No Dark Matter (split from Dark Matter ?)

[captcass]

There is no dark matter. One only has to apply General Relativity correctly to have the galactic orbital velocities we see.

Flattened spiral galaxies and spherical stellar systems have different shapes and different shaped time dilation gradients.

Within a stellar system, all events appear to accelerate increasingly as they approach the center of the dilation "pit", where the dilation gradient only equalizes in an infinitesimal point within the star. At his point, where ∆D = the difference in the rate of time between frames (designated proper and coordinate times) the math is determined by the following:

as ∆D→0,  ∆Y, ∆X and ∆Z→0

This impedance to the future evolution of events in all directions results in highly concentrated energy in the form of a star.

In flattened spiral galaxies, the dilation gradients from above and below the flat disk equalize within the disk and all events are evolved forward at the same rate of time, and, therefore, the same apparent velocity in space:

and, as ∆D→0,  ∆Y→0

and the curl of the orbit is the simple resultant of:

 ∆aX and ∆bZ

Because of the higher density of energy (mass) when a flattened galaxy is viewed from the side, giving it its "bar" shape, there is a deeper time dilation gradient when viewed from the side, so:

b is always > a

As events can no longer be evolved forward along the Y axis, and since the continuum MUST evolve forward, it appears to evolve forward (revolve) around the Z and X axes and we get circular motion.

The black hole at the center of a spiral galaxy is just a space where ∆D→1s/s

Edited October 29, 2017 by captcass

[beecee]

1 hour ago, captcass said:

There is no dark matter.

You seem rather sure of that...Perhaps you should submit a proper scientific paper for peer review, and let the world know how you have solved one of our greatest cosmological problems. You may even be in line for the next Physics Nobel.  

Quote

The black hole at the center of a spiral galaxy is just a space where ∆D→1s/s

No the SMBH at the center of our galaxy is just that...a SMBH that all galaxies seem to possess. To say there is nothing their is pretty silly.

[captcass]

Hi BeeCee.

Perhaps you should just review what I posted. I just edited it for submission to a pub, so I can't post that update here.

What I just posted, however, gets the gist.

You just have to get your head around the fact that you are not tying the quantum (spacetime) continuum and the apparent evolution of events of GR together. You still separate the two. To you, particles are moving "through" space. They are not, hence, IBEX found no "bow" shock. To combine the quantum field and the gravitational field together you have to view them as the effects of the same thing, i.e., time dilation.

GR describes the apparent relative evolution of events within the continuum relative to their relative rates of time as per Special Relativity, SR. This is not particles moving "through" space, which, as a physical person, a physicist, you want to see. It is what we see, after all. But what we see is relativistic and is dependent on ∆D, as per GR, even though we each experience the same invariable rate of time in our own worldline (proper rate of time).

I know this is counter-intuitive, but so is General Relativity.

Einstein believed we could just pass through a black hole without noticing anything different. Since he developed all this, I believe him, and I believe I am describing the same thing as he did because it is just as plain as day to me.

Hey, Mordred! Are you listening?

Look, Physics is all nice and physical. Quantum physics is not: it is all ephemeral.

The spacetime continuum evolves in the ephemeral, quantum physics way. There is no solid reality, with actual distances in space, only an evolving spacetime continuum with differences in the rate of time between and within events.

Edited October 29, 2017 by captcass

[beecee]

2 hours ago, captcass said:

Hi BeeCee.

Perhaps you should just review what I posted. I just edited it for submission to a pub, so I can't post that update here.

I read what you posted, and the general consensus of scientific evidence tells us that a form of matter exists that only interacts gravitationally and that has been labeled DM,

BHs are also supported by the bulk of scientific evidence, particularly with the discovery of GWs from four binary BH encounters.

Let me also add that based on empirical observational evidence, if BHs were to not exist, we would need something far more sinister and weird to explain those observations. Do you have any suggestions?  

[Strange]

5 hours ago, captcass said:

GR describes the apparent relative evolution of events within the continuum relative to their relative rates of time as per Special Relativity, SR.

You seem to think that GR and SR are separate things.

5 hours ago, captcass said:

Einstein believed we could just pass through a black hole without noticing anything different.

Citation needed.

5 hours ago, captcass said:

To you, particles are moving "through" space. They are not, hence, IBEX found no "bow" shock.

Most stars do have such a bow shock. (It just happens that ours is moving too slowly.) So this is not support for your idea. 

5 hours ago, captcass said:

I know this is counter-intuitive, but so is General Relativity

You are just making stuff up. It is not based on GR at all.