Wormhole Metric...... How is this screwed up.

[swansont]

2 hours ago, SuperPolymath said:

When subatomic particle waves of the protons interact, they feed each other their collective material, collapsing wave functions. Like bug rips & big bangs in the microverses of most all subatomic particles. 

The neutron flies apart because, as I said, it's between the up quark  & down quarks matter jets @ poles of the BH atom held together entirely by it's gravity underneath or adjacent to the proton quasar discs.

Gravity is a lot stronger near the planck scale, resembling bthe other forces of the  quantum world in it's  strength:

https://phys.org/news/2009-05-mini-black-holes.amp

!

Moderator Note

You were told to not post pet/alternative theories here, or anywhere but their own thread. You also said you wouldn't post in this thread again. Now I'm making that required - stay out of this thread.

 

[Vmedvil]

In any case, now the models look something like this with the SNF's,WNF's, and EM's Energy-mass along with wave and particle forms simultaneously of them, without Anderson's Precession. (WNF = Lines)(SNF = Green)(EM = Yellow)(Gravity = Orange)(All Merged = red)(EM + SNF + Gravity = Dark Orange)(EM + Gravity = Light Orange)

Without Rotation with Anderson's Precession.

 

 

Couldn't do both in a animation at the same time correctly, it lags too much for watchers and doesn't take in the true values of both effects, but looked like this, the longer you look the image it gets closer to both effects being correct....... because of lag in your video processing, starting in Ultra slow motion then going slightly faster and faster as it loads/renders it, I tested this with my laptop and it does over time, but never fully renders.

 

 

Edited December 2, 2017 by Vmedvil

[Vmedvil]

Furthermore (Particle = Pixelation)(Wave = Ripple)(Rotation = Movements in circles)(Preccession = Vibration)

More of any of these means greater magnitude or more dominate of that effect.

Edited December 2, 2017 by Vmedvil

[Mordred]

That looks good you doing these on the mathematica or Wolfram?

[Vmedvil]

34 minutes ago, Mordred said:

That looks good you doing these on the mathematica or Wolfram?

Lunapic after calculating the number of magnitude from the equation to do it as, like preccession and rotation were 1, while SNF = 30, EM = 1, and WNF .7 while gravity is some screw up  low number, while Pixelation and ripple are 1, I couldn't do 1/2 for both of them wouldn't let me same with precession and rotation, but 

ω_s - ω_p = 0 ,ω_s + ω_p  = 2 along with Wave - Particle = 0 , Wave + Particle = 2

and k = 553 , which means there is a very strong curvature compared to the others like a BH.

But this solved in a weird way does = 2

ħ/ Δ_x Δ_ῥ = 2

and 

2π/Δt + 2π/Δt = 4π/2Δt = 2π/Δt

as 

ω = 2π/Δt = 2πf

Edited December 2, 2017 by Vmedvil

[Vmedvil]

Lie Groups

S = 3

S = 7

 

S= 20

 

Edited December 2, 2017 by Vmedvil

[Vmedvil]

Until this moment this has been a hypothesis, Now Theory it goes because of Evidence, because of how the scientific method works.

 

Proof that as mass of the BH grows spin increases.

BH Spin Near Speed of Light  C- C = 0

Proof that GR is correct for Warping of Static Space-time.

Einstein's Tensor Confirmed by light bending.

Proof that SR is correct for Non-Static Warping of Moving Object's Time and Space.

Atomic Clock Measures Time Dilation.

Proof the QM is correct for Static Particles with spins.

Three Experiments that Show Quantum Mechanics is Real

Proof that Schwarzchild Metric is correct for Static BH, Radius.

Radius of BH Measured

Proof that Kerr Metric for Spinning BH is correct.

Black-hole Spin Measured

Proof of Quantum field theory or Standard model with Higgs is correct. 

Higgs Boson Found

String Theory Proof with Multiple Universes

Cosmic CMB Change Cold Spot

Proof of uncertainty principle with causality connections upon spin.

Information Transfer Synced spin states "Wormhole Proof"

Proof of Strong Interaction in all matter fields.

Binding Energy of SNF in anti-matter measured

Proof of Gravitational Precession from stellar masses.

Earth's Precession

Proof that Dark matter exists.

Dark Matter's Gravity found

Proof of Dark Energy and Hubble's Constant being correct.

Expanding Universe Proof

Proof of Neutrino's existence 

Neutrinos Measured

Proof of Higher Order Particles existence along with decay of those.

Muon Lifetime measured

Proof of electromagnetism 

Electromagnetic Transmission Tesla Coil

Proof of Gravitation waves from orbiting masses.

Gravitational Waves Discovered/measured

Graviton existence proof with non zero mass.

Graviton found

Proof of Matter and Antimatter Annihilation into photons.

Annihilation experiment

Proof that matter can escape a BH at large sizes "relativistic Jet"

Active Galaxy SMBH

Proof of Wavelike Bosons

Photon Double slit Experiment

Proof of Tachyonic Movement beyond C under certain conditions, Open D-brane proof.

Speed of QE 10,000x light measurement.

Proof of Matter ionization during Black hole digestion.

Infrared Echoes

Proof that Consumed matter has SNF broken along photons can escape BH.

X-ray Beam BH

Proof of BH Magnetic Field, Proof of internal spinning charges. 

BH Magnetic Field found

Edited December 2, 2017 by Vmedvil

[Vmedvil]

Proof of Wavelike Gravity

Wavelike Behavior Gravity Witnessed

Proof of Relativistic Mass and Gravitational attraction of it along with vibration of Gravitational waves, wavelike

Two BH Collision

Proof of Planck Scale measurements being smallest along with Planck's constant.

Measurement of Planck's Constant

 

In any case, that is 30 experimental proofs of this model being accurate to "Real" Universe.

