TED888 Posted January 13, 2018 Posted January 13, 2018 (edited) Expansion could be the result of GWs from beyond the known universe meaning dark matter & dark energy as well as particle charge would have their own respective superluminal velocities. A GW will propagate faster if it is broader, so because GWs propagate at the speed of light (demonstrated by LIGO in 2017) there could be superluminal GWs if adjacent cosmoses are in a later state of expansion than ours is, just as the current speed of light is faster than it was 13.8 billion years ago.Meaning that, & this is important, the fastest GWs have traveled the farthest to get here and have lost the most strength because they've journeyed the farthest. Dark matter & dark energy don't have to be stronger than our gravity to cause expansion, one just has to be stronger than the other. Same with QE, which only effects the subatomic world because of how weak those GWs are. From this picture we can derive equations in order to define the effects that this extra-cosmic gravitation will have on our cosmos: C = (Length of Left Strong GWs( c)ly)/(600billionly ( c)) Length of GWs = length of the left strong GWs/.05 ly Length of right strong GWs = (length of GWs x .27) - 600billionly Length of left weak GWs = length of GWs x .27 ly length of right weak GWs = length of GWs x .68 Velocity of left strong gravitational waves = ((length of left strong GWs)C)/(600billionlyC) Velocity of right strong gravitational waves = ((length of right strong GWs)C)/(600billionlyC); (velocity of left strong GWs + velocity of right strong GWs)/2 = Current Rate of Expansion Velocity of right weak gravitational waves = ((length of right weak GWs)C)/(600billionlyC) = Velocity of positive Particle Charge Velocity of left weak gravitational waves = ((length of left weak GWs)C)/(600billionlyC) = Velocity of negative Particle Charge; (Velocity of positive PC + Velocity of negative PC)/2 = The Speed of Quantum Entanglement So, Velocity of left strong GWs = 2.6023649x10^30 m/s Velocity of right strong gravitational waves = 5.2047298 x 10^30 m/s Velocity of right weak gravitational waves = 1.405277 x 10^31 m/s Velocity of left weak gravitational waves = 3.5392163 x 10^31 m/s Current Rate of Expansion = 3.9035474 x 10^30 m/s The Speed of Quantum Entanglement = 6.6389135 x 10^31 m/s Will tell us the moment of the big crunch when accounting for the varying velocities of QE & expansion.Some of the missing baryonic matter from the missing Baryon problem might still be missing:"The initial measurements still do not account for all the ordinary matter, and some believe the remaining portion could be made up by exotic unobserved objects such as black holes or dark stars. Cosmologists are also still yet to discover the nature of dark matter, which makes up even more of the universe." This could be wayward extra-cosmic galaxies from the source of the left strong GWs traveling into our cosmic domain, or at least a gravitational domino effect in the gravitational chain-link of galaxies tugging us (modern dark flow), initiating the first phase of the big crunch. In either case, according to my model the big crunch will be complete when our "universe" expands to be the same size as the source of the left strong GWs, which we've already calculated to be in 1.56141895 x 10^42 years when determining the length of the left strong GWs. Plug that into length of GWs times velocity of GWs ly in meters/(1.56141895 x 10^42 + 13.8 billion years in seconds & the speed of light in the superverse is 3.1225079 x 10^41 m/s, divide by the speed of light to find your lorentz transformation which can be used to calculate the size in which atomic structures begin to form in the superverse according to my model & you'll get 1.0415565 x 10^43 meters, or 1.1008947 x 10^27 light years. Now that's a big atom! Let's see the size of an atom in a microverse, (1 x 10^-15)/(1.04155652 x 10^33) gives you 9.6010152 x 10^-49 meters, which is 1.6664904 x 10^13 times smaller than a planck length. BTW, the speed of light in a microverse is equal to the speed of light in a superverse. You can't use the lorentz transformation to just divide for units that measure velocity in the same way I just for units that measure size, this is because of the effects of time dilation. A particle of energy is like a universe of matter, with a relatively equivalent amount of mass in adjusted scale. Fall anywhere in space, no matter how seemingly void, and you will land on matter if you're small enough:empty space ought not be really empty. We have two good reasons to think so: first, electromagnetic signals behave undoubtedly as waves; since they propagate even through intergalactic space, there must be some thing there (everywhere), in which they do wave. Second, quantum theory predicts that vacuum has physical effects, such as the Casimir effect, which is now experimentally confirmed [1].Gerard t'Hooft, another proponent of ether theory:"Einstein had difficulties with the relativistic invariance of quantum mechanics (“does