studiot Posted January 31, 2018 Posted January 31, 2018 (edited) I've noticed my tex stuff is overcramped when displayed, these days so I'm finding out how to make it bigger. [math]{P_{n = 3}} = \left\{ {1 - {{\left( {\frac{5}{6}} \right)}^3}} \right\} = \left\{ {1 - \left( {\frac{{125}}{{216}}} \right)} \right\} = \frac{{91}}{{216}}[/math] It comes out bigger on my TEX editor, but is cut back here Any suggestions? Edited January 31, 2018 by studiot
Sensei Posted January 31, 2018 Posted January 31, 2018 (edited) [math]\gamma[/math] [math]\gamma[/math] [math]\gamma[/math] It looks like Latex reacts to change of general font size (click Size and pick up f.e. 20) Edited January 31, 2018 by Sensei
Daedalus Posted February 4, 2018 Posted February 4, 2018 (edited) It has been a long time since I've used latex on the forum, and now I find I can't get it to work and the preview post doesn't seem to work either. I have to say that the old way of using latex and previewing the post worked a lot better, but it is most likely that I'm not familiar with how the new forum software works. What's really weird is that this post is displaying a horizontal scroll bar instead of wrapping the text... \[f(x)=\frac{x}{3}\] Edited February 4, 2018 by Daedalus 1
studiot Posted February 4, 2018 Author Posted February 4, 2018 (edited) I find I have to press the page refresh button in the browser and wait and wait and wait for superfast MathJax to load. This is another example of modern programming where presentation takes precedence over product. And thank you for bumping this thread. I have just posted an equation in Tex or whatever and I still haven't found out how to stop it being being rendered excruciatingly small. Edited February 4, 2018 by studiot
Daedalus Posted February 4, 2018 Posted February 4, 2018 (edited) No problem studiot. I figured I'd bump this thread to test some latex \( f(x)=x^2 \). I've seen the update tutorial, but it just doesn't seem to work for me \[ f(x)=x^2 \] [edit] Well, this post actually worked... However, I did have to refresh the browser like you said! This is unacceptable. The preview doesn't show the equations. So, you have to actually make a post to see if the latex works. I've been wanting to release my work on the Collatz conjecture here on the forum, but there are a lot of equations that I have to use latex to write. Since I can't preview the post anymore, I have to make several edits after posting Edited February 4, 2018 by Daedalus
Sensei Posted February 8, 2018 Posted February 8, 2018 (edited) [math]{P_{n = 3}} = \left\{ {1 - {{\left( {\frac{5}{6}} \right)}^3}} \right\} = \left\{ {1 - \left( {\frac{{125}}{{216}}} \right)} \right\} = \frac{{91}}{{216}}[/math] [math]{P_{n = 3}} = \left\{ {1 - {{\left( {\frac{5}{6}} \right)}^3}} \right\} = \left\{ {1 - \left( {\frac{{125}}{{216}}} \right)} \right\} = \frac{{91}}{{216}}[/math] [math]{P_{n = 3}} = \left\{ {1 - {{\left( {\frac{5}{6}} \right)}^3}} \right\} = \left\{ {1 - \left( {\frac{{125}}{{216}}} \right)} \right\} = \frac{{91}}{{216}}[/math] On 4.02.2018 at 6:22 PM, studiot said: I still haven't found out how to stop it being being rendered excruciatingly small. But I gave you solution in 2nd post.. Edited February 8, 2018 by Sensei
studiot Posted February 8, 2018 Author Posted February 8, 2018 1 hour ago, Sensei said: On 04/02/2018 at 5:22 PM, studiot said: I still haven't found out how to stop it being being rendered excruciatingly small. But I gave you solution in 2nd post.. Except that I had already tried that and it doesn't work. I already said that something here seems to overide the (enhanced) size setting I choose. Thanks anyway. What I don't know is how others see the Tex I am posting but for me it is so small that is muddles up fractions for instance.
Sensei Posted February 8, 2018 Posted February 8, 2018 (edited) 27 minutes ago, studiot said: Except that I had already tried that and it doesn't work. But it works on my above examples. You don't see it on your web browser? Screen-shot: 27 minutes ago, studiot said: I already said that something here seems to overide the (enhanced) size setting I choose. Thanks anyway. What I don't know is how others see the Tex I am posting but for me it is so small that is muddles up fractions for instance. What do you see from your web browser? Make screen-shot and attach in reply.. Are you on mobile or the real computer? I tried from Android mobile, and it also displays my above Latex correctly with various sizes.. What you need to do is: make Latex code, press Submit Reply. Then Edit. Then select entire line, and pick up from Size drop-down greater size. And press Save. In Firefox you can press ctrl+ and ctrl- to zoom-in and zoom-out. On 4.02.2018 at 6:22 PM, studiot said: I find I have to press the page refresh button in the browser and wait and wait and wait for superfast MathJax to load. What computer do you have? What Mbps Internet connection.. ? On Core i7 it takes maybe 1 second for Latex to show up after refresh button in the browser. Edited February 8, 2018 by Sensei
studiot Posted February 8, 2018 Author Posted February 8, 2018 2 hours ago, Sensei said: On Core i7 it takes maybe 1 second for Latex to show up after refresh button in the browser. Isn't ultra modern computing a great step forwards? I can select any size I want (although I shouldn't need to bother) in my Tex editor. When I paste it into the useless new SF editor, those instructions are stripped out. So whatever size I order I get the same sized squashed pizza on my plate (sorry symbols on my screen). But thanks very much for trying, it is not your fault.
