Space (s) -the third form of matter

[Dr. Charles Michael Turner]

    It’s a new theory which simplifies the understanding of general relativity.  The newest Theory of Everything by Dr. Charles Michael Turner. 

   The Expanding N.E.T. Wave theory states that not only did the Big Bang transition the finite singularity to create mass, energy and space, three forms of matter,  but each atom is still radiates more space. Space is defined as the gravitational field, continually radiating as a lowest energy field from all mass. It is important to note that low energy gravitational waves radiating from all mass simply follow Newton’s theee laws of motion, like mass.

s=ec^3 is the formula linking the standard model and general relativity. 

 

By overlaying the static field of general relativity with a continually radiating field and by understanding that Newton’s (Euler’s) laws of motion apply, the entire universe’s mysterious actions are easy to understand. 

Dark energy is Newton’s second law applied to three dimensions which also explains inflation properly. 

Dark matter and gravity are Newton’s third law which makes the Huygens principle the Huygens law or Newton’s(Euler’s) third law applied to waves. 

 

Time and space and gravitational mass (weight) are measurements of this process which creates a force of expansion and as each galaxy is losing mass with a constant force then each galaxy being its own Spacetime generator can travel up to the speed of light relative to other galaxies and no laws are broken. 

General relativity and Maxwell’s equations create perpetual motions machines which violate the basic laws of physics. This corrects the flaws in general relativity. 

   A dark matter halo is the constructive wave interference patterns of all mass radiating gravitational fields in the galaxy and forming a standing wavefront outside the galaxy and the inverse square law needs to be added from that perspective losing force back to the center of the galaxy. 

Its the copyrighted paper from Dr. Charles Michael Turner 

[studiot]

What sort of doctor did you say you were?

Are you pulling my leg or pulling my teeth?

[koti]

I'm pulling my hair.

 

[Dr. Charles Michael Turner]

By overlaying the Expanding N.E.T. Wave theory of the radiating gravitational field from all mass over a static field concentrated around all mass with infinite range as in general relativity and by knowing that radiating low energy fields in a medium collide and form larger combined radiating  fields the resulting reactions of field tension simply follow the physics laws just like radar 1/C^4 when the range is infinite vs 1/r^4 when the radar range is known. 

This is basically Newton’s third law or Euler’s law of motion. Coincidentally, this is the undiscovered back action of wavefront formation of the Huygens principle which is by definition, now the Huygens law. 

So low energy gravitational wave emissions from each mass collide forming wavefronts with back actions of gravitation which include gravity and dark matter (no particles) is a reaction function of Spacetime radiating from all mass. 

Mass energy (particle)

Photon energy (particle/ wave duality

Space energy = all wave. 

M + E+ S= total energy 

e=mc^2

s=ec^3

m=s/c^5

The universe is radiating/ expanding from mass to space via photon decay with in the  magnetic dipoles holding the atom together. 

An orbit, a dark matter halo and an event Horizion are continually radiating standing waves of the  the gravitational field of Spacetime. 

    Particles and lowest energy waves simply follow Newton’s (Euler’s) three laws of motion. Time and space and gravitational mass are relative because they are aspects of mass radiating it’s field into a larger combined radiating  field. Depending upon your speed relative to the surrounding changed the density relationship which is the basis of relativity. Radiating waves into a field and by increased speed desynchronizes the field by increases density of the field thereby slowing the  ability to radiated into a more dense medium slowing time and increasing relative mass and constricting relative length.  

 

So with this understanding, 

space does not violate any laws and has to obey the speed of the gravitational field (wave). 

This is becaue in this theory, a gravitational wave is a ripple of Spacetime, not a ripple in Spacetime. 

   Therefore, by overlaying General relativity with a radiating field from all mass in static equalibrium and these fields following Newton’s three  laws of motion then the universe’s actions can be understood completely. 

So with my theory you understand 100% of the universe, with the current way only 5% of the universe is understood. 

Expanding N.E.T. Wave theory 

all forces use energy and space follows the laws. 

 

With current thinking:

energy spontaneous appears in vacuum energy, orbits are perpetual motion machines, atoms are perpetual motion machines and magnetic fields are perpetual motion machines. Space is outside the laws. 