the spooky information transmitted by these particles go faster than light?”). These, however, are now seen as technical difficulties that have been resolved. It may be consid- ered part of Copenhagen’s Doctrine, that the transmission of information over a distance can only take place, if we can identify operators A at space-time point x1 and operators B at space-time point x2 that do not commute: [A, B] 6= 0 . We now understand that, in elementary particle theory, all space-like separated observables mutually commute, which precludes any signalling faster than light. It is a built-in feature of the Standard Model, to which it actually owes much of its success. So, with the technical difficulties out of the way, we are left with the more essential Einsteinian objections against the Copenhagen doctrine for quantum mechanics: it is a probabilistic theory that does not tell us what actually is going on. It is sometimes even suggested that we have to put our “classical” sense of logic on hold. Others deny that: “Keep remembering what you should never ask, while reshaping your sense of logic, and everything will be fine.” According to the present author, the Einstein-Bohr debate is not over. A theory must be found that does not force us to redefine any aspect of classical, logical reasoning. What Einstein and Bohr did seem to agree about is the importance of the role of an observer. Indeed, this was the important lesson learned in the 20th century: if something cannot be observed, it may not be a well-defined concept – it may even not exist at all. We have to limit ourselves to observable features of a theory. It is an important ingredient of our present work that we propose to part from this doctrine, at least to some extent: Things that are not directly observable may still exist and as such play a decisive role in the observable properties of an object. They may also help us to construct realistic models of the world. Indeed, there are big problems with the dictum that everything we talk about must be observable. While observing microscopic objects, an observer may disturb them, even in a classical theory; moreover, in gravity theories, observers may carry gravitational fields that disturb the system they are looking at, so we cannot afford to make an observer infinitely heavy (carrying large bags full of “data”, whose sheer weight gravitationally disturbs the environment), but also not infinitely light (light particles do not transmit large amounts of data at all), while, if the mass of an observer would be “somewhere in between”, ." More evidence:The situation is somewhat different when we consider gravity and promote the Lorentz violating tensors to dynamical objects. For example in an aether theory, where Lorentz violation is described by a timelike four vector, the four vector can twist in such a way that local superluminal propagation can lead to energy-momentum flowing around closed paths [206]. However, even classical general relativity admits solutions with closed time like curves, so it is not clear that the situation is any worse with Lorentz violation. Furthermore, note that in models where Lorentz violation is given by coupling matter fields to a non-zero, timelike gradient of a scalar field, the scalar field also acts as a time function on the spacetime. In such a case, the spacetime must be stably causal (c.f. [272]) and there are no closed timelike curves. This property also holds in Lorentz violating models with vectors if the vector in a particular solution can be written as a non-vanishing gradient of a scalar. Finally, we mention that in fact many approaches to quantum gravity actually predict a failure of causality based on a background metric [121] as in quantum gravity the notion of a spacetime event is not necessarily well-defined [239]. A concrete realization of this possibility is provided in Bose-Einstein condensate analogs of black holes [40]. Here the low energy phonon excitations obey Lorentz invariance and microcausality [270]. However, as one approaches a certain length scale (the healing length of the condensate) the background metric description breaks down and the low energy notion of microcausality no longer holds. ----In the Bohmian view, nonlocality is even more conspicuous. The trajectory of any one particle depends on what all the other particles described by the same wave function are doing. And, critically, the wave function has no geographic limits; it might, in principle, span the entire universe. Which means that the universe is weirdly interdependent, even across vast stretches of space. ----The hole is quantum-mechanically unstable: It has no bound states. Wormhole wave functions must eventually leak to large radii. This suggests that stability considerations along these lines may place strong constraints on the nature and even the existence of spacetime foam. ----In invariant set theory, the form of the Bell Inequality whose violation would be inconsistent with realism and local causality is undefined, and the form of the inequality