Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I appologise if this is posted in the wrong section. I wasn't sure exactly where to post it.

 

The Big Bang seems to be described as a black hole in reverse. Or at least it has in some of the books I've read.

 

If this is the case, how come other black holes just fade away or evaporate? How come we havn't detected a similar explosion like that which supposedly created our Universe?

 

Or am I missing a vital point?

Posted

If you read into the big crunch theory the big bang could have been the result of all matter and energy in the universe condensing into one tiny point. Basically a universal blackhole.

 

Its possible that when a black hole reaches a certain mass it can't contain itself anymore and "exploads".

 

The reason we havent seen this in stellar or galactic black holes is because they lack the mass to trigger an explosion.

 

 

Just a thought...

Posted

It reminds me of something I've thought about before. I pictured it as like a sqeezebox or accordian. Though would I be right to assume that this would imply a repeating contraction and expansion sequence that would give us a closed universe?

Posted

The Big Bang as a Black Hole is its debunking.

After all how can a universal black hole expand?

Its gravity would prevent it!!!

Posted

This is the problem dad. Not just might not have been;

couldn't have been. But how is that?

There are no black holes. There is a gravity limit.

There are no black holes but there is an extreme of gravity.

I say that matter didn't begin as a singularity. that the orginal buildup

of energy created matter at a finite density.

 

If there is no gravity then the early universe violates

Hawkings No Boundary Proposal. Without gravity the

universal cosmology has to be an open one with boundaries.

or space and then no-space

 

So Hawking can't have it both ways: To start without gravity

and still have his closed universe.

Posted
or the equations don't work right @ big bang

 

That's what Hawking has to say but he did not go far enough:

GR predicts its own downfall by predicting singlarities.

 

In other words there are infinities.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.