∇'(x,y,z,t,ω_s,ω_p,M,I,k,φ,S,X,Z,u) = ((ħω_s)((|(Log_{(DgDaDψDφ-W)}(((2ħG/ε₀ μ₀))R_s - (1/4)F^a_μvF^aμv + i(ψ-bar)γ^μD_μψⁱ +(ψ-bar)ⁱ_LV_ijφψ^j_r + (a_ji) - V(φ)/-D_μ²)|)-e^2S(r,t)/h)) - (M_bω_s(G_uv - R_uv/-g_uv)^1/2 + (S²/ (3GM_b/2(1/ε₀ μ₀)²R_s³(R_p v_p)+GI_s/(1/ε₀ μ₀)R_s(3R_p/R_s²(ω_pR_p) - ω_p))²)R_s²/2)((|(Log_{(DgDaDψDφ-W)}((((2ħG/ε₀ μ₀))R_s -(1/4)F^a_μvF^aμv + i(ψ-bar)γ^μD_μψⁱ +(ψ-bar)ⁱ_LV_ijφψ^j_r + (a_ji) - V(φ)/-D_μ²)|)-e^2S(r,t)/h))) / (ħ²/2M_b)((|(Log_{(DgDaDψDφ-W)}((  ((2ħG/ε₀ μ₀))R_s - (1/4)F^a_μvF^aμv + i(ψ-bar)γ^μD_μψⁱ +(ψ-bar)ⁱ_LV_ijφψ^j_r + ((a_ji)) - V(φ)/-D_μ²)|)-e^2S(r,t)/h)))^1/2(((1-(((2M_bG / R_s) - (I_sω_s(G_uv - R_uv/-g_uv)^1/2 + (S²/ (3GM_b/2(1/ε₀ μ₀)²R_s³(R_p v_p)+G(I_s)/(1/ε₀ μ₀)R_s(3R_p/R_s²(ω_pR_p) - ω_p))²))/2M_b)+ (((8πG/3)((g/(2π)³)∫(p² + ((A_r(X) + (E_bx ε₀ μ₀ /m_u) - A_r(X^Z+)/Z) / m_u)²)^(1/2)(1/e^{((E - μ)/T)}±1)(ħω_s  + ħω_s)) - ((k_sR_s²/ε₀ μ₀)) + (G_uv - R_uv/-g_uv))^1/2(ΔKiloparsec)))²/(1/ε₀ μ₀)))^1/2)

∑∇'/Δt = ∇'₁/Δt₁ + ∇'₂/Δt₂ + ∇'₃/Δt₃ + ... + ∇'_n/Δt_n

∑∇'/Δt = (Δ'/Δt)

Energy of Graviton Wave

E_s = ħω_s

Energy of Gravitational Wave 

E_p = ħω_p

Quanta Counter for Energy-mass of a body at every point from radius.

∑I_s  =  M₁R₁² + M₂R₂²  + M₃R₃²  + ... + M_nR_n²

Edited December 2, 2017 by Vmedvil

[Mordred]

Lol well if you tried publishing the math in that clunky format it won't go anywhere. Might be my best recommendation I can possibly give. Fix that math above as it is incredibly ugly. As is it its barely legible. You told me before you know how to latex. Start there then look at how to reduce and better organize that expression.

As it is I am certainly not going to waste any effort trying to decipher it.

PS make sure it passes Dimensional analysis. Both Dubbelosix and I both mentioned this critically important detail. You will also require the mathematical proofs to your equation.

 

Edited December 3, 2017 by Mordred

[Vmedvil]

15 hours ago, Mordred said:

Lol well if you tried publishing the math in that clunky format it won't go anywhere. Might be my best recommendation I can possibly give. Fix that math above as it is incredibly ugly. As is it its barely legible. You told me before you know how to latex. Start there then look at how to reduce and better organize that expression.

As it is I am certainly not going to waste any effort trying to decipher it.

PS make sure it passes Dimensional analysis. Both Dubbelosix and I both mentioned this critically important detail. You will also require the mathematical proofs to your equation.

 

Well, my Equation  is just four current SR, so that is easy if C-C = 0, and if all the others passed then this one does as substitution was just used. 

Where this is about to go through another Transform because of Swan's misunderstanding of momentum, plus it removes it from the equation.

Transform E² = M²C⁴ + p²C²   Reverse solve for p²  = (E² - M²C⁴  / C²)

∇'(x,y,z,t,ω_s,ω_p,M,I,k,φ,S,X,Z,u) = ((ħω_s)((|(Log_{(DgDaDψDφ-W)}(((2ħG/ε₀ μ₀))R_s - (1/4)F^a_μvF^aμv + i(ψ-bar)γ^μD_μψⁱ +(ψ-bar)ⁱ_LV_ijφψ^j_r + (a_ji) - V(φ)/-D_μ²)|)-e^2S(r,t)/h)) - (M_bω_s(G_uv - R_uv/-g_uv)^1/2 + (S²/ (3GM_b/2(1/ε₀ μ₀)²R_s³(R_p v_p)+GI_s/(1/ε₀ μ₀)R_s(3R_p/R_s²(ω_pR_p) - ω_p))²)R_s²/2)((|(Log_{(DgDaDψDφ-W)}((((2ħG/ε₀ μ₀))R_s -(1/4)F^a_μvF^aμv + i(ψ-bar)γ^μD_μψⁱ +(ψ-bar)ⁱ_LV_ijφψ^j_r + (a_ji) - V(φ)/-D_μ²)|)-e^2S(r,t)/h))) / (ħ²/2M_b)((|(Log_{(DgDaDψDφ-W)}((  ((2ħG/ε₀ μ₀))R_s - (1/4)F^a_μvF^aμv + i(ψ-bar)γ^μD_μψⁱ +(ψ-bar)ⁱ_LV_ijφψ^j_r + ((a_ji)) - V(φ)/-D_μ²)|)-e^2S(r,t)/h)))^1/2(((1-(((2M_bG / R_s) - (I_sω_s(G_uv - R_uv/-g_uv)^1/2 + (S²/ (3GM_b/2(1/ε₀ μ₀)²R_s³(R_p v_p)+G(I_s)/(1/ε₀ μ₀)R_s(3R_p/R_s²(ω_pR_p) - ω_p))²))/2M_b)+ (((8πG/3)((g/(2π)³)∫(((E_relativistic² - M_b²C⁴) / C²) + ((A_r(X) + (E_{Nucleon binding SNF} ε₀ μ₀ /m_u) - A_r(X^Z+)/Z) / m_u)²)^(1/2)(1/e^{((E - μ)/T)}±1)(ħω_s  + ħω_s)) - ((k_sR_s²/ε₀ μ₀)) + (G_uv - R_uv/-g_uv))^1/2(ΔKiloparsec)))²/(1/ε₀ μ₀)))^1/2)

