Buket Posted March 11, 2018 Posted March 11, 2018 (edited) Richard Terrile claims that smallest microscobic organisms are pixelated and that shows that the universe is a simulation. Is that an accurate claim? Edited March 11, 2018 by Buket
Strange Posted March 11, 2018 Posted March 11, 2018 Without a reference to the source, it is impossible to say. But as no one else has spotted this (and we have looked at things much smaller than microscopic organisms) I would assume not.
Buket Posted March 11, 2018 Author Posted March 11, 2018 2 hours ago, Strange said: Without a reference to the source, it is impossible to say. But as no one else has spotted this (and we have looked at things much smaller than microscopic organisms) I would assume not. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=tOLlroyYxRg
swansont Posted March 11, 2018 Posted March 11, 2018 45 minutes ago, Buket said: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=tOLlroyYxRg That's a 20 minute video. Can you be more specific about when he made the claim?
Buket Posted March 11, 2018 Author Posted March 11, 2018 2 minutes ago, swansont said: That's a 20 minute video. Can you be more specific about when he made the claim? There is not a scientific article about this claim. You can google the claim.
swansont Posted March 11, 2018 Posted March 11, 2018 Quote “Even things that we think of as continuous – time, energy, space, volume – all have a finite limit to their size. If that’s the case, then our universe is both computable and finite. Those properties allow the universe to be simulated,” Terrile said. “Quite frankly, if we are not living in a simulation, it is an extraordinarily unlikely circumstance,” he added. So who has created this simulation? “Our future selves,” said Terrile. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/oct/11/simulated-world-elon-musk-the-matrix So he's basing this on time, energy, space, volume having a finite size (which is conjecture) and also time travel.
StringJunky Posted March 11, 2018 Posted March 11, 2018 (edited) 2 minutes ago, Buket said: There is not a scientific article about this claim. You can google the claim. That which has no evidence can be refuted with no evidence. Edited March 11, 2018 by StringJunky
swansont Posted March 11, 2018 Posted March 11, 2018 3 minutes ago, Buket said: There is not a scientific article about this claim. You can google the claim. Although I did, that's not how this works. You started a thread, meaning you have an obligation to present relevant information. All I asked for was a time in a 20 minute video for when he discusses this. I don't owe you the effort of watching a 20 minute video.
Buket Posted March 11, 2018 Author Posted March 11, 2018 Is there any experiment that shows the universe is pixelated?
Strange Posted March 11, 2018 Posted March 11, 2018 (edited) 1 minute ago, Buket said: Is there any experiment that shows the universe is pixelated? No. All attempts to test this have been consistent with space being continuous. And even if there were, it doesn't really lend any credence to his idea. Edited March 11, 2018 by Strange
Demoguy Posted March 11, 2018 Posted March 11, 2018 Pixelation is an interesting turn of phrase. Pixelation is an observed effect and refers specifically to a visual observation. What may be referred to as pixelation visually, may simply be the visual deconstruction of something that was observed previously to be solid into smaller, though no less 'real,' parts.
Buket Posted March 11, 2018 Author Posted March 11, 2018 1 hour ago, Strange said: No. All attempts to test this have been consistent with space being continuous. And even if there were, it doesn't really lend any credence to his idea. I guess you call it popscience
Strange Posted March 11, 2018 Posted March 11, 2018 Pop-science usually refers to simplified (and hence rather inaccurate) descriptions of science in the popular press. This sounds like straightforward crackpottery.
Butch Posted March 13, 2018 Posted March 13, 2018 Sounds like crack pottery... But it also sounds like qm, however he did not micro as far as that. On 3/11/2018 at 11:34 AM, Strange said: Pop-science usually refers to simplified (and hence rather inaccurate) descriptions of science in the popular press. This sounds like straightforward crackpottery. Do you mean the realm of Dr. M K?
Strange Posted March 14, 2018 Posted March 14, 2018 (edited) 47 minutes ago, Butch said: Do you mean the realm of Dr. M K? MK? Martin Luther King? Edited March 14, 2018 by Strange
Sensei Posted March 14, 2018 Posted March 14, 2018 (edited) On 11.03.2018 at 10:24 AM, Buket said: Richard Terrile claims that smallest microscobic organisms are pixelated... On 11.03.2018 at 2:42 PM, Buket said: Is there any experiment that shows the universe is pixelated? Microscopic organisms are made of millions/billions of atoms/molecules.. If you want to see single electron or single alpha traces, search YouTube for "Cloud Chamber" (particle with high kinetic energy, while passing through medium, ionize it (causes secondary rays (delta rays), and then there are even tertiary rays (epsilon rays) caused by secondary rays)).. All this causes that traces are visible by naked human eye.. "pixelated" is wrong word. Quantized is more appropriate. Pixel is used in 2D. 3 dimensional version of pixel is called voxel, by the way.. Edited March 14, 2018 by Sensei
Strange Posted March 14, 2018 Posted March 14, 2018 5 hours ago, Sensei said: If you want to see single electron or single alpha traces, search YouTube for "Cloud Chamber" Even more impressive than that, you can find images of atoms and molecules where you can see the shape of electron orbitals which have the (smooth) shape predicted by theory.
Butch Posted March 15, 2018 Posted March 15, 2018 On 3/13/2018 at 8:18 PM, Strange said: MK? Martin Luther King? No, Michio.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now