Yoon An Posted February 17, 2018 Posted February 17, 2018 Did hitachi and young use other types of recieve planes, especially planes which is evenly far away from the light source like a partial circle? I think dual property of light is just a joke. Moreover, bohr atomic model is quite unnatural. An atom has some sort of infinite energy source and pulls electrons? Plus,In Schrodinger equation, i 'the complex number' can be a REAL one? Does anyone believe in that kind of theory as a scientist? I have another hyphothesis about those problems which makes more sense. Maybe i am the only one who now realize those kind of theories are plain shit...
Strange Posted February 17, 2018 Posted February 17, 2018 What is the "Hitachi and Young" experiment? 1 hour ago, Yoon An said: I think dual property of light is just a joke. I don't suppose anyone cares what you think. 1 hour ago, Yoon An said: bohr atomic model is quite unnatural Well it is wrong, if that is what you mean. But it can be a useful approximation for some cases. 1 hour ago, Yoon An said: Plus,In Schrodinger equation, i 'the complex number' can be a REAL one? Does anyone believe in that kind of theory as a scientist? we use complex numbers in electrical and electronic engineering, in signal processing and in audio and optics. These are all real things, so your objection seems pretty hollow. 1 hour ago, Yoon An said: I have another hyphothesis about those problems which makes more sense. Science is not about "making sense"; does your hypothesis make mathematical predictions that match observations? Does it do this better than the existing theory? If not, then no one is interested. 1 hour ago, Yoon An said: Maybe i am the only one who now realize those kind of theories are plain shit... No, don't worry. There are plenty of other crackpots on science forums. 1
Sensei Posted February 17, 2018 Posted February 17, 2018 (edited) Particle nature of photon can be observed by naked eye in Photoelectric Effect. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photoelectric_effect or Pair Production: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pair_production Photons can have different energies/frequencies/wavelengths. 1 hour ago, Strange said: What is the "Hitachi and Young" experiment? He meant "Hitachi experiment" and "Young's experiment" separately. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PanqoHa_B6c Edited February 17, 2018 by Sensei
Strange Posted February 17, 2018 Posted February 17, 2018 1 minute ago, Sensei said: He meant "Hitachi experiment" and "Young's experiment" separately. I kind of thought he might, but I have never heard Hitachi's name in connection with this. So I have learned something new. Yay! I'm not sure how anyone can object to Young's experiment. We can see interference between waves in general, and light in particular, in all sorts of contexts from the colour of butterfly wings to waves on the beach.
swansont Posted February 17, 2018 Posted February 17, 2018 3 hours ago, Yoon An said: Moreover, bohr atomic model is quite unnatural. An atom has some sort of infinite energy source and pulls electrons? The Bohr model is known to be wrong, but it does not require an infinite energy source. 3 hours ago, Yoon An said: Plus,In Schrodinger equation, i 'the complex number' can be a REAL one? When you multiply by the complex conjugate, which you invariably do, you get a real result. 3 hours ago, Yoon An said: Does anyone believe in that kind of theory as a scientist? I have another hyphothesis about those problems which makes more sense. Quite a few physicists. The theory works. 3 hours ago, Yoon An said: Maybe i am the only one who now realize those kind of theories are plain shit... Meanwhile, those of us actually using the theories find that they work pretty well.
Yoon An Posted February 17, 2018 Author Posted February 17, 2018 (edited) Wait. if those equations can actually 'anticipate or calculate' approximate action of nature, they probably did the experiment first and make equations to fit for it. Just as Plank did. I can not draw or share my new more-make-sense models because maybe this can bring me some fortunes if im right. Just one more, Einstain says mass is energy and i think it is right. Of course mass can be represented as energy. but those time traveling ,parallel reality and relative atomic watch?? Who made those kind if SF joke? Edited February 17, 2018 by Yoon An
swansont Posted February 17, 2018 Posted February 17, 2018 1 hour ago, Yoon An said: I can not draw or share my new more-make-sense models because maybe this can bring me some fortunes if im right. ! Moderator Note Then there's nothing to discuss.
Recommended Posts