∑∇'/Δt = ∇'₁/Δt₁ + ∇'₂/Δt₂ + ∇'₃/Δt₃ + ... + ∇'_n/Δt_n

∑∇'/Δt = (Δ'/Δt)

Energy of Graviton Wave

E_s = ħω_s

Energy of Gravitational Wave 

E_p = ħω_p

Quanta Counter for Energy-mass of a body at every point from radius.

∑I_s  =  M₁R₁² + M₂R₂²  + M₃R₃²  + ... + M_nR_n²

Now does C² are getting put back in

Detransform.

 

∇'(x,y,z,t,ω_s,ω_p,M,I,k,φ,S,X,Z,u) = ((ħω_s)((|(Log_{(DgDaDψDφ-W)}(((2ħGC²))R_s - (1/4)F^a_μvF^aμv + i(ψ-bar)γ^μD_μψⁱ +(ψ-bar)ⁱ_LV_ijφψ^j_r + (a_ji) - V(φ)/-D_μ²)|)-e^2S(r,t)/h)) - (M_bω_s(G_uv - R_uv/-g_uv)^1/2 + (S²/ (3GM_b/2C⁴R_s³(R_p v_p)+GI_s/C²R_s(3R_p/R_s²(ω_pR_p) - ω_p))²)R_s²/2)((|(Log_{(DgDaDψDφ-W)}((((2ħGC²))R_s -(1/4)F^a_μvF^aμv + i(ψ-bar)γ^μD_μψⁱ +(ψ-bar)ⁱ_LV_ijφψ^j_r + (a_ji) - V(φ)/-D_μ²)|)-e^2S(r,t)/h))) / (ħ²/2M_b)((|(Log_{(DgDaDψDφ-W)}((  ((2ħGC²))R_s - (1/4)F^a_μvF^aμv + i(ψ-bar)γ^μD_μψⁱ +(ψ-bar)ⁱ_LV_ijφψ^j_r + ((a_ji)) - V(φ)/-D_μ²)|)-e^2S(r,t)/h)))^1/2(((1-(((2M_bG / R_s) - (I_sω_s(G_uv - R_uv/-g_uv)^1/2 + (S²/ (3GM_b/2C⁴R_s³(R_p v_p)+G(I_s)/(1/ε₀ μ₀)R_s(3R_p/R_s²(ω_pR_p) - ω_p))²))/2M_b)+ (((8πG/3)((g/(2π)³)∫(((E_relativistic² - M_b²C⁴) / C²) + ((A_r(X) + (E_{Nucleon binding SNF} ε₀ μ₀ /m_u) - A_r(X^Z+)/Z) / m_u)²)^(1/2)(1/e^{((E - μ)/T)}±1)(ħω_s  + ħω_s)) - ((k_sR_s²C²)) + (G_uv - R_uv/-g_uv))^1/2(ΔKiloparsec)))²/(C²)))^1/2)

 

∑∇'/Δt = ∇'₁/Δt₁ + ∇'₂/Δt₂ + ∇'₃/Δt₃ + ... + ∇'_n/Δt_n

∑∇'/Δt = (Δ'/Δt)

Energy of Graviton Wave

E_s = ħω_s

Energy of Gravitational Wave 

E_p = ħω_p

Quanta Counter for Energy-mass of a body at every point from radius.

∑I_s  =  M₁R₁² + M₂R₂²  + M₃R₃²  + ... + M_nR_n²

Edited December 3, 2017 by Vmedvil

[Vmedvil]

Missed one

∇'(x,y,z,t,ω_s,ω_p,M,I,k,φ,S,X,Z,u) = ((ħω_s)((|(Log_{(DgDaDψDφ-W)}(((2ħGC²))R_s - (1/4)F^a_μvF^aμv + i(ψ-bar)γ^μD_μψⁱ +(ψ-bar)ⁱ_LV_ijφψ^j_r + (a_ji) - V(φ)/-D_μ²)|)-e^2S(r,t)/h)) - (M_bω_s(G_uv - R_uv/-g_uv)^1/2 + (S²/ (3GM_b/2C⁴R_s³(R_p v_p)+GI_s/C²R_s(3R_p/R_s²(ω_pR_p) - ω_p))²)R_s²/2)((|(Log_{(DgDaDψDφ-W)}((((2ħGC²))R_s -(1/4)F^a_μvF^aμv + i(ψ-bar)γ^μD_μψⁱ +(ψ-bar)ⁱ_LV_ijφψ^j_r + (a_ji) - V(φ)/-D_μ²)|)-e^2S(r,t)/h))) / (ħ²/2M_b)((|(Log_{(DgDaDψDφ-W)}((  ((2ħGC²))R_s - (1/4)F^a_μvF^aμv + i(ψ-bar)γ^μD_μψⁱ +(ψ-bar)ⁱ_LV_ijφψ^j_r + ((a_ji)) - V(φ)/-D_μ²)|)-e^2S(r,t)/h)))^1/2(((1-(((2M_bG / R_s) - (I_sω_s(G_uv - R_uv/-g_uv)^1/2 + (S²/ (3GM_b/2C⁴R_s³(R_p v_p)+G(I_s)/C²R_s(3R_p/R_s²(ω_pR_p) - ω_p))²))/2M_b)+ (((8πG/3)((g/(2π)³)∫(((E_relativistic² - M_b²C⁴) / C²) + ((A_r(X) + (E_{Nucleon binding SNF} ε₀ μ₀ /m_u) - A_r(X^Z+)/Z) / m_u)²)^(1/2)(1/e^{((E - μ)/T)}±1)(ħω_s  + ħω_s)) - ((k_sR_s²C²)) + (G_uv - R_uv/-g_uv))^1/2(ΔKiloparsec)))²/(C²)))^1/2)

