Wormhole Metric...... How is this screwed up.

[Vmedvil]

46 minutes ago, Mordred said:

Lol yeah working with equations that complex gets incredibly annoying on reductions. Glad to see your sheer diligence. Very few are willing to go the mile.

Well, I am in a relatively good mood because of PCCO + graphine superconductor analysis says 100x Iron based, which has nothing to do with this but is wonderful for another project.

Edited December 5, 2017 by Vmedvil

[Mordred]

lol good to hear on the other thread earlier today you encountered an issue with neutrino mixing and Higgs.

So I dug up a lecture on how Higgs and neutrinos apply to the Langevian and the gauge corrections

https://www.google.ca/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.nikhef.nl/~ivov/HiggsLectureNote.pdf&ved=0ahUKEwjBhNmMlvLXAhVL2oMKHfS3ATAQFggdMAA&usg=AOvVaw26NjS53quxIisxyXHNFjAi

I might also suggest looking through Pati-Salam subgroups of the SM model under SO(10) you will find the detail handy to this modelling.

edit forgot to add you will note the relationships to an earlier Langevian equation I posted on this thread much earlier lol.

Edited December 5, 2017 by Mordred

[Vmedvil]

17 minutes ago, Mordred said:

lol good to hear on the other thread earlier today you encountered an issue with neutrino mixing and Higgs.

So I dug up a lecture on how Higgs and neutrinos apply to the Langevian and the gauge corrections

https://www.google.ca/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.nikhef.nl/~ivov/HiggsLectureNote.pdf&ved=0ahUKEwjBhNmMlvLXAhVL2oMKHfS3ATAQFggdMAA&usg=AOvVaw26NjS53quxIisxyXHNFjAi

I might also suggest looking through Pati-Salam subgroups of the SM model under SO(10)

Oh, I see where this goes now the symmetry break.

Edited December 5, 2017 by Vmedvil

[Mordred]

Yeah the Pati-Salam will teach you the right hand rule to your symmetry groups left/right chirality and helicity relations under your SM gauge groups

Edited December 5, 2017 by Mordred

[Vmedvil]

1 minute ago, Mordred said:

Yeah the Pati-Salam will teach you the right hand rule to your symmetry groups left/right chirality and helicity relations.

Ya, I thought this fit in a odd way but it doesn't.

[Mordred]

Correct this is the related to the double cover of the SO(n) orthogonal groups. Which includes the Poicare group.

Here is the algebra of the Poincare group.

https://www.google.ca/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www2.ph.ed.ac.uk/~s0948358/mysite/Poincare%20Chapters%201%262.pdf&ved=0ahUKEwjy64ruoPLXAhWh4IMKHX4xBTYQFggdMAA&usg=AOvVaw10So-VAuHjnj3N1E9JZQSW

Edited December 5, 2017 by Mordred

[Vmedvil]

Add Left and Right Handed Neutrinos for now but Right handed may get removed later.

V(φ) = (μ²((φ-sword)φ) + λ((φ-sword)φ)²)

D_μ  = (δ_{μ + ig(1/2)}τW_μ + ig'(1/2)YB_μ)

Transform.

∇'(x,y,z,t,ω_s,ω_p,M,I,k,φ,S,X,Z,μ,Y) = ((ħω_s)((|(Log_{(DgDaDψDφ-W)}(((2ħGC²))R_s - (1/4)F^a_μvF^aμv + i(ψ-bar)γ^μ(δ_{μ + ig(1/2)}τW_μ + ig'(1/2)YB_μ)ψⁱ +(ψ-bar)ⁱ_LV_ijφψ^j_r + (a_ji) - (μ²((φ-sword)φ) + λ((φ-sword)φ)²)/-(δ_{μ + ig(1/2)}τW_μ + ig'(1/2)YB_μ)²)|)-e^2S(r,t)/h)) - ((E_rest/C²)ω_s(G_uv - R_uv/-g_uv)^1/2 + (S/ (((3G(E_rest/C²))/2C²R_s³)(R_pV_p) + (GI_s/C²R_s³)((3R_p/R_s²)(ω_p R_p) -ω_p ))))R_s²/2))) / (ħ²/2(E_rest/C²))))^1/2(((1-(((2(E_rest/C²)G / R_s) - (I_sω_s(G_uv - R_uv/-g_uv)^1/2 + (S/(((3G(E_rest/C²))/2C²R_s³)(R_pV_p) + (GI_s/C²R_s³)((3R_p/R_s²)(ω_p R_p) -ω_p )))))/2(E_rest/C²))+ (((8πG/3)((g/(2π)³)∫(((E_relativistic² - E_rest² / C²) + ((A_r(X) + (E_{Nucleon binding SNF} ε₀ μ₀ /m_u) - A_r(X^Z+)/Z) / m_u)²)^(1/2)(1/e^{((ERelativistic  - μchemical)/TMatter)}±1)(ħω_s  + ħω_s) - ((k_sC²)/ R_s²) + (G_uv - R_uv/-g_uv)^1/2(ΔKiloparsec)))²/(C²)))^1/2)