 

Yes it is embarrassing that I a dentist has to step in and straighten out the universe of theoretical physics. Even solve the formula that Einstein said he was not smart enough to figure out and spent 30 years trying and died not knowing. Answer me this. What the hell have you been doing as your second job? I have been solving the universe. 

In increase in Spacetime, the fabric of space radiating from all mass = A decrease in the energy within the magnetic dipoles within mass x c^3. 

S=ec^3=mc^5. 

Dark energy= Newton’s second law

Dark matter and gravity =  Newton’s second law because Newton’s three laws of motion apply to the waves of Spacetime, not just particles. 

 

 

 

 

1 hour ago, studiot said:

What sort of doctor did you say you were?

Are you pulling my leg or pulling my teeth?

And how does that have anything to do wirh anything? 

Read a little Richard Hamming 

57 minutes ago, koti said:

I'm pulling my hair.

 

Not relevant 

[swansont]

4 minutes ago, Dr. Charles Michael Turner said:

 Mass energy (particle)

Photon energy (particle/ wave duality

Space energy = all wave. 

M + E+ S= total energy 

e=mc^2

s=ec^3

m=s/c^5

What are all of these variables?

[Dr. Charles Michael Turner]

The energy of a photon within a magnetic dipole within the atoms decreases, (10^-54 kg ?) is e, c is the speed of light and ^ is to the power of , squared, cubed, etc. 

an increase in the gravitational field energy = a decrease in the energy within the magnetic dipoles of all mass  multiplied by the speed of light cubed. The other is just conversion to mass equilivant using the energy to mass formula. It should be clear now hopefully. 

Again, mass is in static equalibrium as the energy from the background and star generated amounts to a bath of energy while radiating gravitational energy as the energy used being radiated from all mass. The fabric of space is generated locally, that is why the laws of physics are local and non local, they start out being generated. Locally. 

It is quite simply actually, and explains mechanically and logically how the universe works. 

Unknowin phenomenon which are explained - dark matter, dark energy, inflation. Quantum entanglement.. and also follows Newton and Einstein under local reference frames. 

Three phases of matter, mass, energy and space, the universe is a forward/ Expanding  Spacetime universe because it is an inheritent quality of particle to wave, potential to kinetic energy process which drives the life of the universe. 

[beecee]

3 hours ago, Dr. Charles Michael Turner said:

So with this understanding, 

space does not violate any laws and has to obey the speed of the gravitational field (wave). 

This is becaue in this theory, a gravitational wave is a ripple of Spacetime, not a ripple in Spacetime. 

Spacetime (not space) is the gravitational field in GR.

A gravitational wave is a ripple of spacetime in GR

Quote

So with my theory you understand 100% of the universe, with the current way only 5% of the universe is understood. 

Quote

Yes it is embarrassing that I a dentist has to step in and straighten out the universe of theoretical physics. Even solve the formula that Einstein said he was not smart enough to figure out and spent 30 years trying and died not knowing. Answer me this. What the hell have you been doing as your second job? I have been solving the universe. 

So we'll see you in Stockholm Sweden next year?

The only embarrassment I see is an gross excess of arrogance in your statement.

 

Quote

space does not violate any laws and has to obey the speed of the gravitational field (wave). 

Common knowledge that spacetime is not curtailed by the universal speed limit. That only applies to massive objects.

 

Edited November 11, 2017 by beecee

[studiot]

Three posts and lots of wild claims, but not one word of evidence or support. (You did read the rules of the speculation forum?)

I also asked a valid question since you use the title Dr.

I will repeat it for your convenience

14 hours ago, studiot said:

What sort of doctor did you say you were?

 

Yes your Facebook says you are a dentist. In UK law that alone does not entitle you to use the title Dr.

 

[koti]

13 hours ago, Dr. Charles Michael Turner said:

Yes it is embarrassing that I a dentist has to step in and straighten out the universe of theoretical physics. Even solve the formula that Einstein said he was not smart enough to figure out and spent 30 years trying and died not knowing. Answer me this. What the hell have you been doing as your second job? I have been solving the universe. 

What is embarrassing is that everyone besides you is embarrassed by your crackpot posts. I tried to find an anchor point in your posts from which a process of your physics rehabilitation could start but I failed as theres borderline mental crap in virtually every sentence you wrote so far.