Sensei Posted February 8, 2018 Posted February 8, 2018 13 minutes ago, studiot said: I can select any size I want (although I shouldn't need to bother) in my Tex editor. Ignore your Tex editor! 7 minutes ago, studiot said: When I paste it into the useless new SF editor, those instructions are stripped out. Because they're not understood by SFN text editor. Not a big surprise. Simply use procedure that I gave.. "What you need to do is: make Latex code, press Submit Reply. Then Edit. Then select entire line (where is Latex code), and pick up (in SFN text editor) Size drop-down greater size. And press Save.".. Then refresh button in the browser.. and you will have big Latex equation, like I showed above.
Endy0816 Posted April 5, 2018 Posted April 5, 2018 (edited) Testing... \[ f=ab \] edit: good enough. Edited April 5, 2018 by Endy0816
Orion1 Posted May 14, 2018 Posted May 14, 2018 (edited) On 2/8/2018 at 4:57 AM, studiot said: Isn't ultra modern computing a great step forwards? I can select any size I want (although I shouldn't need to bother) in my Tex editor. When I paste it into the useless new SF editor, those instructions are stripped out. So whatever size I order I get the same sized squashed pizza on my plate (sorry symbols on my screen). [math]F(x) = \int_{0}^{\infty} f(x) dx[/math] [math]\boxed{F(x) = \int_{0}^{\infty} f(x) dx}[/math] My pizza is arriving squashed also, no tip for the delivery driver! The boxed code appears to override whatever is causing it, but I do not want to box every equation, only my solutions. Edited May 14, 2018 by Orion1 source code correction... 1
studiot Posted May 14, 2018 Author Posted May 14, 2018 Thanks for this Orion, but the whole point of having a Tex editor is to avoid personal coding. (MathTypes also produces MathML.) Why keep an alligator and bite yourself?
wtf Posted June 9, 2018 Posted June 9, 2018 (edited) This working? $e^{i \pi} + 1 = 0$ [math]e^{i \pi} + 1 = 0[/math] [tex]e^{i \pi} + 1 = 0[/tex] Aha. [math]e^{i \pi} + 1 = 0[/math] 'math' Edited June 9, 2018 by wtf
Orion1 Posted June 21, 2018 Posted June 21, 2018 (edited) [math]F(x) = \int_{0}^{\infty} f(x) dx[/math] [math]\boxed{F(x) = \int_{0}^{\infty} f(x) dx} \tag{1}[/math] [math]\text{Equation} (1) \tag{}[/math]. Edited June 21, 2018 by Orion1 testing source code...
Orion1 Posted June 22, 2018 Posted June 22, 2018 (edited) test Edited June 22, 2018 by Orion1 testing source code...
Orion1 Posted November 30, 2018 Posted November 30, 2018 (edited) \[ F(x) = \int_{0}^{\infty} f(x) dx \] \[ F(x) = \int_{0}^{\infty} f(x) dx \] Edited November 30, 2018 by Orion1 testing source code...
Orion1 Posted December 11, 2018 Posted December 11, 2018 (edited) test Edited December 11, 2018 by Orion1 testing source code...
Orion1 Posted February 10, 2019 Posted February 10, 2019 On 12/11/2018 at 2:31 AM, Orion1 said: test Quote test test
Mordred Posted February 20, 2019 Posted February 20, 2019 (edited) [latex]\feynmandiagram [horizontal=a to b] { i1 -- [fermion] a -- [fermion] i2, a -- [photon] b, f1 -- [fermion] b -- [fermion] f2, };[/latex] k Tikz doesn't work ah well https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1601/1601.05437.pdf [latex]\copyright [/latex] Edited February 20, 2019 by Mordred
Orion1 Posted March 11, 2020 Posted March 11, 2020 (edited) [math]\dashbox{F(x) = \int_{a}^{b} f(x)dx }[/math] [math]\boxed{F(x) = \int_{a}^{b} f(x)dx}[/math] Edited March 11, 2020 by Orion1 test...
Orion1 Posted March 12, 2020 Posted March 12, 2020 (edited) [math]F(x) = \int_{a}^{b} f(x)dx[/math] [math]\boxed{F(x) = \int_{a}^{b} f(x) dx}[/math] Edited March 12, 2020 by Orion1 test...
Kartazion Posted March 24, 2020 Posted March 24, 2020 (edited) [math]\frac{total\ mass}{number\ of\ positions}=density\ per\ position[/math] Edited March 24, 2020 by Kartazion
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now