Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

A rotovator/lunavator with a 200 km long tether rotating in space above the lunar surface drops momentarily to swap a large battery pack (mass of 250 kg) for a depleted one to be charged.  Is there a simple and effective mechanism that would do this? 

If the operation is too fast for a release then a catch, maybe two "bays" could be used.  Instead of exchanging position on the tether on route, the base (where the exchange takes place) could coordinate which side or position is open when the exchange happens so that the spent battery can be placed at the correct location.  Some king of catch and release mechanism - hook and eye?  Ideally, an object in flight could also be grabbed.

image.png.ed080f716d6a71ebd6a1833b33054f99.png

Here is a clever rotovator catch and release mechanism, it is at 3:00 into the video:

 

Longer description of the lunavator power here:

http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/110962-how-to-cheaply-and-efficiently-power-a-moon-base/

 

Posted

Even before the mechanism for release and catch, I want to see how the tether is built.

A description for a mechanical engineer, you know: what material, what shape, how much stress at 1680m/s tip speed and what mass.

I remind that tethers of carbon nanotubes are science-fiction, and their performance essentially unknown. The best existing material is graphite fibre.

Then, you might provide details about residual speed and height.

Posted
1 hour ago, Enthalpy said:

Even before the mechanism for release and catch, I want to see how the tether is built.

A description for a mechanical engineer, you know: what material, what shape, how much stress at 1680m/s tip speed and what mass.

I remind that tethers of carbon nanotubes are science-fiction, and their performance essentially unknown. The best existing material is graphite fibre.

Then, you might provide details about residual speed and height.

Spectra® 2000 Hoytether™

http://www.tethers.com/papers/CislunarAIAAPaper.pdf

Residual speed and height both need to be zero for the landing site ideally, but the paper states 0 m/s and 1 km height (top of a lunar mountain).

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.