[Eise]

15 hours ago, Dr. Charles Michael Turner said:

Yes it is embarrassing that I a dentist has to step in and straighten out the universe of theoretical physics. Even solve the formula that Einstein said he was not smart enough to figure out and spent 30 years trying and died not knowing. Answer me this. What the hell have you been doing as your second job? I have been solving the universe. 

[Dr. Charles Michael Turner]

On 11/10/2017 at 9:13 PM, beecee said:

Spacetime (not space) is the gravitational field in GR.

A gravitational wave is a ripple of spacetime in GR

So we'll see you in Stockholm Sweden next year?

The only embarrassment I see is an gross excess of arrogance in your statement.

 

Common knowledge that spacetime is not curtailed by the universal speed limit. That only applies to massive objects.

 

In GR, a gravitational wave is a “ripple of Spacetime” in my theory a gravitational wave is a ripple of Spacetime. You don’t seem to understand the different thus you are wrong. 

A ripple in Spacetime is like smacking water in your bathtub and watching the wave move through the fabric. In other words, in GR the gravitational field is static, concentrated around mass yet has infinite range. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_wave for example 

My expanding N.E.T. Wave theory says that gravitational waves are ripples “of” Spacetime, like dumping water into your bathtub creating more water as the ripples are generated. In my theory, energy is converted from the dipoles with the energy loss is transferred to creating the third  phase of matter, the gravitational field of Spacetime, space itself. 

 

In the United States, a dental degree takes 8 years, four undergrad and four in dental school, our standards are hi, we are trained to write prescriptions and treat the patient like a physician, dental school is much harder than medical school during the first two years but then levels out. It’s actually insane that dental school packs 12-13 finals in four days with 36 credit hours per quarter. Since we are trained to diagnosis systemic disease and the impact orally, yes, we are Doctors, that is the degree, Doctor of dental surgery. We write the prescriptions just like a physician and the degree is a Doctor of dental surgery. So we in the United States are trained to be and we are bestowed the degree of Doctor of dental surgery. Your argument is with the system, not me, I did not choose the title, it is my degree.  I also have studied theoretical physics for thirty years and have know the working of the universe for 15 of those years. I am not just having so fun while I patent a few new technologies. There is a difference between ignorant and stupid. What many people forget is that a mathematical construct is made to describe a physical reality.  I understand the physical reality and have corrected the mathematical construct to fit reality. 

Example: the vacuum of Space

Edward Morley and Albert Michelson  bait and switched everyone. They determined, falsely, that the speed of light in a vacuum is the same all the time so therefore there is no medium of Space. They completely forgot and you did too, that an orbit, any orbit requires something, rather than nothing to keep it in orbit. 

 

By definition, nothing does not exist. Only something exists, so both I can’t hold an orbit. 

With general relativity, the gravitation field is static, no force is applied, instead it’s s warpage and that violates the understanding of a force because he creates a perpetual motion machine. 

By understand that all mass radiates space and space is the radiating gravitational field and it simply follows Newton’s three laws of motion then the evidence is the explaination, forward time, radiating space, relatively, dark energy, dark matter, inflation are all taken into account and make sense. 

And instantaneous communication is provable and that is my experiment which Won’t shut the ignorant up but you will have no explanation. Becaue I seem to have made the breakthrough and you haven’t, it becomes about personal attacks. It’s not my loss, it’s your loss. Funny, it would be like arguing A wall until you make the break through in your mind for both of us.

20 hours ago, studiot said:

Three posts and lots of wild claims, but not one word of evidence or support. (You did read the rules of the speculation forum?)

I also asked a valid question since you use the title Dr.

I will repeat it for your convenience

 

Yes your Facebook says you are a dentist. In UK law that alone does not entitle you to use the title Dr.

 

If you already know then you are bullying and harassing me

The current problems in physics that the Expanding N.E.T. Wave solves. 

Inflation, dark matter, dark energy, forward time, expanding space, relativity, the twin paradox. 

The twin paradox- it is 100% admitted by today’s theoretical physicists that they have no explanation for time dilation. 

How does the twins time slow in Einstein’s twin paradox? 

