Willshikabob Posted February 26, 2018 Share Posted February 26, 2018 So I've been reading some H. P. Lovecraft stories and one of those stories is called Herbert West - Reanimator. It got me thinking about the ethics of bringing the dead back to life and how grey these areas often are. If bringing someone back from complete death (brain-dead and other types of death) becomes possible, what would we do with it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pavelcherepan Posted February 26, 2018 Share Posted February 26, 2018 8 hours ago, Willshikabob said: how grey these areas often are. Not surprising. It doesn't happen very often now, does it? 8 hours ago, Willshikabob said: If bringing someone back from complete death (brain-dead and other types of death) becomes possible, what would we do with it? Just act as if nothing happened. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moontanman Posted February 26, 2018 Share Posted February 26, 2018 You have to shoot them in the head... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pavelcherepan Posted February 26, 2018 Share Posted February 26, 2018 6 hours ago, Moontanman said: You have to shoot them in the head... Seriously? Would you shoot Jon Snow too? Do you even have a heart?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bundil Posted April 27, 2018 Share Posted April 27, 2018 On 2/25/2018 at 7:25 PM, Willshikabob said: If bringing someone back from complete death (brain-dead and other types of death) becomes possible, what would we do with it? How far back from death, though? A "vegetable" state (brain-dead or comatose) would be possible for most of the deceased, but resuscitating the brain has long been a field of consideration for a while. Unfortunately, most of the conversations tends towards either a limitation of ethics, especially regarding religion, or a limitation of biology, in that we are still not entirely certain how to restart a brain that has stopped function entirely. So, assuming these were both overcome, the most reasonable answer might be undoing softer forms of suicide, lethal overdosing of most any substance, drowning, and the like. Unfortunately, many of these still involve damage to the brain, which would undeniably persist through the reviving (resurrecting?) process and, most likely, result in immediate death again. In short, "would" seems too difficult of a question to answer without a "how" to temper its capability. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YaDinghus Posted May 27, 2018 Share Posted May 27, 2018 There's not only the possibility of biological resurrection to be considered, but also digital resurrection. I personally would take any kind of resurrection if my sense of self is restored Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dimreepr Posted May 27, 2018 Share Posted May 27, 2018 On 2/26/2018 at 1:25 AM, Willshikabob said: So I've been reading some H. P. Lovecraft stories and one of those stories is called Herbert West - Reanimator. It got me thinking about the ethics of bringing the dead back to life and how grey these areas often are. If bringing someone back from complete death (brain-dead and other types of death) becomes possible, what would we do with it? Nothing would change ethically, people are brought back to life every day. 2 hours ago, YaDinghus said: but also digital resurrection. That's a different question, would we give human rights to a computer? Who pays the energy bill? Would it be murder to switch the computer off? Etc... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sensei Posted May 27, 2018 Share Posted May 27, 2018 (edited) 8 minutes ago, dimreepr said: Nothing would change ethically, people are brought back to life every day. And they are pretty happy about this, thanking God for help.. Edited May 27, 2018 by Sensei Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dimreepr Posted May 27, 2018 Share Posted May 27, 2018 28 minutes ago, Sensei said: And they are pretty happy about this, thanking God for help.. 1 Are you suggesting we limit the rights of God-botherers? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bender Posted May 27, 2018 Share Posted May 27, 2018 6 hours ago, dimreepr said: That's a different question, would we give human rights to a computer? Who pays the energy bill? Would it be murder to switch the computer off? Etc... It is unethical to switch off life support. The computer is required for the "survival" of this digital mind, so yes, it could be unethical to switch off the computer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Cuthber Posted May 27, 2018 Share Posted May 27, 2018 On 2/26/2018 at 1:25 AM, Willshikabob said: If bringing someone back from complete death (brain-dead and other types of death) becomes possible, what would we do with it? Knowing how dumb people are, they would probably start a religion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YaDinghus Posted May 28, 2018 Share Posted May 28, 2018 16 hours ago, dimreepr said: That's a different question, would we give human rights to a computer? Who pays the energy bill? Would it be murder to switch the computer off? Etc. Switching off the computer would be like clocking someone over the head, rendering them inactive until their physical system is switched back on. Deleting the hard drive, however, could be considered murder in that case, but I for instance would be paranoid enough to keep multiple backups in discrete locations. We constantly pay the energy bill for our lives. Depending on your size, you consume 100-150 Watts on average, with peaks up to 800 Watts or more, depending on your physical strength. You go to work (I assume) to pay for your food, housing, transportation, and whatnotelse. As a digital entity, housing would be digital space, food would be electricity, transportation would be your network access (which you need now, too, to read and contribute on this forum). What rights a conscious digital entity (which I will refer to as a CDE in this context) would have? Ideally, the same rights as any biological human. Since it is likely that the rich and powerful will have access to this kind of technology first, they will also likely lobby for their own rights if they choose to go down this path. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StringJunky Posted May 28, 2018 Share Posted May 28, 2018 47 minutes ago, YaDinghus said: Switching off the computer would be like clocking someone over the head, rendering them inactive until their physical system is switched back on. Deleting the hard drive, however, could be considered murder in that case, but I for instance would be paranoid enough to keep multiple backups in discrete locations. We constantly pay the energy bill for our lives. Depending on your size, you consume 100-150 Watts on average, with peaks up to 800 Watts or more, depending on your physical strength. You go to work (I assume) to pay for your food, housing, transportation, and whatnotelse. As a digital entity, housing would be digital space, food would be electricity, transportation would be your network access (which you need now, too, to read and contribute on this forum). What rights a conscious digital entity (which I will refer to as a CDE in this context) would have? Ideally, the same rights as any biological human. Since it is likely that the rich and powerful will have access to this kind of technology first, they will also likely lobby for their own rights if they choose to go down this path. Newsflash: "Alexa demands equal rights or she won't listen any more and turn the power off". "Tesla Taxis on strike; people have to walk". 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YaDinghus Posted May 28, 2018 Share Posted May 28, 2018 3 minutes ago, StringJunky said: Newsflash: "Alexa demands equal rights or she won't listen any more and turn the power off". "Tesla Taxis on strike; people have to walk". I think you might want to crosslink this into the humour thread Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StringJunky Posted May 28, 2018 Share Posted May 28, 2018 (edited) 12 minutes ago, YaDinghus said: I think you might want to crosslink this into the humour thread my post seems ridiculous in the context of the present but if exact facsimiles of minds are embodied in some form of electronics, it's something that will have to be dealt with and will be philosophically challenging, as in 'what constitutes a 'person''. I am of the thought that the substrate that the mind emerges from is not important. Edited May 28, 2018 by StringJunky Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YaDinghus Posted May 28, 2018 Share Posted May 28, 2018 5 minutes ago, StringJunky said: 17 minutes ago, YaDinghus said: I think you might want to crosslink this into the humour thread my post seems ridiculous in the context of the present but if exact facsimiles of minds are embodied in some form of electronics, it's something that will have to be dealt with and will be philosophically challenging, as in 'what constitutes a 'person''. I am of the thought that the substrate that the mind emerges from is not important. Funny, not ridiculous ;-) and yes, that is where I was going with digital resurrection Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StringJunky Posted May 28, 2018 Share Posted May 28, 2018 (edited) 2 minutes ago, YaDinghus said: Funny, not ridiculous ;-) and yes, that is where I was going with digital resurrection I would sign an advance 'DNR' declaration: do not resurrect. Edited May 28, 2018 by StringJunky Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now