So, I will add it like this on Flavour Charge saying all are possible states.

Y = 1 Left handed Neutrino

Y = 0 Right handed Neutrino without SNF1 ,E_{Nucleon binding SNF}  = 0 , Dark Matter Type I

Y = -1 WIMP with SNF1 ,E_{Nucleon binding SNF}  > 0  , Dark Matter Type II

But, -1 and 0 cannot both be true for "Real Universe" Depends on the Ghost Operator's State (δ_μ) in "Real Universe" does it go Sterile or Anti-ghost.

I)

II)

Edited December 5, 2017 by Vmedvil

[Vmedvil]

Also because of this one part is getting reverted back to Hamiltonian, that transform is no longer valid with this new addition. 

ħω_s  = Ĥ

∇'(x,y,z,t,ω_s,ω_p,M,I,k,φ,S,X,Z,μ,Y) = (Ĥ_s((|(Log_{(DgDaDψDφ-W)}(((2ħGC²))R_s - (1/4)F^a_μvF^aμv + i(ψ-bar)γ^μ(δ_{μ + ig(1/2)}τW_μ + ig'(1/2)YB_μ)ψⁱ +(ψ-bar)ⁱ_LV_ijφψ^j_r + (a_ji) - (μ²((φ-sword)φ) + λ((φ-sword)φ)²)/-(δ_{μ + ig(1/2)}τW_μ + ig'(1/2)YB_μ)²)|)-e^2S(r,t)/h)) - ((E_rest/C²)ω_s(G_uv - R_uv/-g_uv)^1/2 + (S/ (((3G(E_rest/C²))/2C²R_s³)(R_pV_p) + (GI_s/C²R_s³)((3R_p/R_s²)(ω_p R_p) -ω_p ))))R_s²/2))) / (ħ²/2(E_rest/C²))))^1/2(((1-(((2(E_rest/C²)G / R_s) - (I_sω_s(G_uv - R_uv/-g_uv)^1/2 + (S/(((3G(E_rest/C²))/2C²R_s³)(R_pV_p) + (GI_s/C²R_s³)((3R_p/R_s²)(ω_p R_p) -ω_p )))))/2(E_rest/C²))+ (((8πG/3)((g/(2π)³)∫(((E_relativistic² - E_rest² / C²) + ((A_r(X) + (E_{Nucleon binding SNF} ε₀ μ₀ /m_u) - A_r(X^Z+)/Z) / m_u)²)^(1/2)(1/e^{((ERelativistic  - μchemical)/TMatter)}±1)(ħω_s  + ħω_s) - ((k_sC²)/ R_s²) + (G_uv - R_uv/-g_uv)^1/2(ΔKiloparsec)))²/(C²)))^1/2)

Edited December 5, 2017 by Vmedvil

[Vmedvil]

I think it has fully absorbed the standard model at this point.

and everything but molecules in chemistry.

Along with GR + SR

Four Momentum SR.

QM still needs to be altered to get molecules and  such.

I think this is what is needed.

I did notice this it has to include Antimatter Z^±

^Transform.