What is the mechanism? What is the process running the twin’s forward  time that by going fast, slows it?  Can you tell me, outside of my theory that the medium is increassing per until time thereby slowing the twins ability to radiate his own continuous field into a field ? 

Explain and stop the stupid bullying! Facts not name calling please 

 

Edited November 12, 2017 by Dr. Charles Michael Turner
Bullying response

[studiot]

Bullying?

All I have asked you to do is follow the rules of this forum and answer a politely put question.

 

[koti]

Okay Dr. Charles Michael Turner, there is some room for correction now. Although being incredibly arrogant and incredibly dull in the field of physics (borderline crackpot) you seem to imply in this last post that you are willing to learn - at least I hope so.


 

Quote

They completely forgot and you did too, that an orbit, any orbit requires something, rather than nothing to keep it in orbit. 

An orbit is a combination of forward motion of a body in space and a pull of gravity on it of another, more massive body in space. So that "something" which keeps a body in orbit - Earth for example is a gravity well created by a more massive body - Sun for example.

 

Quote

By understand that all mass radiates space and space is the radiating gravitational field and it simply follows Newton’s three laws of motion then the evidence is the explaination, forward time, radiating space, relatively, dark energy, dark matter, inflation are all taken into account and make sense. 

No. Mass does not radiate space. Mass curves space-time and we perceive it as gravity as well explained by GR. 

 

Quote

And instantaneous communication is provable and that is my experiment which Won’t shut the ignorant up but you will have no explanation. Becaue I seem to have made the breakthrough and you haven’t, it becomes about personal attacks. It’s not my loss, it’s your loss. Funny, it would be like arguing A wall until you make the break through in your mind for both of us.

No. Instantaneous communication is not possible in the context of particle superposition in quantum mechanics. 

 

Quote

 

How does the twins time slow in Einstein’s twin paradox? 

What is the mechanism? What is the process running the twin’s forward  time that by going fast, slows it?  Can you tell me, outside of my theory that the medium is increassing per until time thereby slowing the twins ability to radiate his own continuous field into a field ? 

 

The mechanism for time flowing at different rates for twins moving at different velocities is well explained by GR and is being put to use in everyday life. Satelite GPS's have to account for time dilation between clocks so you get an accurate reading in google maps in your phone for example. I would urge you to fill in the gaps in your basic physics knowledge first before you attempt to understand GR - otherwise you will fail at understanding any of it.

 

Quote

In the United States, a dental degree takes 8 years, four undergrad and four in dental school, our standards are hi, we are trained to write prescriptions and treat the patient like a physician, dental school is much harder than medical school during the first two years but then levels out. It’s actually insane that dental school packs 12-13 finals in four days with 36 credit hours per quarter. Since we are trained to diagnosis systemic disease and the impact orally, yes, we are Doctors, that is the degree, Doctor of dental surgery. We write the prescriptions just like a physician and the degree is a Doctor of dental surgery. So we in the United States are trained to be and we are bestowed the degree of Doctor of dental surgery. Your argument is with the system, not me, I did not choose the title, it is my degree.  I also have studied theoretical physics for thirty years and have know the working of the universe for 15 of those years. I am not just having so fun while I patent a few new technologies. There is a difference between ignorant and stupid. What many people forget is that a mathematical construct is made to describe a physical reality.  I understand the physical reality and have corrected the mathematical construct to fit reality. 

For this, I humbly suggest you see a shrink as you seem to be filled with insecurities. 

Edited November 12, 2017 by koti

[Capiert]

1 hour ago, koti said:

No. Mass does not radiate space. Mass curves space-time and we perceive it as gravity as well explained by GR. 

If I interpret what Dr. Turner('s math model) is implying,

 he's saying (in a different perspective)

 that if mass radiates space,

 then that additional space will be added

 (whether negative space might also be possible?, is not stated, because only addition is mentioned)

 to the existing space

 thus warping it (=the previous (space))

 to a new total

 i.e. (thus) affecting the (total amount of)

 spacetime

 around the mass.

Gravity is vertical,

 (not tangential (around like an orbit, "curve")).

So I can't support Koti's arguement on that point.

 

I'm surprised Studiot hit the nail on the head with tooth pulling,

 & he (Dr Turner) did admit being a dentist shortly after,

 so repeating the question (which Dr)

 seems inappropriate.

