jamesmatheson Posted November 24, 2017 Posted November 24, 2017 So now im in this debate if a 1 to 1ratio gearhead can give more strength and obviously it can how does this affect science? In cells it is believed that the center gives the most strength when if we understood how strength is being sent we could understand how to make stronger cells using cells of lesser strength on the outside and not in the center then the nucleus could be any cell It would help a lot of fields but I am still in a debate if a 1 to 1 ratio can give strength I had 2 companies agree one said You could accomplish that by using different motor bodies another company said In order to get the same speed at different torque based on the same nominal voltage, it would be better to use same gearbox but different motor to do this job I bought these 2 motors and sent them to America to have someone put together Planetary gearhead GPX 22 HP Ø22 mm 2.4 nm Planetary gearhead GPX 26 LN Ø26 mm, 1.8nm Both have this: Reduction26 : 1 Absolute reduction4950/190 Mass inertia1.31 gcm² I paid so much a sales rep came to me and when I told him I am trying to make a 1 to 1 ratio gear head increase torque he said he would have nothing to do with me and he stopped all our conversations heres a little video I made https://photos.app.goo.gl/jLzL5zhuoHedATEX2 A 1 to 1 ratio gear head increasing torque means a lot I hope someone people can help me speak to the international community about this at this moment ALL the students are being told that a 1 to 1 ratio gear head cannot increase torque and obviously that is wrong and it affects all the science, medical, mechanical , turbines, astronomy, and more fields We cant even have a fully understanding of cells or the stars or gravity or anything scientific if we keep saying that an object of lesser strength cannot move an object of greater strength at the same speed ( I know it can move faster also but im still having to argue that it can move at the same speed) I hope someone will help me with speaking to the intentionally community about this project (its inertia that's moving these objects not the object itself)
Endy0816 Posted November 24, 2017 Posted November 24, 2017 Can you show the math for why you think this?
mistermack Posted December 1, 2017 Posted December 1, 2017 It sounds like a perpetual motion machine, producing additional energy from nothing.
Roamer Posted December 1, 2017 Posted December 1, 2017 On 24-11-2017 at 7:55 PM, jamesmatheson said: how does this affect science? It would give some new(and easier) formulas to write.(if it checks out)
Lord Antares Posted December 1, 2017 Posted December 1, 2017 On 11/24/2017 at 7:55 PM, jamesmatheson said: at this moment ALL the students are being told that a 1 to 1 ratio gear head cannot increase torque and obviously that is wrong Why is wrong? If it is so obviously wrong, you can surely demonstrate how it can increase torque. And what does it mean for a gear to ''hold strength''? I watched your video what you're saying isn't really coherent. You're all over the place.
koti Posted December 31, 2017 Posted December 31, 2017 (edited) Why is this in physics. How about we start off the new year without this incoherent babble. Or is the conservation of energy not going to be with us in 2018? Edited December 31, 2017 by koti
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now