DatLemonDoe Posted March 17, 2018 Posted March 17, 2018 Hi There is a big hole in my understanding of integrated rate laws, and I've been having a hard time finding what it is that i'm not understanding. I would assume that it's a very small idea that i'm missing. Anyway, here's my problem, I would assume that I will say some false statement at some point, hence me getting weird results. Say you have the reaction A + B --) C And let's assume that the global order of the reaction is 2. We are also given the initial concentration of A aswell as the contentration of A at a certain point in time (t) The integrated rate law would be 1/[A]=1/[A]0+kt. We can use that equation to find a value for k, since we know every other variable. Now, here's where I get lost. Say we do a second experiment where the intial concentration of B is different, but the initial concentration of A remains the same. We once again find the concentration of A at the sime point in time (t) If we once again find the value of k in the integrated rate law, won't it's value be different? Changing the initial concentration of B has had for effect to change the rate of the reaction, and therefore the concentration of A at the same point in time is no longer the same. However, t and [A]0 are still the same. Now I know that the value of k doesn't change if you change the concentration of a reactant, so I'm confused as to why I get those results. Hopefully It wasn't too confusing. If it was, ask me questions and I will gladly clarify. Thanks a lot, I appreciate your time and kindness. 1
studiot Posted March 18, 2018 Posted March 18, 2018 (edited) Good morning, datlemondoe and welcome to SF. The second order integrated rate law is only as you state if the concentration of A is equal to that of B, otherwise it is more complicated as follows. If [math]\left[ A \right] = \left[ B \right][/math] Then [math]rate = - \frac{{d{{\left[ A \right]}_t}}}{{dt}} = k\left[ A \right]\left[ B \right][/math] But since [math]\left[ A \right] = \left[ B \right][/math] we have [math]rate = - \frac{{d{{\left[ A \right]}_t}}}{{dt}} = k{\left[ A \right]_t}^2[/math] On integration [math]\frac{1}{{{{\left[ A \right]}_t}}} = {\frac{1}{{\left[ A \right]}}_0} + kt[/math] Which is the expression you have. However if [math]\left[ A \right] \ne \left[ B \right][/math] Then [math]rate = - \frac{{d{{\left[ A \right]}_t}}}{{dt}} = k\left[ A \right]\left[ B \right][/math] We cannot replace the and the integration is more difficult. The result is [math]kt = \frac{1}{{{{\left[ A \right]}_0} - {{\left[ B \right]}_0}}}\ln \frac{{{{\left[ A \right]}_t}{{\left[ B \right]}_0}}}{{{{\left[ A \right]}_0}{{\left[ A \right]}_t}}}[/math] But k remains the same constant. Does this help? Edited March 18, 2018 by studiot
DatLemonDoe Posted March 18, 2018 Author Posted March 18, 2018 Yes, that makes a lot of sense. Thank you very much, have a great day
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now