Which I almost want to take all those M_b  reverse solved E = MC²  as E_rest  which I think I will (E_rest/C²)  = M_b

∇'(x,y,z,t,ω_s,ω_p,M,I,k,φ,S,X,Z,u) = ((ħω_s)((|(Log_{(DgDaDψDφ-W)}(((2ħGC²))R_s - (1/4)F^a_μvF^aμv + i(ψ-bar)γ^μD_μψⁱ +(ψ-bar)ⁱ_LV_ijφψ^j_r + (a_ji) - V(φ)/-D_μ²)|)-e^2S(r,t)/h)) - ((E_rest/C²)ω_s(G_uv - R_uv/-g_uv)^1/2 + (S²/ (3G(E_rest/C²)/2C⁴R_s³(R_p v_p)+GI_s/C²R_s(3R_p/R_s²(ω_pR_p) - ω_p))²)R_s²/2)((|(Log_{(DgDaDψDφ-W)}((((2ħGC²))R_s -(1/4)F^a_μvF^aμv + i(ψ-bar)γ^μD_μψⁱ +(ψ-bar)ⁱ_LV_ijφψ^j_r + (a_ji) - V(φ)/-D_μ²)|)-e^2S(r,t)/h))) / (ħ²/2(E_rest/C²))((|(Log_{(DgDaDψDφ-W)}((  ((2ħGC²))R_s - (1/4)F^a_μvF^aμv + i(ψ-bar)γ^μD_μψⁱ +(ψ-bar)ⁱ_LV_ijφψ^j_r + ((a_ji)) - V(φ)/-D_μ²)|)-e^2S(r,t)/h)))^1/2(((1-(((2(E_rest/C²)G / R_s) - (I_sω_s(G_uv - R_uv/-g_uv)^1/2 + (S²/ (3G(E_rest/C²)/2C⁴R_s³(R_p v_p)+G(I_s)/C²R_s(3R_p/R_s²(ω_pR_p) - ω_p))²))/2(E_rest/C²))+ (((8πG/3)((g/(2π)³)∫(((E_relativistic² - (E_rest/C²)²C⁴) / C²) + ((A_r(X) + (E_{Nucleon binding SNF} ε₀ μ₀ /m_u) - A_r(X^Z+)/Z) / m_u)²)^(1/2)(1/e^{((E - μ)/T)}±1)(ħω_s  + ħω_s)) - ((k_sR_s²C²)) + (G_uv - R_uv/-g_uv))^1/2(ΔKiloparsec)))²/(C²)))^1/2)

 

Mordred in your equation what was 1/e^{((E - μ)/T)}±1  what was E defining there.

Figured it out

∇'(x,y,z,t,ω_s,ω_p,M,I,k,φ,S,X,Z,u) = ((ħω_s)((|(Log_{(DgDaDψDφ-W)}(((2ħGC²))R_s - (1/4)F^a_μvF^aμv + i(ψ-bar)γ^μD_μψⁱ +(ψ-bar)ⁱ_LV_ijφψ^j_r + (a_ji) - V(φ)/-D_μ²)|)-e^2S(r,t)/h)) - ((E_rest/C²)ω_s(G_uv - R_uv/-g_uv)^1/2 + (S²/ (3G(E_rest/C²)/2C⁴R_s³(R_p v_p)+GI_s/C²R_s(3R_p/R_s²(ω_pR_p) - ω_p))²)R_s²/2)((|(Log_{(DgDaDψDφ-W)}((((2ħGC²))R_s -(1/4)F^a_μvF^aμv + i(ψ-bar)γ^μD_μψⁱ +(ψ-bar)ⁱ_LV_ijφψ^j_r + (a_ji) - V(φ)/-D_μ²)|)-e^2S(r,t)/h))) / (ħ²/2(E_rest/C²))((|(Log_{(DgDaDψDφ-W)}((  ((2ħGC²))R_s - (1/4)F^a_μvF^aμv + i(ψ-bar)γ^μD_μψⁱ +(ψ-bar)ⁱ_LV_ijφψ^j_r + ((a_ji)) - V(φ)/-D_μ²)|)-e^2S(r,t)/h)))^1/2(((1-(((2(E_rest/C²)G / R_s) - (I_sω_s(G_uv - R_uv/-g_uv)^1/2 + (S²/ (3G(E_rest/C²)/2C⁴R_s³(R_p v_p)+G(I_s)/C²R_s(3R_p/R_s²(ω_pR_p) - ω_p))²))/2(E_rest/C²))+ (((8πG/3)((g/(2π)³)∫(((E_relativistic² - (E_rest/C²)²C⁴) / C²) + ((A_r(X) + (E_{Nucleon binding SNF} ε₀ μ₀ /m_u) - A_r(X^Z+)/Z) / m_u)²)^(1/2)(1/e^{((ERelativistic  - μchemical)/TMatter)}±1)(ħω_s  + ħω_s)) - ((k_sR_s²C²)) + (G_uv - R_uv/-g_uv))^1/2(ΔKiloparsec)))²/(C²)))^1/2)

 

 

∑∇'/Δt = ∇'₁/Δt₁ + ∇'₂/Δt₂ + ∇'₃/Δt₃ + ... + ∇'_n/Δt_n

∑∇'/Δt = (Δ'/Δt)

Energy of Graviton Wave

E_s = ħω_s

Energy of Gravitational Wave 

E_p = ħω_p

Quanta Counter for Energy-mass of a body at every point from radius.