∇'(x,y,z,t,ω_s,ω_p,M,I,k,φ,S,X,Z,μ,Y) = (Ĥ_s((|(Log_{(DgDaDψDφ-W)}(((2ħGC²))R_s - (1/4)F^a_μvF^aμv + i(ψ-bar)γ^μ(δ_{μ + ig(1/2)}τW_μ + ig'(1/2)YB_μ)ψⁱ +(ψ-bar)ⁱ_LV_ijφψ^j_r + (a_ji) - (μ²((φ-sword)φ) + λ((φ-sword)φ)²)/-(δ_{μ + ig(1/2)}τW_μ + ig'(1/2)YB_μ)²)|)-e^2S(r,t)/h)) - ((E_rest/C²)ω_s(G_uv - R_uv/-g_uv)^1/2 + (S/ (((3G(E_rest/C²))/2C²R_s³)(R_pV_p) + (GI_s/C²R_s³)((3R_p/R_s²)(ω_p R_p) -ω_p ))))R_s²/2))) / (ħ²/2(E_rest/C²))))^1/2(((1-(((2(E_rest/C²)G / R_s) - (I_sω_s(G_uv - R_uv/-g_uv)^1/2 + (S/(((3G(E_rest/C²))/2C²R_s³)(R_pV_p) + (GI_s/C²R_s³)((3R_p/R_s²)(ω_p R_p) -ω_p )))))/2(E_rest/C²))+ (((8πG/3)((g/(2π)³)∫(((E_relativistic² - E_rest² / C²) + ((A_r(X) + (E_{Nucleon binding SNF} ε₀ μ₀ /m_u) - A_r(X^Z±)/Z) / m_u)²)^(1/2)(1/e^{((ERelativistic  - μchemical)/TMatter)}±1)(ħω_s  + ħω_s) - ((k_sC²)/ R_s²) + (G_uv - R_uv/-g_uv)^1/2(ΔKiloparsec)))²/(C²)))^1/2)

Edited December 6, 2017 by Vmedvil

[Vmedvil]

Which Coriolis coupling is not general enough only diatomic molecules, but the constant version is and also I think I know why Quantum entanglement happens now same reason as why molecules bind, synced rotation/Angular velocity and vibration states equal opposite perfectly.

Edited December 6, 2017 by Vmedvil

[Vmedvil]

Alright not miss any QM objects electron configuration and quantum numbers can be explained by (X,Z) Dimensions, so that is the right Hamiltonian, Einstein's view of QM was retarded, which is why his equation for quanta is invalid. 

Edited December 6, 2017 by Vmedvil

[Mordred]

39 minutes ago, Vmedvil said:

Which Coriolis coupling is not general enough only diatomic molecules, but the constant version is and also I think I know why Quantum entanglement happens now same reason as why molecules bind, synced rotation/Angular velocity and vibration states equal opposite perfectly.

Not quite, the entanglement process involves the conservation laws of the Eightfold Way

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eightfold_Way_(physics)

see the conserved quantities on this page

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symmetry_(physics)#Conservation_laws_and_symmetry

These will involve the Gell Mann matrix'es. Key words the Baryon Octet, Baryon Decouplet the Meson Nonet.

 

 

[Vmedvil]

3 minutes ago, Mordred said:

Not quite, the entanglement process involves the conservation laws of the Eightfold Way

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eightfold_Way_(physics)

see the conserved quantities on this page

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symmetry_(physics)#Conservation_laws_and_symmetry

These will involve the Gell Mann matrix'es. Key words the Baryon Octet, Baryon Decouplet the Meson Nonet.

 

 

So, that pulls through the ghost operator then?

[Mordred]

http://arxiv.org/abs/0810.3328

http://arxiv.org/abs/0908.1395

the first two is particle physics (basics lol, the second link is detailing under Relativity

this is a good overview of how it applies to GUT theory

http://arxiv.org/pdf/0904.1556.pdf

Personally though I recommend getting Griffith's textbook "Introductory to Particle physics"

 

[Vmedvil]

In any case, proof of (X,Z) dimensions holding all information of Quantum Numbers.