 

Can we cool down a bit & try to understand him.

He does seem to know a bit,

 just fill in the holes.

(Einstein wrote Relativity, for the common man with a high school education,

 with the intent to entertain us with some joyful times, in the intro.)

I mean, wouldn't it be helpful to (try to) be friendly.

Everybody that lands here goes into high gear (spontaineously, informal)

 but nobody knows so much about physics as you all.

All you have to do is ask the details

 & they might notice the pitfalls.

 

Appologies in advance.

 

 

 

Edited November 12, 2017 by Capiert

[Strange]

1 hour ago, koti said:

No. Mass does not radiate space. Mass curves space-time and we perceive it as gravity as well explained by GR. 

If anything, it is the other way round. In some coordinate systems (eg Gullstrand–Painlevé coordinates) can be interpreted as space falling towards mass. I am not aware of any solution to the EFE which correspond to space being “radiated”. But that’s what happens when people make up fairytales...

[koti]

Just now, Strange said:

If anything, it is the other way round. In some coordinate systems (eg Gullstrand–Painlevé coordinates) can be interpreted as space falling towards mass. I am not aware of any solution to the EFE which correspond to space being “radiated”. But that’s what happens when people make up fairytales...

Sure, but the "falling" of space towards mass is just an implication of GR being interpreted by that specific coordinate system. This is just as far from Dr Dentist's premise as the nearest neutron star.

[studiot]

39 minutes ago, Capiert said:

I'm surprised Studiot hit the nail on the head with tooth pulling,

 & he (Dr Turner) did admit being a dentist shortly after,

 so repeating the question (which Dr)

 seems inappropriate.

Though meant as a jocular pun that at least one other understood, wasn't a fortuitous accident, but +1 for the peacemaker post.

I don't see how asking for the credentials of someone makeing such sweeping claims is unreasonable.

 

[swansont]

On 11/10/2017 at 7:17 PM, Dr. Charles Michael Turner said:

The energy of a photon within a magnetic dipole within the atoms decreases, (10^-54 kg ?) is e, c is the speed of light and ^ is to the power of , squared, cubed, etc. 

an increase in the gravitational field energy = a decrease in the energy within the magnetic dipoles of all mass  multiplied by the speed of light cubed. The other is just conversion to mass equilivant using the energy to mass formula. It should be clear now hopefully. 

Hope springs eternal

Your explanation for e is nonsensical

You appear to have have six variables. M, E, S, m, e and s. Typically in physics, as with passwords, these are case sensitive, but apparently not here. That kind of inconsistency will only confuse things further.

Quote

 

M + E+ S= total energy 

e=mc^2

s=ec^3

m=s/c^5

 

E is already used for energy, in E=mc^2, but it's something else, too?

I don't see any consistency in your units.  If E has units of energy, S will not. M has units of mass. They cannot sum to give total energy.

 

[Capiert]

48 minutes ago, studiot said:

Though meant as a jocular pun that at least one other understood, wasn't a fortuitous accident, but +1 for the peacemaker post.

Yes well done.

Quote

I don't see how asking for the credentials of someone makeing such sweeping claims is unreasonable.

 

Yes, sorry, you are diplomatic enough

the website formally is still awkward for me.

Confirmation of him being a dentist came late(r).

I.e. His answer (12:10 "Yes it is embarrassing that I a dentist ..")

 was not ignored.

 

5 hours ago, Dr. Charles Michael Turner said:

On 11 November 2017 at 1:29 PM, studiot said:

Three posts and lots of wild claims, but not one word of evidence or support. (You did read the rules of the speculation forum?)

I also asked a valid question since you use the title Dr.

I will repeat it for your convenience

 

Yes your Facebook says you are a dentist. In UK law that alone does not entitle you to use the title Dr.

 

If you already know then you are bullying and harassing me.

I misinterpretted, (the same) as he did.

 

Edited November 12, 2017 by Capiert

[studiot]

Thanks for the reply, Capiert.

 

For all I knew Dr Turner might have been a doctor of divinity, which title is still due respect.

