studiot Posted April 18, 2018 Posted April 18, 2018 1 hour ago, StuartL said: But like I said, question everything. Which is exactly what I have done and you have yet to answer. It was only a simple question as well.
StuartL Posted April 18, 2018 Author Posted April 18, 2018 Another little question just occurred to me: How can quantum entangled particles communicate over vast distances instantaneously, when nothing can travel faster than the speed of light? Easily, if they exist, both in a state of having vast distances between them, and no distance between them, simultaneously. Just a thought.
Mordred Posted April 18, 2018 Posted April 18, 2018 (edited) Emtangled particles do not communicate nor interact with one another at FTL. More than just a thought Edited April 18, 2018 by Mordred
Endy0816 Posted April 19, 2018 Posted April 19, 2018 54 minutes ago, StuartL said: Another little question just occurred to me: How can quantum entangled particles communicate over vast distances instantaneously, when nothing can travel faster than the speed of light? Easily, if they exist, both in a state of having vast distances between them, and no distance between them, simultaneously. Its more akin to cutting a coin in two. Finding out if your half is heads or tails, tells you the other. 1
Mordred Posted April 19, 2018 Posted April 19, 2018 2 hours ago, Endy0816 said: Its more akin to cutting a coin in two. Finding out if your half is heads or tails, tells you the other. Accurate analogy.
Endy0816 Posted April 19, 2018 Posted April 19, 2018 (edited) 39 minutes ago, Mordred said: Accurate analogy. TY, I think of the story about the kid's nickel breaking in two every time. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hollow_Nickel_Case Easier to relate to. There's still some QM weirdness I don't quite understand, but at least can grasp the more practical aspects. Edited April 19, 2018 by Endy0816
StuartL Posted April 27, 2018 Author Posted April 27, 2018 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-fZVQzcqyKU Planck time - “Singularity of time” All time present all the time. Flow is an illusion. Multiverse somehow. Time is probably not as simple as one Planck time following another (granular)...probably something as yet undiscovered. On 2018-04-14 at 9:03 AM, Strange said: This is a science forum. Not a stoned hippy ramblings forum. On 2018-04-17 at 3:34 AM, swansont said: No physics here, as far as I can tell.
swansont Posted April 28, 2018 Posted April 28, 2018 7 hours ago, StuartL said: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-fZVQzcqyKU Planck time - “Singularity of time” All time present all the time. Flow is an illusion. Multiverse somehow. Time is probably not as simple as one Planck time following another (granular)...probably something as yet undiscovered. Still no physics. Unfortunately for you, this is a science site. If you can't bring science into your conjecture, there's no point in continuing.
Recommended Posts