I have a theory about creating of Parallel Universes.

[Aqshin Xavier Alisoy]

So we know that obliques are bending the space-time. But I have got an idea that the obliques doesnt bending the space-time, they are pulling the space-time to theirselves. Or we can explain that space-time is like iron and obliques are magnet.

So if any obliques pulling fabric of space-time and cover theirselves with fabric of space-time, it will become parallel universe. 

 

I know this is madness but without any reasons I wanted to share this there. I dont have any scientific facts to prove it. Think it like a just an idea. 

 

I hope I can tell my idea with my not bad english. If I have any wrongs in grammar sorry.

[Endy0816]

Obliques? Did you mean black holes?

[Aqshin Xavier Alisoy]

yeah. 

[Silvestru]

By that "theory" these parallel universes would be very tiny. Not really Universes but more patches of different reality I guess.

*I say "tiny" compared to the actual Universe. 

Spoiler

 

[Aqshin Xavier Alisoy]

1 hour ago, Silvestru said:

By that "theory" these parallel universes would be very tiny. Not really Universes but more patches of different reality I guess.

*I say "tiny" compared to the actual Universe. 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

As you know universes are enlarging every moment. Why dont this ? 

1 hour ago, Silvestru said:

By that "theory" these parallel universes would be very tiny.

And I want to believe that you are not doing sarcasm by writing: By that 'theory'. 

[Endy0816]

Has been thought of before.

Main issues are the addition of new mass and the eventual loss of mass. Possible this wouldn't be seen as such in the sub-Universe though.

[Aqshin Xavier Alisoy]

If someone has any question ask please. I think that I can develop this theory with your questions.

[Country Boy]

  Will there be pink unicorns in these universes?

[Aqshin Xavier Alisoy]

28 minutes ago, HallsofIvy said:

  Will there be pink unicorns in these universes?

I dont know maybe

[Mordred]

Incorrect dynamics, charged fields has specific dynamics that are easily detectable.

The observations of our universe is homogeneous and isotropic which does not match the dynamics of a charged field.

Granted without any mathematics, I am only guessing at your descriptive.

[TheRadiochemist]

I had a similar theory to this which also explains the matter/antimatter asymmetry. I shared it on physics forums, but it got banned by admin because they didn't like theories. I'm not going to post it here, but I definitely think you are on to something, and perhaps we can work together to explain a possible split in the dimensions of our universe.  Also, although I am a chemistry know-it-all, I still have a large background knowledge in nuclear and particle physics, as well as a huge knowledge of fusion research and electroplasmaic engineering.

-RadioChemist

[TheRadiochemist]

18 hours ago, Silvestru said:

By that "theory" these parallel universes would be very tiny. Not really Universes but more patches of different reality I guess.

*I say "tiny" compared to the actual Universe. 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

By Universe, you obviously mean ours???

[Aqshin Xavier Alisoy]

On 9/15/2017 at 9:37 AM, TheRadiochemist said:

I had a similar theory to this which also explains the matter/antimatter asymmetry. I shared it on physics forums, but it got banned by admin because they didn't like theories. I'm not going to post it here, but I definitely think you are on to something, and perhaps we can work together to explain a possible split in the dimensions of our universe.  Also, although I am a chemistry know-it-all, I still have a large background knowledge in nuclear and particle physics, as well as a huge knowledge of fusion research and electroplasmaic engineering.

-RadioChemist

Sure we can work together. But my English is not too good. I mean we can have problems in our communication. Text me on there.

[Strange]

On 14/09/2017 at 1:58 PM, Endy0816 said:

Obliques? Did you mean black holes?

How the heck did you work that out!?

[Endy0816]

2 hours ago, Strange said:

How the heck did you work that out!?

Based off a connotation for the word oblique as something "not seen" and seeing roughly this same idea before in science fiction and popular science articles.

Stephen Hawking has something out now, but not original to him.

https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2016/04/18/black-holes-may-offer-way-out/ayFIhHEzAZyLjIZN7xWz4K/story.html

 

I'm guessing OP partly used an automatic translator. For whatever reason, they tend to go with connotations when they can't figure out a better match. Can sometimes figure out what was meant based off that.

Edited September 17, 2017 by Endy0816
clarity