For instance Professor Michael Heller is one such and has written some useful stuff about differential manifolds that I am drawing on in another thread.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michał_Heller

 

Edited November 12, 2017 by studiot

[Dubbelosix]

On 11/11/2017 at 0:29 PM, studiot said:

Three posts and lots of wild claims, but not one word of evidence or support. (You did read the rules of the speculation forum?)

I also asked a valid question since you use the title Dr.

I will repeat it for your convenience

 

Yes your Facebook says you are a dentist. In UK law that alone does not entitle you to use the title Dr.

 

I agree, the question of what kind of doctor you are, is very relevant for instance, you sticking ''dr'' in front of your name when you are not a doctor of physics, could be easily deemed, disingenuous. 

Anyway, I can find you on the net. You say you have a degree in biology?

 

That is good - but here, it will be of little good. 

[Mordred]

Well I for one cannot find any consistency in the math posted. The formulas provided are literally useless.

 The explanations and replies by the OP clearly shows that the OP doesn't even understand the basic definitions of the terms he is using.

However On that I am not surprised, its very common to see posters believe they can rewrite physics without even having a basic understanding of physics with no rigor to applying even high school definitions taught in high school physics. 

lets start with provide a mathematical definition for each term Swansont has mentioned as the OP is not using them in any recognizable standard 

(not that a pile of zeroth order formulas could ever have any hope of rewriting physics) there isn't a single vector in the above, all values above are apparently scalars.) I wouldn't even call them first order approximations until I see more rigor.

Edited November 12, 2017 by Mordred

[koti]

I don’t know Mordred, are you sure you’re up for the challenge? Dr. Charles Michael Turner did mention that his grasp of math and physics surpases that of Einstein.

Edited November 12, 2017 by koti

[beecee]

13 hours ago, Dr. Charles Michael Turner said:

In GR, a gravitational wave is a “ripple of Spacetime” in my theory a gravitational wave is a ripple of Spacetime. You don’t seem to understand the different thus you are wrong. 

Sure I understand it, because simply, that's exactly what I said...a gravitational wave is a ripple OF spacetime in GR, and GR is at this time the overwhelmingly accepted and successful model of gravity which we have.

 

Quote

My expanding N.E.T. Wave theory says that gravitational waves are ripples “of” Spacetime, like dumping water into your bathtub creating more water as the ripples are generated. In my theory, energy is converted from the dipoles with the energy loss is transferred to creating the third  phase of matter, the gravitational field of Spacetime, space itself. 

Yes, and that's simply wrong, but easily and falsely claimed as correct on a public forum open to all and sundry.

Quote

 I also have studied theoretical physics for thirty years and have know the working of the universe for 15 of those years. I am not just having so fun while I patent a few new technologies. There is a difference between ignorant and stupid. What many people forget is that a mathematical construct is made to describe a physical reality.  I understand the physical reality and have corrected the mathematical construct to fit reality.

What so many people really forget, and what is plainly stupid, is what I told you re public forums and irrational claims in the previous reply. In other words your claims, no matter how arrogantly supported with rhetoric, mean absolutely nothing in the scientific world and in the greater scheme of things.

Quote

Edward Morley and Albert Michelson  bait and switched everyone. They determined, falsely, that the speed of light in a vacuum is the same all the time so therefore there is no medium of Space. They completely forgot and you did too, that an orbit, any orbit requires something, rather than nothing to keep it in orbit. 

No M and M were correct that the speed of light is a constant and that still holds today.         Spacetime on the other hand is simply the unified multi-dimensional framework within which it is possible to locate events and describe the relationships between them in terms of spatial coordinates and time. The concept of spacetime follows from the observation that the speed of light is constant and it does not vary with the motion of the emitter or the observer. Spacetime allows a description of reality that is common for all observers  regardless of their relative motion.

Space of course is simply the region between planets, stars, galaxies etc...if there was no space, everything would be together: if there was no time, everything would happen together.

 

Quote

By definition, nothing does not exist. Only something exists, so both I can’t hold an orbit. 

By definition an orbit is simply  an elliptical path around a body: 

 

Quote

By understand that all mass radiates space and space is the radiating gravitational field and it simply follows Newton’s three laws of motion then the evidence is the explaination, forward time, radiating space, relatively, dark energy, dark matter, inflation are all taken into account and make sense. 

Pseudoscientific rubbish.

