Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Diarrhoea (I had to copy and paste that from t'Internet) is about the only one that causes a problem for me. Luckily, I don't have to write it very often.

Posted
1 minute ago, Strange said:

Diarrhoea (I had to copy and paste that from t'Internet) is about the only one that causes a problem for me. Luckily, I don't have to write it very often.

Yeah, that's a pain.

Just now, John Cuthber said:

In terms of "most often misspelled", I think it's "the".

What are the alternatives?

Posted
On 1/13/2018 at 4:26 AM, Strange said:

Diarrhoea (I had to copy and paste that from t'Internet) is about the only one that causes a problem for me. Luckily, I don't have to write it very often.

On 1/13/2018 at 4:28 AM, StringJunky said:

Yeah, that's a pain.

On 1/13/2018 at 4:58 AM, MigL said:

What's a pain ?
The diarrhea or the spelling ?

On 1/13/2018 at 5:03 AM, StringJunky said:

See, even you can't spell it. :)  (I know, you do it the American way)

The British way looks more painfully spelled, which seems unnecessarily embarrassing. 

 

Posted
1 minute ago, Phi for All said:

The British way looks more painfully spelled, which seems unnecessarily embarrassing. 

 

I think most people would spell it, "the runs".

Posted
27 minutes ago, Strange said:

I think most people would spell it, "the runs".

Not "the trots"? That's what I call it, and I've ALWAYS used a posh accent to juxtapose the vulgarity of the subject. "The runs" sounds more American to me. 

 

 

Many years ago, computer spellcheck cured me of a weird tendency to misspell "guard". Somehow my fingers learned to type it as gaurd, and eventually that looked right to me. I remember being embarrassingly adamant about how WRONG spellcheck was.

Posted
8 hours ago, Phi for All said:

Not "the trots"?

I don't think I have ever heard that used. The squits is another popular alternative.

8 hours ago, Phi for All said:

Many years ago, computer spellcheck cured me of a weird tendency to misspell "guard".

I seem to remember being surprised when spellcheck corrected "separately" for me, so presumably I had been misspelling it as "seperately" for years.

Posted
2 hours ago, iNow said:

maintenance 

Weird, this is one of the easiest words to spell for me in English. I struggle with words with double l’s and double r’s in them for some reason but believe me, English is a joy to spell, I struggle far more with Polish, try: Dżdżownica (earthworm), Chrząszcz (beetle), rzeczywiście (really) or essencially any other word - its a nightmare.

Posted
1 hour ago, koti said:

I struggle far more with Polish, try: Dżdżownica (earthworm), Chrząszcz (beetle), rzeczywiście (really)

Vowels are like breaths of air, so you struggle with suffocation when there are too few. I'd be gasping in a Polish spelling bee.

1 hour ago, koti said:

or essencially any other word - its a nightmare.

Essentially. 

Posted (edited)

Neighbour - which is often spelt missing the "u" - always had me struggling. I use "it's" when I'm informed it's supposed to have no apostrophe - ("it's apostrophe being both wrong and superfluous"). I dig my heels in and use it anyway, in line with apostrophe as indicator of belonging to; perhaps common usage - and I'm not the only one - will end up making it correct.

Edited by Ken Fabian
Posted
13 minutes ago, Ken Fabian said:

I dig my heels in and use it anyway, in line with apostrophe as indicator of belonging to; perhaps common usage - and I'm not the only one - will end up making it correct.

No (other) possessive pronouns have an apostrophe. So good luck with that!

Posted (edited)

 

37 minutes ago, Strange said:

No (other) possessive pronouns have an apostrophe. So good luck with that!

 

Why the exception for pronouns? Anyway, usage is the final arbiter.

 

Edited by Ken Fabian
Posted
16 minutes ago, Ken Fabian said:

Why the exception for pronouns?

Interesting question. Because of the complex history of pronouns, I guess. Most didn't start off with an -s ending (and most still don't have one: mine, your, their, etc.). So I think "its" was a later invention and modelled on "his". 

There was a period when both -n and -s were being used as the possessive ending (as in mine, thine and non-standard yourn). And sometimes in combination (hisn).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.