment,

https://arxiv.org/abs/1606.07000

that explains the concern I had with the gμν the first two pages of the above link explains the two treatments.

In a nutshell the first paragraph

"The questions about the concepts of dark matter and
dark energy motivated the development of new gravity
theories. Most of them are direct modifications of genneral relativity (GR), such as f(R) theories where, in conntrast to GR, the Einstein-Hilbert Lagrangian density is replaced by a nonlinear function f(R). The nonlinearities lead to different sets of field equations according to the different variational approaches for the action"

under F(R) the methodology looks correct. though I'm very rusty on F(R)

To understand the methodology a starting point is statistical calculus.

https://www.google.ca/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=http://www.columbia.edu/~mh2078/stochastic_calculus.pdf&ved=0ahUKEwi5l8Dzqs7VAhWN8oMKHceVCnUQFggiMAE&usg=AFQjCNEaY477wJHuzgVAfC6YtvhU8uH8sA

 

Last link will also help in all quantum topics...and engineering etc etc 

 

Statistical calculus??? Thanks a lot!!

 

Edited August 11, 2017 by beecee

[Mordred]

lol ya don't need to understand it all, QM terminology arises from statistical calculus and so does much of its mathematical methodology.

For example sections on Stochastic probability, Gaussian, correlation function, locality, probabilities probability density function etc.

The rudiments of the math and arguments  is in the last link

Edited August 12, 2017 by Mordred