Quote

 

And instantaneous communication is provable and that is my experiment which Won’t shut the ignorant up but you will have no explanation. Becaue I seem to have made the breakthrough and you haven’t, it becomes about personal attacks. It’s not my loss, it’s your loss. Funny, it would be like arguing A wall until you make the break through in your mind for both of us.

If you already know then you are bullying and harassing me

 

I'm neither bullying nor harassing you: I'm simply telling you, you are wrong, and no amount of false bravado, aggressive arrogance, and self gratutitous rhetoric  in your posts, will ever change that.

Quote

 

The current problems in physics that the Expanding N.E.T. Wave solves. 

Inflation, dark matter, dark energy, forward time, expanding space, relativity, the twin paradox. 

The twin paradox- it is 100% admitted by today’s theoretical physicists that they have no explanation for time dilation. 

How does the twins time slow in Einstein’s twin paradox? 

What is the mechanism? What is the process running the twin’s forward  time that by going fast, slows it?  Can you tell me, outside of my theory that the medium is increassing per until time thereby slowing the twins ability to radiate his own continuous field into a field ? 

Explain and stop the stupid bullying! Facts not name calling please 

 

Again, you are not being bullying and/or harassed. You are being informed that you are wrong in ignoring already validated evidence pointing to time dilation and length contraction. And obviously the reason why you are in the speculative section: Next stop down trash!

Edited November 12, 2017 by beecee

[Capiert]

Dear Dr Turner (Charles or Michael if I may?).

I've tried to interpret your 1st & 2nd posts, but I'm still (quite) a bit shakey (trying to make things fit) so please feel free to correct it.

If I understand correctly, you are trying to say the following.

 

Space s is the 3rd form of matter,

 which is a completely new idea

 that (nobody has thought of before, &)

 helps me

 to simplify my own understanding of general relativity.

 

I call it, (NToE), The newest Theory of Everything by Dr. Charles Michael Turner.

 

The Expanding N.E.T. (=New Everything Theory?)

 Wave theory states

 that not only did the Big Bang change (=transition)

 the finite singularity

 to create mass m, energy E and space s,

 (the) three forms of matter,

 but each atom [is] still,

 (&) radiates more space.

 

Space is defined as the gravitational field,

 continually radiating

 as a lowest energy field

 from all mass.

 

It is important to not(ic)e

 that low energy gravitational waves

 radiating from all mass

 simply follow Newton’s 3 motion laws,

 like mass (does).

 

The standard model can be linked to general relativity, using space

 s=E*(c^3)

 is energy E (=e)

 multiplied by

 light_speed c

 to the 3^rd (exponential) power,

 i.e. (c^3).

 

I (can (more) easily) understand (& comprehend)

 the entire universe’s mysterious actions,

 simply by (also) overlaying GR’s static field

 with a continually radiating field

 & knowing that Newton’s (& Euler’s) motion_laws apply.

 

Dark_energy

 is then Newton’s 2nd law (F=m*a) applied to 3 dimensions

 & that (also) explains inflation properly.

 

Dark_matter & gravity are Newton’s 3rd law ((opposite & equal “reaction” 0=F1-F2)

 which makes the Huygens principle

 the Huygens law or Newton’s (Euler’s) 3rd law applied to waves.

 

Time and space and gravitational_mass (weight Wt=m*g)

 are measurements

 of this process

 which creates an expansion force (F=m*a)

 and as each galaxy is loosing mass (m=F/a)

 with a constant force (F=m*a)

 then each galaxy being its own Spacetime generator

 can travel up (=be accelerated “a”) to light’s_speed c

 relative to the other galaxies

 & no laws are broken.

 

..because..

 

General relativity & Maxwell’s equations

 create perpetual motions machines

 which violate the basic laws of physics;

 & my concept corrects those (GR) flaws.

 

A dark matter halo

 is the constructive wave interference patterns

 of all mass radiating gravitational fields

 in the galaxy

 and forming a standing wavefront outside the galaxy

 and (so) the inverse square law needs to be added

 from that perspective loosing force

 back to the center of the galaxy.

 

That is (ruffly) the copyrighted paper from Dr. Charles Michael Turner.

