Jump to content

Dark energy and energy conservation (split from Conservation of energy/mass)


Recommended Posts

Posted

Well, I will say the other side of this Energy is conserved in Dark Energy because Curvature is balanced out by Radius increase in the Friedmann equation for Hubble constant or Dark Energy which causes the acceleration not increase in energy assuming energy conservation is absolute for the universe along with Energy is neither created or destroyed it just changes form and in that case the Universe will always have the same amount of Energy-Mass never changing in value just form. Otherwise Thermodynamics needs to be rewritten, unless the energy is being received from another universe in which case that would be fine with those laws under 1 and 2 as systems can transfer heat which is a type of Energy-mass between each-other. 

Posted (edited)

So explain why DE doesn't follow the normal thermodynamic rules on regards to change in volume as per the FRW metric equations of state for an adiabatic and isentropic fluid which equates to no net inflow or outflow of energy without invoking alternative universe?

I suggest reading the preposterous universe link by Sean Caroll before replying. See post above by Strange.

Not to say there isn't viable solutions, the one I'm thinking of doesn't require alternative universes.  Simply curious if you happen to have some viable solution in mind. Considering the conservation laws in regards to the universe is still an open question. See post by Swansont after reading the preposterous universe link.

Edit actually considering another article once posted by Strange make that two.

Edited by Mordred
Posted
  On 12/10/2017 at 3:58 AM, Mordred said:

So explain why DE doesn't follow the normal thermodynamic rules on regards to change in volume as per the FRW metric equations of state for an adiabatic and isentropic fluid which equates to no net inflow or outflow of energy without invoking alternative universe?

I suggest reading the preposterous universe link by Sean Caroll before replying. See post above by Strange.

Not to say there isn't viable solutions, the one I'm thinking of doesn't require alternative universes.  Simply curious if you happen to have some viable solution in mind. Considering the conservation laws in regards to the universe is still an open question. See post by Swansont after reading the preposterous universe link.

Edit actually considering another article once posted by Strange make that two.

Expand  

Well, I did but it got split.

Posted (edited)

Well, all I can say is there are other universes, that is the only reason it would be different if the conservation laws are correct. Just like our planet is not special nor our star or galaxy nor is our universe.

 

This Term, is why doesn't obey PV = nRT

Untitled.thumb.png.4a0c7e07327465bb73265642e95b033b.png

Curvature / acceleration

Edited by Vmedvil
Posted (edited)
  On 12/12/2017 at 4:45 PM, swansont said:
!

Moderator Note

Speculations it is, then.

 
Expand  

If that is speculations then what is the universe accelerating expanding into, mainstream accepts that, what would that be called exactly? You know what I will never use that term, Gravitation is leaking into "whatever the universe accelerating expanding into".

Edited by Vmedvil
Posted
  On 12/12/2017 at 4:32 PM, Vmedvil said:

Well, all I can say is there are other universes

Expand  

Got any evidence for that?

  On 12/12/2017 at 4:51 PM, Vmedvil said:

what is the universe accelerating expanding into

Expand  

It is not expanding into anything. It is either infinite or finite and unbounded. So there is not "outside" for it to expand into.

Given the advanced stuff you post about, you have some absolutely massive gaps in your knowledge.

  On 12/12/2017 at 4:51 PM, Vmedvil said:

Gravitation is leaking into "whatever the universe accelerating expanding into"

Expand  

So not leaking at all, then.

Posted (edited)
  On 12/12/2017 at 5:23 PM, Strange said:

Got any evidence for that?

It is not expanding into anything. It is either infinite or finite and unbounded. So there is not "outside" for it to expand into.

Given the advanced stuff you post about, you have some absolutely massive gaps in your knowledge.

So not leaking at all, then.

Expand  

These were sarcasm questions, just like the ones in that other thread were sarcasm answers, like "Oh really, it is solid then" Where I will keep doing this to you until you read why that is impossible what you said.

"It is not expanding into anything. It is either infinite or finite and unbounded. So there is not "outside" for it to expand into."

Edited by Vmedvil
Posted
  On 12/12/2017 at 9:01 PM, Vmedvil said:

These were sarcasm questions, just like the ones in that other thread were sarcasm answers, like "Oh really, it is solid then" Where I will keep doing this to you until you read why that is impossible what you said.

"It is not expanding into anything. It is either infinite or finite and unbounded. So there is not "outside" for it to expand into."

Expand  

Why is it sarcasm to ask for evidence of a claim? It is the basis of science.

Why is it sarcasm to point out that the universe is not expanding into anything?

But don't take my word for it: "The short answer is that this is a nonsense question, the Universe isn’t expanding into anything, it’s just expanding."
https://www.universetoday.com/1455/podcast-what-is-the-universe-expanding-into/

Or, for more detail: http://curious.astro.cornell.edu/about-us/104-the-universe/cosmology-and-the-big-bang/expansion-of-the-universe/623-what-is-the-universe-expanding-into-intermediate

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.