1		H		1s1
2		He		1s2 = [He]
3		Li		[He] 2s1
4		Be		[He] 2s2
5		B		[He] 2s2 2p1
6		C		[He] 2s2 2p2
7		N		[He] 2s2 2p3
8		O		[He] 2s2 2p4
9		F		[He] 2s2 2p5
10		Ne		[He] 2s2 2p6 = [Ne]
11		Na		[Ne] 3s1
12		Mg		[Ne] 3s2
13		Al		[Ne] 3s2 3p1
14		Si		[Ne] 3s2 3p2
15		P		[Ne] 3s2 3p3
16		S		[Ne] 3s2 3p4
17		Cl		[Ne] 3s2 3p5
18		Ar		[Ne] 3s2 3p6 = [Ar]
19		K		[Ar] 4s1
20		Ca		[Ar] 4s2
21		Sc		[Ar] 4s2 3d1
22		Ti		[Ar] 4s2 3d2
23		V		[Ar] 4s2 3d3
24		Cr		[Ar] 4s1 3d5
25		Mn		[Ar] 4s2 3d5
26		Fe		[Ar] 4s2 3d6
27		Co		[Ar] 4s2 3d7
28		Ni		[Ar] 4s2 3d8
29		Cu		[Ar] 4s1 3d10
30		Zn		[Ar] 4s2 3d10
31		Ga		[Ar] 4s2 3d10 4p1
32		Ge		[Ar] 4s2 3d10 4p2
33		As		[Ar] 4s2 3d10 4p3
34		Se		[Ar] 4s2 3d10 4p4
35		Br		[Ar] 4s2 3d10 4p5
36		Kr		[Ar] 4s2 3d10 4p6 = [Kr]

Edited December 6, 2017 by Vmedvil

[Mordred]

7 minutes ago, Vmedvil said:

So, that pulls through the ghost operator then?

yes The last link By Beaz is informative to the group symmetry involvement

 

Edited December 6, 2017 by Mordred

[Vmedvil]

2 minutes ago, Mordred said:

yes

 

See thats what I thought, I once did a mass gap solution me and the Ghost operator are like best friends.

That is screwed up so Hyercharge/flavour  mediates QE?

Edited December 6, 2017 by Vmedvil

[Mordred]

The Ghost operator is more so for the atom but it does relate to the symmetries involved in the Beaz link (last link above)

http://www-thphys.physics.ox.ac.uk/people/JamesBinney/qb.pdf

[Vmedvil]

Ya, I am going to have to make a Lagrangian for a DM + QE ghost, I see where this pulls through.

[Mordred]

Here is the Ghost operator application for SU(3) which applies for the Gell-Mann matrixes

https://arxiv.org/ftp/hep-th/papers/0701/0701194.pdf

You will find a lot of this is already done if you dig deep enough

[Vmedvil]

5 minutes ago, Mordred said:

Here is the Ghost operator application for SU(3) which applies for the Gell-Mann matrixes

https://arxiv.org/ftp/hep-th/papers/0701/0701194.pdf

You will find a lot of this is already done if you dig deep enough

ya, I need DM Ghost Lagrangian with QE, I have it solved for δ_μ

Edited December 6, 2017 by Vmedvil

[Mordred]

Well the SU(3) group also details the Higgs and neutrino mixings so it can also apply

[Vmedvil]

3 minutes ago, Mordred said:

Well the SU(3) group also details the Higgs and neutrino mixings so it can also apply

You know what screw the DM part that can be detailed on Hypercharge, just need a QE ghost Lagrangian. 

[Mordred]

There is an easy way to keep track of all this.

the SM groups are

[math](SU(3)\otimes SU(2)\ otimes U(1)[/math] the SU(2) uses the Paui matrixes while the SU(3) uses the Gell-Mann matrixes

1 minute ago, Vmedvil said:

You know what screw the DM part that can be detailed on Hypercharge, just need a QE ghost Lagrangian. 

like this one?

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1302.5943v2

[Vmedvil]

4 minutes ago, Mordred said:

There is an easy way to keep track of all this.

the SM groups are

(SU(3)⊗SU(2) otimesU(1) the SU(2) uses the Paui matrixes while the SU(3) uses the Gell-Mann matrixes

like this one?

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1302.5943v2

Need it to be solved for L.