∑I_s  =  (E_rest/C²)₁R₁² + (E_rest/C²)₂R₂²  + (E_rest/C²)₃R₃²  + ... + (E_rest/C²)_nR_n²

Einstein Tensor to Angular velocity of rotation.

ω_s = -1/(I_s(G_uv - R_uv/-g_uv)^1/2 + (E_rest/C²)(G_uv - R_uv/-g_uv)^1/2)

Cancel

∇'(x,y,z,t,ω_s,ω_p,M,I,k,φ,S,X,Z,u) = ((ħω_s)((|(Log_{(DgDaDψDφ-W)}(((2ħGC²))R_s - (1/4)F^a_μvF^aμv + i(ψ-bar)γ^μD_μψⁱ +(ψ-bar)ⁱ_LV_ijφψ^j_r + (a_ji) - V(φ)/-D_μ²)|)-e^2S(r,t)/h)) - ((E_rest/C²)ω_s(G_uv - R_uv/-g_uv)^1/2 + (S²/ (3G(E_rest/C²)/2C⁴R_s³(R_p v_p)+GI_s/C²R_s(3R_p/R_s²(ω_pR_p) - ω_p))²)R_s²/2)((|(Log_{(DgDaDψDφ-W)}((((2ħGC²))R_s -(1/4)F^a_μvF^aμv + i(ψ-bar)γ^μD_μψⁱ +(ψ-bar)ⁱ_LV_ijφψ^j_r + (a_ji) - V(φ)/-D_μ²)|)-e^2S(r,t)/h))) / (ħ²/2(E_rest/C²))((|(Log_{(DgDaDψDφ-W)}((  ((2ħGC²))R_s - (1/4)F^a_μvF^aμv + i(ψ-bar)γ^μD_μψⁱ +(ψ-bar)ⁱ_LV_ijφψ^j_r + ((a_ji)) - V(φ)/-D_μ²)|)-e^2S(r,t)/h)))^1/2(((1-(((2(E_rest/C²)G / R_s) - (I_sω_s(G_uv - R_uv/-g_uv)^1/2 + (S²/ (3G(E_rest/C²)/2C⁴R_s³(R_p v_p)+G(I_s)/C²R_s(3R_p/R_s²(ω_pR_p) - ω_p))²))/2(E_rest/C²))+ (((8πG/3)((g/(2π)³)∫(((E_relativistic² - E_rest² / C²) + ((A_r(X) + (E_{Nucleon binding SNF} ε₀ μ₀ /m_u) - A_r(X^Z+)/Z) / m_u)²)^(1/2)(1/e^{((ERelativistic  - μchemical)/TMatter)}±1)(ħω_s  + ħω_s)) - ((k_sR_s²C²)) + (G_uv - R_uv/-g_uv))^1/2(ΔKiloparsec)))²/(C²)))^1/2)

 

 

∑∇'/Δt = ∇'₁/Δt₁ + ∇'₂/Δt₂ + ∇'₃/Δt₃ + ... + ∇'_n/Δt_n

∑∇'/Δt = (Δ'/Δt)

Energy of Graviton Wave

E_s = ħω_s

Energy of Gravitational Wave 

E_p = ħω_p

Quanta Counter for Energy-mass of a body at every point from radius.

∑I_s  =  (E_rest/C²)₁R₁² + (E_rest/C²)₂R₂²  + (E_rest/C²)₃R₃²  + ... + (E_rest/C²)_nR_n²

Einstein Tensor to Angular velocity of rotation.

ω_s = -1/(I_s(G_uv - R_uv/-g_uv)^1/2 + (E_rest/C²)(G_uv - R_uv/-g_uv)^1/2)

Edited December 3, 2017 by Vmedvil

[Vmedvil]

I think these two terms may cancel but I cannot tell, I will have to latex this now.

∇'(x,y,z,t,ω_s,ω_p,M,I,k,φ,S,X,Z,u) = ((ħω_s)((|(Log_{(DgDaDψDφ-W)}(((2ħGC²))R_s - (1/4)F^a_μvF^aμv + i(ψ-bar)γ^μD_μψⁱ +(ψ-bar)ⁱ_LV_ijφψ^j_r + (a_ji) - V(φ)/-D_μ²)|)-e^2S(r,t)/h)) - ((E_rest/C²)ω_s(G_uv - R_uv/-g_uv)^1/2 + (S²/ (3G(E_rest/C²)/2C⁴R_s³(R_p v_p)+GI_s/C²R_s(3R_p/R_s²(ω_pR_p) - ω_p))²)R_s²/2)((|(Log_{(DgDaDψDφ-W)}((((2ħGC²))R_s -(1/4)F^a_μvF^aμv + i(ψ-bar)γ^μD_μψⁱ +(ψ-bar)ⁱ_LV_ijφψ^j_r + (a_ji) - V(φ)/-D_μ²)|)-e^2S(r,t)/h))) / (ħ²/2(E_rest/C²))((|(Log_{(DgDaDψDφ-W)}((  ((2ħGC²))R_s - (1/4)F^a_μvF^aμv + i(ψ-bar)γ^μD_μψⁱ +(ψ-bar)ⁱ_LV_ijφψ^j_r + ((a_ji)) - V(φ)/-D_μ²)|)-e^2S(r,t)/h)))^1/2(((1-(((2(E_rest/C²)G / R_s) - (I_sω_s(G_uv - R_uv/-g_uv)^1/2 + (S²/ (3G(E_rest/C²)/2C⁴R_s³(R_p v_p)+G(I_s)/C²R_s(3R_p/R_s²(ω_pR_p) - ω_p))²))/2(E_rest/C²))+ (((8πG/3)((g/(2π)³)∫(((E_relativistic² - E_rest² / C²) + ((A_r(X) + (E_{Nucleon binding SNF} ε₀ μ₀ /m_u) - A_r(X^Z+)/Z) / m_u)²)^(1/2)(1/e^{((ERelativistic  - μchemical)/TMatter)}±1)(ħω_s  + ħω_s)) - ((k_sR_s²C²)) + (G_uv - R_uv/-g_uv))^1/2(ΔKiloparsec)))²/(C²)))^1/2)