that it violated experimentally is not even gp-approximately close to the form needed to rule out local realism (54) [21]. A key element in demonstrating this result derives from the fact that experimenters cannot in principle shield their apparatuses from the uncontrollable ubiquitous gravitational waves that fill space-time. ----A finite non-classical framework for physical theory is described which challenges the conclusion that the Bell Inequality has been shown to have been violated experimentally, even approximately. This framework postulates the universe as a deterministic locally causal system evolving on a measure-zero fractal-like geometry IU in cosmological state space. Consistent with the assumed primacy of IU , and p-adic number theory, a non-Euclidean (and hence non-classical) metric gp is defined on cosmological state space, where p is a large but finite Pythagorean prime. Using numbertheoretic properties of spherical triangles, the inequalities violated experimentally are shown to be gp-distant from the CHSH inequality, whose violation would rule out local realism. This result fails in the singular limit p = ∞, at which gp is Euclidean. Broader implications are discussed. ----This optical pumping scenario is implicitly based on the erroneous quantum mechanical “myth” that quantum “jumps” are instantaneous. In reality transitions between atomic levels take very, very long times, about 10 million times longer than the oscillating period of the electromagnetic radiation that drives the excitation.The Microverse: A microverse is the same principle as a level 1 multiverse, matter can only arrange itself in so many different ways eventually everything assumes the same form again.This is what goes on inside the nucleus of a more complex atom:https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/81190/whats-inside-a-proton"You can't consider a proton just as three quarks (called valence quarks, because they determine the quantum numbers) because virtual quarks and antiquarks are constantly being created and annihilated via strong force. So a proton is more like a quark sea. In fact, this process gives most part of the proton's mass (the valence quarks are just the 2% of the mass).We also have this notion of black hole atoms, now suppose that these micro black holes are crucial in the formation of all atoms:https://photos.google.com/photo/AF1QipMPcSi2giMCa0Sk6I_FZ6FnBkw-ozrXDGvXUkGzThis is an atom with an atomic nucleus composed of one proton. However, most atoms have multiple protons with charge as well as a charge-neutral "neutron" which, unlike said protons, flies apart within 10 minutes when freed from the nucleus. Why? Let's break it down:https://photos.google.com/photo/AF1QipP4zX3SAJJi2xytqo-JO-7j0LwJWTCRORNm6AQFThe protons of adjacent atoms feed each other, as the micro black hole is in the process of consuming it's accretion disk; that's negative charge & all material around said nucleus, even the electrons that form, are going inward. Going outward would be positive charge, & that is when the proton has fully consumed it's accretion disk, stripped of it's mass, the matter of the accretion flows back outward in the form of Cherenkov radiation. That is positive charge, & as that proton's BH evaporates, the - proton within the nuclei of adjacent atoms grow. The cycles must be synchronized perfectly or the atoms will annihilate into light. A proton with negative charge will always become positively charged. Now, this is also an example of how quantum entanglement comes about, these atoms are causally linked by micro-gravity. It also solves the anti-matter problem; what annihilation would leave in its wake were rapidly evaporating microversal scale cosmic unit black holes in a pre-CMB, CDM state, just like a big rip. Whatever is pulled back by the expansion generated by BH shrinkage would have to be causally synchronized by gravity, just like all particle pairs.https://photos.google.com/photo/AF1QipM9S3ujWiaiVXKtQ0igaze1K5AQrTkxBVHcyJjhAs you can see here, the neutron is a glorified subatomic quark-gluon pulsar, held together by the collective gravity of the protons. The up and down quarks are just where the matter jets at the two poles of the microquasars and micro qg plasma bodies are lighting up material - two ups & 1 down or vice versa being where these matter jets ignite material:https://photos.google.com/search/_tra_/photo/AF1QipMdbMxDNyySzbrTsyjjAzQeQXrwXA1ElC2UU4tPThe idea is that the two up quarks are matter jets from a theoretical micro black hole, the third down quark is where matter enters or exits the accretion disk depending on whether the proton is in a negatively charged state (black hole is young & the matter isn't flying apart from expansion yet) or positively charged (black hole is middle aged & matter has lost most its mass & is flying apart like our galaxy will one day). These micro black holes evaporate & spawn at a rate of approximately 10 billion times per second, on average, within the general area of the protons & neutrons, right