 

Michael Turner

Posted yesterday at 12:10 AM

 

By overlaying the Expanding N.E.T. Wave theory

 of the radiating gravitational field

 from all mass

 over a static field

 concentrated around all mass

 with infinite range

 as in general relativity

 and by knowing that radiating low energy fields

 in a medium

 collide and form larger combined radiating fields, (then)

 the resulting reactions

 of field tension

 simply follow the physics laws

 just like radar 1/(c^4) when the range is infinite

 vs 1/(r^4) when the radar range is known.

 

That is basically Newton’s 3rd law or Euler’s law of motion.

 

Coincidentally, that is the undiscovered back action

 of wavefront formation

 of the Huygens principle

 which is by definition,

 now the Huygens law.

 

So low energy gravitational wave emissions

 from each mass

 collide forming wavefronts

 with back actions

 of gravitation

 which include gravity

 and dark matter (no particles) is a “reaction” function of Spacetime

 radiating from all mass.

 

To summarize,

 the total energy

 Et = M + E + S

 or (rewritten as)

 Et = Em + Ep + Es

 

 is made from 3 types of energy:

 (Rest) Mass energy (Em=m*(c^2)) is a particle;

 Photon energy (Ep=h*f) is a wave_particle duality; &

 Space energy (Es=s/(c^3) is only a wave (not a particle at all) (=all wave);

 

 where I’ve defined space

 s=E*(c^3)

 as energy E multiplied by light_speed c to the 3^rd exponent;

 so that mass

 m=s/(c^5)

 is space s

 divided by light_speed c to the 5^th exponent.

 

The universe is radiating or expanding from mass to space

 via photon_decay in the magnetic_dipoles (that are) holding the atom together.

 

An orbit, a dark_matter halo and an event_Horizon

 are continually radiating standing waves

 of the gravitational_field of Spacetime.

 

Particles & lowest energy waves

 simply follow Newton’s (& Euler’s) 3 motion laws.

 

Time and space and gravitational mass (Wt=m*g)

 are relative

 because they are aspects

 of mass radiating it’s field

 into a larger combined radiating field.

 

Depending on your speed

 (relative to the surrounding)

 changed the density relationship

 which is the basis of relativity.

 

Radiating waves into a field

 & increasing speed

 desynchronizes the field

 by increasing density

 of the field nearby

 slowing the ability to radiate into a more dense medium

 slowing time

 and increasing relative mass

 and constricting relative length.

 

So with that understanding,

 space does not violate any laws

 & has to obey the speed of the gravitational field (wave).

 

That is because in this concept,

 a gravitational wave

 is a ripple of Spacetime,

 not a ripple in Spacetime.

 

So, by overlaying General relativity

 (also) with a radiating field from all mass(es)

 in static equalibrium

 and having these fields follow Newton’s 3 laws of motion,

 that then helps me to understand the universe’s actions better (=more thoroughly or completely) than without.

So with my theory I understand 100% of the universe,

 (but) with the current way only 5% of the universe was understood.

Expanding N.E.T. Wave theory 

 all forces use energy and space follows the laws. 

 

With current thinking:

 energy spontaneously appears in vacuum energy,

 orbits are perpetual motion machines,

 atoms are perpetual motion machines

 and magnetic fields are perpetual motion machines.

Space is outside the laws.

 

Yes it is embarrassing that a dentist (such as I) has to step in

 and straighten out theoretical physics’ universe;

 & solve the formula Einstein could not.

Einstein said he was not smart enough

 to figure it out,

 spent 30 years trying and died not knowing.

Please answer me this: What have you done as your 2nd job?

I’ve been trying to solve the universe’s mysteries, & (I) believe I have succeeded.

E.g. My concept of:

 while Spacetime increases, the fabric of space radiates from all mass

 = A decrease in the energy in the magnetic dipoles in mass*(c^3).

s=E*(c^3)=m*(c^5).

Dark_energy = (F=m*a) Newton’s 2nd law

Dark_matter and gravity = Newton’s 2nd law because Newton’s 3 laws of motion

 apply to the waves of Spacetime, not just particles.

 

 

 

2017_11_13_0031_SFN_Dr_Turner’s_NET_Physics_2017 11 13 0035 PS Wi.docx

Edited November 13, 2017 by Capiert