 

Ya, I official hate this forums latex for instantly not accepting it in other sizes. 

 

Ya, no it is not getting latexed here.

Edited December 3, 2017 by Vmedvil

[Mordred]

It takes a bit of effort to get used to the latex structure here. We have a testing area to get used to it

http://www.scienceforums.net/forum/99-the-sandbox/

If you want write up the latex string under Office or whatever format your used to and I will give you a hand with it.

[Strange]

There is an interactive Latex editor that can help with getting the code right before copying it here: http://www.codecogs.com/latex/eqneditor.php

[Vmedvil]

[math] \nabla ' (x,y,z,\omega_s,\omega_p,E,I,k_s,\phi,S,X,Z,\mu)= \sqrt {\hbar \omega_s Log_{(DgDaD \psi D \phi -W)}(| \frac{2 \hbar G C^2 R_s - \frac{1}{4} F^a_{\mu v} F^{a \mu v} +i (\psi bar)\gamma^{\mu}D_{\mu}\psi^{i} +(\psi bar)^{i}_{L}V_{ij}\phi \psi^{j}_{r} + a_{ij} - V(\phi)}{-D_\mu}|)(-e^{\frac{2S(r,t)}{h}}) - \frac{E_{rest}}{C^{2}}\omega_s \sqrt{\frac {G_{uv} - R_{uv}}{g_{uv}}}} [/math]

[math]+ \sqrt{(\frac{(\frac{S^{2}}{\frac{3G\frac{E_{rest}}{C^{2}}}{2C^{2}R_{s}^{3}}}R_{p}v_{p}\frac{GI_{s}}{C^{2}}R_{s}^{3}(\frac{3R_{p}}{R_{s}^{2}}(\omega_{p}R_{p})- \omega_{p}))^{2}R_{s}^{2}}{2})\frac{Log_{(DgDaD \psi D \phi -W)}(| \frac{2 \hbar G C^2 R_s - \frac{1}{4} F^a_{\mu v} F^{a \mu v} +i (\psi bar)\gamma^{\mu}D_{\mu}\psi^{i} +(\psi bar)^{i}_{L}V_{ij}\phi \psi^{j}_{r} + a_{ij} - V(\phi)}{-D_\mu}|)(-e^{\frac{2S(r,t)}{h}})}{\frac{\hbar^{2}(Log_{(DgDaD \psi D \phi -W)}(| \frac{2 \hbar G C^2 R_s - \frac{1}{4} F^a_{\mu v} F^{a \mu v} +i (\psi bar)\gamma^{\mu}D_{\mu}\psi^{i} +(\psi bar)^{i}_{L}V_{ij}\phi \psi^{j}_{r} + a_{ij} - V(\phi)}{-D_\mu}|)(-e^{\frac{2S(r,t)}{h}}))}{2\frac{E_{rest}}{C^{2}}}}}[/math]

Quantum Mechanics Part. 

Edited December 3, 2017 by Vmedvil

[Strange]

5 minutes ago, Vmedvil said:

[\math]

[/math]

I blame Microsoft for people getting their slashes confused!

[Vmedvil]

that about half of it, which that shit does cancel, and I noticed some errors when I typed Anderson equation.

∇'(x,y,z,t,ω_s,ω_p,M,I,k,φ,S,X,Z,u) = ((ħω_s)((|(Log_{(DgDaDψDφ-W)}(((2ħGC²))R_s - (1/4)F^a_μvF^aμv + i(ψ-bar)γ^μD_μψⁱ +(ψ-bar)ⁱ_LV_ijφψ^j_r + (a_ji) - V(φ)/-D_μ²)|)-e^2S(r,t)/h)) - ((E_rest/C²)ω_s(G_uv - R_uv/-g_uv)^1/2 + (S²/ Ω_p))²)R_s²/2))) / (ħ²/2(E_rest/C²))))^1/2(((1-(((2(E_rest/C²)G / R_s) - (I_sω_s(G_uv - R_uv/-g_uv)^1/2 + (S²/Ω_p ))²))/2(E_rest/C²))+ (((8πG/3)((g/(2π)³)∫(((E_relativistic² - E_rest² / C²) + ((A_r(X) + (E_{Nucleon binding SNF} ε₀ μ₀ /m_u) - A_r(X^Z+)/Z) / m_u)²)^(1/2)(1/e^{((ERelativistic  - μchemical)/TMatter)}±1)(ħω_s  + ħω_s)) - ((k_sR_s²C²)) + (G_uv - R_uv/-g_uv))^1/2(ΔKiloparsec)))²/(C²)))^1/2)

Which will now be Ω_p , until I type it again in latex.

Edited December 3, 2017 by Vmedvil

[Mordred]

Are you referring to the Anderson impurity model? Asking as this is one I'm not familiar with.