around where the atomic nucleus should be. This illustrates the scattering of virtual particles that are being compiled via electron holography.Now, let's explain the observer effect, which can also be attributed to the quantum eraser:https://photos.google.com/search/_tra_/photo/AF1QipMIv_9Wus3trT8_mIGpOLpKupbukWEZCpdfTN3Lhttps://photos.google.com/search/_tra_/photo/AF1QipNAva4lu9mV5QVn5AmcY-BTxu0bsD1kBQbHCAEzAs you can see (& as explained earlier), it's just the microgravity of the interacting particle beams.This microversal cellular automaton interpretation is much more versatile than QM, it works in explaining virtually anything in QM. For instance, let's use the quantum venn diagram paradox;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zcqZHYo7ONs&t=25shttps://photos.google.com/photo/AF1QipM4wzl7EdqP7do7L7Gwy0ajNA13uO15vomNJMpiBetween wave functions, the photons adopt new polarities as they expand through space-time. More polarizing filters=greater variety of polarities.Now let's look at the 3rd type of microverse: Quark-gluon plasma is the absolute densest state matter can take. We see it in the cores of neutron stars, discs of quasars as matter is folded upon itself by compressing spacetime (gravity/mass/dark matter) around macro black holes, & in the cosmic microwave background radiation. Any denser, & matter is just a macro black hole as there's no space between micro black holes. It's composed of micro quasars with micro black holes at their cores, barely held apart by micro expansion. Unlike vacuum radiation & the atomic world, these microverses are non-anthropic (no stellar eras) because less entropy equates to less complexity. Quark-gluon plasma is the only state of matter composed entirely of microverses that are exclusively the same as itself. Atoms & vacuum radiation will have microverses with atoms, quark-gluon plasma & vacuum radiation within them, quark-gluon plasma is only composed of microverses that are entirely filled with quark-gluon plasma.https://photos.google.com/photo/AF1QipMYvWqexE9t-KJFjSvkh0linJUkqc-vp66c0fteThe Black Hole. What is it exactly?This may imply that black holes and white holes are the same object. The Hawking radiation from an ordinary black hole is then identified with the white-hole emission. Hawking’s semi-classical argument is reproduced in a quantum mechanical AdS/CFT treatment, where a black hole in anti-de Sitter space is described by a thermal gas in a gauge theory, whose time reversal is the same as itself.The black hole is a white hole in ADS space (with negative three dimensions). Everything that's contracting in desitter space is expanding in ADS space. So black holes are perpendicular universes that have negative dimensions, so when black holes are in a near perfect vacuum the only mass they consume comes from vastly reduced black hole sizes within the microverses of photons which, as a white hole's hot dense center (where parallel universes continuously emerge) shrinks it dissolves near it's horizon, this means that the rate of expansion in the spacetime of that white hole's horizon increases & the spacetime of it's inside out DS counterpart (a black hole) shrinks. That's Hawking radiation for you.https://photos.google.com/photo/AF1QipNq9eYBOTDMvR--SsLquT6H3OR5Fgofelcfe72e This is why matter jets are so powerful around black holes, & the source of FRBs & OMG particles (relativistic protons). Key Terms Local realism Quantum observer/entanglement/eraser/venn diagram paradox anti/de sitter space/ADS/CFT duality fractal geometry/scale relativity/special relativity beyond the speed of light FRBs & the OMG particle The transplanckian problem Dark Flow/Cosmic Bruising/CMB Primer Edited January 13, 2018 by TED888
TED888 Posted January 13, 2018 Author Posted January 13, 2018 The beauty is that you can construct an iterative operation that perpetually calculates the ever-changing approximate of dimensions (3 - ~.5 = x) of the fractal we inhabit in order to locate where & when these micro black holes that produce the wormhole metric will spawn & evaporate within the microverses of microverses of the subatomic world to varying degrees of precision based on how much processing power you have available to you & through averaging out a combinatoric optimum in the varying results of that iterative dimensional analysis, you will be able to determine the pattern of every force of naturet, which is a theory of everything for all intents & purposes because it gives us the capacity to construct quantum tunneling networks & quantum entanglement gates for superluminal processing power which opens up a new world of possibilities.
John Cuthber Posted January 13, 2018 Posted January 13, 2018 57 minutes ago, TED888 said: The beauty is... missing. 1
TED888 Posted January 14, 2018 Author Posted January 14, 2018 2 hours ago, John Cuthber said: missing.
swansont Posted January 14, 2018 Posted January 14, 2018 ! Moderator Note I don't see the promised testable predictions, and you were told not to re-introduce the topic.
Recommended Posts