Much easier to read in the above.

 

[Vmedvil]

and I finally figured out where this ² goes again, which on (S² / Anderson Equation ) ² there is a missing on the latex version but doesn't effect the cancel.

 

∇'(x,y,z,t,ω_s,ω_p,M,I,k,φ,S,X,Z,u) = ((ħω_s)((|(Log_{(DgDaDψDφ-W)}(((2ħGC²))R_s - (1/4)F^a_μvF^aμv + i(ψ-bar)γ^μD_μψⁱ +(ψ-bar)ⁱ_LV_ijφψ^j_r + (a_ji) - V(φ)/-D_μ²)|)-e^2S(r,t)/h)) - ((E_rest/C²)ω_s(G_uv - R_uv/-g_uv)^1/2 + (S²/ Ω_p)²)R_s²/2))) / (ħ²/2(E_rest/C²))))^1/2(((1-(((2(E_rest/C²)G / R_s) - (I_sω_s(G_uv - R_uv/-g_uv)^1/2 + (S²/Ω_p)²))/2(E_rest/C²))+ (((8πG/3)((g/(2π)³)∫(((E_relativistic² - E_rest² / C²) + ((A_r(X) + (E_{Nucleon binding SNF} ε₀ μ₀ /m_u) - A_r(X^Z+)/Z) / m_u)²)^(1/2)(1/e^{((ERelativistic  - μchemical)/TMatter)}±1)(ħω_s  + ħω_s)) - ((k_sR_s²C²)) + (G_uv - R_uv/-g_uv))^1/2(ΔKiloparsec)))²/(C²)))^1/2)

 

and the ² is the result of a transformation error so it will be removed.

∇'(x,y,z,t,ω_s,ω_p,M,I,k,φ,S,X,Z,u) = ((ħω_s)((|(Log_{(DgDaDψDφ-W)}(((2ħGC²))R_s - (1/4)F^a_μvF^aμv + i(ψ-bar)γ^μD_μψⁱ +(ψ-bar)ⁱ_LV_ijφψ^j_r + (a_ji) - V(φ)/-D_μ²)|)-e^2S(r,t)/h)) - ((E_rest/C²)ω_s(G_uv - R_uv/-g_uv)^1/2 + (S²/ Ω_p))R_s²/2))) / (ħ²/2(E_rest/C²))))^1/2(((1-(((2(E_rest/C²)G / R_s) - (I_sω_s(G_uv - R_uv/-g_uv)^1/2 + (S²/Ω_p)))/2(E_rest/C²))+ (((8πG/3)((g/(2π)³)∫(((E_relativistic² - E_rest² / C²) + ((A_r(X) + (E_{Nucleon binding SNF} ε₀ μ₀ /m_u) - A_r(X^Z+)/Z) / m_u)²)^(1/2)(1/e^{((ERelativistic  - μchemical)/TMatter)}±1)(ħω_s  + ħω_s)) - ((k_sR_s²C²)) + (G_uv - R_uv/-g_uv))^1/2(ΔKiloparsec)))²/(C²)))^1/2)

 

After looking back to why the hell it was there, so that latex is right, that squared was wrong.

Edited December 4, 2017 by Vmedvil

[Vmedvil]

Which then changes S's state because of that error from S²  to S.

∇'(x,y,z,t,ω_s,ω_p,M,I,k,φ,S,X,Z,u) = ((ħω_s)((|(Log_{(DgDaDψDφ-W)}(((2ħGC²))R_s - (1/4)F^a_μvF^aμv + i(ψ-bar)γ^μD_μψⁱ +(ψ-bar)ⁱ_LV_ijφψ^j_r + (a_ji) - V(φ)/-D_μ²)|)-e^2S(r,t)/h)) - ((E_rest/C²)ω_s(G_uv - R_uv/-g_uv)^1/2 + (S/ Ω_p))R_s²/2))) / (ħ²/2(E_rest/C²))))^1/2(((1-(((2(E_rest/C²)G / R_s) - (I_sω_s(G_uv - R_uv/-g_uv)^1/2 + (S/Ω_p)))/2(E_rest/C²))+ (((8πG/3)((g/(2π)³)∫(((E_relativistic² - E_rest² / C²) + ((A_r(X) + (E_{Nucleon binding SNF} ε₀ μ₀ /m_u) - A_r(X^Z+)/Z) / m_u)²)^(1/2)(1/e^{((ERelativistic  - μchemical)/TMatter)}±1)(ħω_s  + ħω_s) - (k_sR_s²C²) + (G_uv - R_uv/-g_uv)^1/2(ΔKiloparsec)))²/(C²)))^1/2)

So that latex is wrong as S is not squared.

[math] \nabla ' (x,y,z,\omega_{s},\omega_{p},M,I,k,\phi,S,X,Z,\mu) = \sqrt{\hbar \omega_{s}(|Log_{(DgDa D \psi D \phi - W)}(\frac{2 \hbar G C^{2}R_{s} - \frac{1}{4}F^{a}_{\mu v}F^{a \mu v } + i(\psi bar)\gamma^{\mu}D_{\mu}\psi_{i} + (\psi bar)^{i}_{L}V_{ij}\phi \psi^{j}_{r} + a_{ij} - V(\phi)}{-D^{2}_{\mu}}|)(-e^{\frac{2S(r,t)}{h}}) - \frac {E_{Rest}}{C^{2}} \omega_{s} \sqrt{\frac{G_{uv} - R_{uv}}{-g_{uv}}} + {\frac{\frac{S R^{2}_{s}}{\Omega_{p}}}{2}}{\hbar^{2 \frac{E_{rest}}{C^{2}}}}}[/math]

The box is too short but here it is now Simplified and corrected. the QM part.

Edited December 4, 2017 by Vmedvil

[Vmedvil]

Forgot a 2 

[math] \nabla ' (x,y,z,\omega_{s},\omega_{p},M,I,k,\phi,S,X,Z,\mu) = \sqrt{\hbar \omega_{s}(|Log_{(DgDa D \psi D \phi - W)}(\frac{2 \hbar G C^{2}R_{s} - \frac{1}{4}F^{a}_{\mu v}F^{a \mu v } + i(\psi bar)\gamma^{\mu}D_{\mu}\psi_{i} + (\psi bar)^{i}_{L}V_{ij}\phi \psi^{j}_{r} + a_{ij} - V(\phi)}{-D^{2}_{\mu}}|)(-e^{\frac{2S(r,t)}{h}}) - \frac {E_{Rest}}{C^{2}} \omega_{s} \sqrt{\frac{G_{uv} - R_{uv}}{-g_{uv}}} + {\frac{\frac{S R^{2}_{s}}{\Omega_{p}}}{2}}{{ \frac{2E_{rest}}{\hbar^{2}C^{2}}}}}[/math]

Those fractions are not displaying correctly and I don't know where it is screwed up I will rewrite it in latex tomorrow. 

Edited December 4, 2017 by Vmedvil

[Vmedvil]

No others Errors were found, Precession. 

Ω_p  = (((3G(E_rest/C²))/2C²R_s³)(R_pV_p) + (GI_s/C²R_s³)(3R_p/R_s²(ω_p R_p) -ω_p ))

Transform back correctly, had to check the entire equation after one mistake was noticed there are no others, neither Ω_p or S should have been ²  as m_k should not have been.

∇'(x,y,z,t,ω_s,ω_p,M,I,k,φ,S,X,Z,u) = ((ħω_s)((|(Log_{(DgDaDψDφ-W)}(((2ħGC²))R_s - (1/4)F^a_μvF^aμv + i(ψ-bar)γ^μD_μψⁱ +(ψ-bar)ⁱ_LV_ijφψ^j_r + (a_ji) - V(φ)/-D_μ²)|)-e^2S(r,t)/h)) - ((E_rest/C²)ω_s(G_uv - R_uv/-g_uv)^1/2 + (S/ (((3G(E_rest/C²))/2C²R_s³)(R_pV_p) + (GI_s/C²R_s³)((3R_p/R_s²)(ω_p R_p) -ω_p ))))R_s²/2))) / (ħ²/2(E_rest/C²))))^1/2(((1-(((2(E_rest/C²)G / R_s) - (I_sω_s(G_uv - R_uv/-g_uv)^1/2 + (S/(((3G(E_rest/C²))/2C²R_s³)(R_pV_p) + (GI_s/C²R_s³)((3R_p/R_s²)(ω_p R_p) -ω_p )))))/2(E_rest/C²))+ (((8πG/3)((g/(2π)³)∫(((E_relativistic² - E_rest² / C²) + ((A_r(X) + (E_{Nucleon binding SNF} ε₀ μ₀ /m_u) - A_r(X^Z+)/Z) / m_u)²)^(1/2)(1/e^{((ERelativistic  - μchemical)/TMatter)}±1)(ħω_s  + ħω_s) - (k_sR_s²C²) + (G_uv - R_uv/-g_uv)^1/2(ΔKiloparsec)))²/(C²)))^1/2)

Edited December 4, 2017 by Vmedvil

[Vmedvil]

Which photons not having mass and imaginary mass does not effect SR means that I don't have to change literal anything on this equation for C²  as the Speed of Light in time-space as Einstein's Aether Medium. Good would have been annoying anyways.

Edited December 5, 2017 by Vmedvil

[Vmedvil]

Which I noticed another error upon a transform missing division sign, when subbing Friedmann equation. 

∇'(x,y,z,t,ω_s,ω_p,M,I,k,φ,S,X,Z,u) = ((ħω_s)((|(Log_{(DgDaDψDφ-W)}(((2ħGC²))R_s - (1/4)F^a_μvF^aμv + i(ψ-bar)γ^μD_μψⁱ +(ψ-bar)ⁱ_LV_ijφψ^j_r + (a_ji) - V(φ)/-D_μ²)|)-e^2S(r,t)/h)) - ((E_rest/C²)ω_s(G_uv - R_uv/-g_uv)^1/2 + (S/ (((3G(E_rest/C²))/2C²R_s³)(R_pV_p) + (GI_s/C²R_s³)((3R_p/R_s²)(ω_p R_p) -ω_p ))))R_s²/2))) / (ħ²/2(E_rest/C²))))^1/2(((1-(((2(E_rest/C²)G / R_s) - (I_sω_s(G_uv - R_uv/-g_uv)^1/2 + (S/(((3G(E_rest/C²))/2C²R_s³)(R_pV_p) + (GI_s/C²R_s³)((3R_p/R_s²)(ω_p R_p) -ω_p )))))/2(E_rest/C²))+ (((8πG/3)((g/(2π)³)∫(((E_relativistic² - E_rest² / C²) + ((A_r(X) + (E_{Nucleon binding SNF} ε₀ μ₀ /m_u) - A_r(X^Z+)/Z) / m_u)²)^(1/2)(1/e^{((ERelativistic  - μchemical)/TMatter)}±1)(ħω_s  + ħω_s) - ((k_sC²)/ R_s²) + (G_uv - R_uv/-g_uv)^1/2(ΔKiloparsec)))²/(C²)))^1/2)

I did this quickly so if this happens a third time, I will reconstruct the entire equation to make sure they match, three strikes and I destroy and reconstruct, luckily I remember every change.

Edited December 5, 2017 by Vmedvil

[Mordred]

Lol yeah working with equations that complex gets incredibly annoying on reductions. Glad to see your sheer diligence. Very few are willing to go the mile.