Are here smart people?

[Oleg__Gorokhov]

I did answer to people on their questions.
It's not the spam!
Do you see the difference?
How can I answer to them in else way during the first day if I get more than 5 questions?  Then limit questions .(your rules are  ... not well)

I presented to you the biggest discoveries in physics? THE BIGGEST DISCOVERIES EVER 
THESE DISCOVERIES COMPLETELY CHANGE OUR UNDERSTANDING OF THE UNIVERSE AND GIVE US THE ACCESS TO NEW COLOSSAL CLEAN ENERGY.

Why no one reads the link: https://goo.gl/1q9HaU
No ONE cares?

As I has said before, -- Unfortunately the whole text is too big to be put here.

Are here smart people?

Please, read the links:
https://goo.gl/aETJdQ
https://goo.gl/YffRQL
https://goo.gl/1q9HaU

 

Edited April 3, 2018 by Oleg__Gorokhov

[Strange]

1 minute ago, Oleg__Gorokhov said:

It's not the spam!

Everyone has the same limit in the first day.

It is to protect against spam, not saying that your posts are spam. 

1 minute ago, Oleg__Gorokhov said:

I presented to you the biggest discoveries in physics? THE BIGGEST DISCOVERIES EVER 

I'm sure one more day will not hurt.

Have you built a successful generator using your new physics?

13 minutes ago, Oleg__Gorokhov said:

Why no one reads the link: https://goo.gl/1q9HaU

Why don't you read the rules of the forum.

13 minutes ago, Oleg__Gorokhov said:

Unfortunately the whole text is too big to be put here.

It might not be if you removed all the waffle and repetition.

All you need to show is:

• The predictions of standard physics
• The predictions of your new equation
• Results from experimental measurements

Then we can see which model best matches the data. (I skimmed through your web page and couldn't see any experimental results.)

[Oleg__Gorokhov]

1 hour ago, Strange said:

Everyone has the same limit in the first day.

It is to protect against spam, not saying that your posts are spam. 

I'm sure one more day will not hurt.

Have you built a successful generator using your new physics?

Why don't you read the rules of the forum.

It might not be if you removed all the waffle and repetition.

All you need to show is:

• The predictions of standard physics
• The predictions of your new equation
• Results from experimental measurements

Then we can see which model best matches the data. (I skimmed through your web page and couldn't see any experimental results.)

"(I skimmed through your web page and couldn't see any experimental results.)"
Really?
These are all the results of experiments!
Any stone goes so (when free-falling)! Any stone! Can you get it?  This table contains  only the experimental results! ONLY!  USE the standard formula for Displacement = a*t^2/2

I agree with the standard formula for the displacement.  (D=a*t^2/2)
Can you get it?

I have explainded and proved (through the simplest math and the elementary logics) that now erroneously Work is calculated that was not done and also now erroneously Energy is calculated, which was not spent !

Engage the logics!
Dear Strange, please, wake up!

The same with the electromagnets (there are all the experimental numbers, only the experimental numbers )

Please wake up, man.

Read it CAREFULLY!

 

Edited April 3, 2018 by Oleg__Gorokhov

[Strange]

15 minutes ago, Oleg__Gorokhov said:

Any stone goes so (when free-falling) !!!!!! Any !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! This table contains  only the experimental results! ONLY!

1. They appear to be calculated, not measured.

2. Can you describe how the measurements were made.

3. You have already said that these numbers are the same as standard physics; therefore they cannot be used to test your model.

4. Please provide the predictions made by your mode which are different from standard physics and the corresponding experimental results.

Thanks you.

[OlegGorokhov]

2 hours ago, Strange said:

1. They appear to be calculated, not measured.
2. Can you describe how the measurements were made.
3. You have already said that these numbers are the same as standard physics; therefore they cannot be used to test your model.

I DO NOT DISAGREE with the current formula Displacement = a*t^2/2
I agree with it cos there have been conducted many experiments to prove this formula. Can you understand it?

2 hours ago, Strange said:

4. Please provide the predictions made by your mode which are different from standard physics and the corresponding experimental results.

My data (displacements) are not diffrent from standard physics. Can you get it?

I explain WHY the “current” formula for Work and Energy

is erroneous, since it relates the Work (W) of the gravitational Force (F) to the displacement of the pushed object (D)

Please, read the whole texts (on Medium) carefully! 

https://goo.gl/aETJdQ     (3 min read)
https://goo.gl/YffRQL      (5 min read)
https://goo.gl/1q9HaU    (30 min read)

 

P.S.
Thank the admins for unblocking my 1-st account already today.

Quote

 

 

 

Edited April 3, 2018 by OlegGorokhov

[swansont]

2 hours ago, Oleg__Gorokhov said:

I did answer to people on their questions.
It's not the spam!

No. But other people do spam us, so that's why we instituted that measure.

2 hours ago, Oleg__Gorokhov said:

Do you see the difference?
How can I answer to them in else way during the first day if I get more than 5 questions?  Then limit questions .(your rules are  ... not well)

I presented to you the biggest discoveries in physics? THE BIGGEST DISCOVERIES EVER 
THESE DISCOVERIES COMPLETELY CHANGE OUR UNDERSTANDING OF THE UNIVERSE AND GIVE US THE ACCESS TO NEW COLOSSAL CLEAN ENERGY.

Why no one reads the link: https://goo.gl/1q9HaU
No ONE cares?

As I has said before, -- Unfortunately the whole text is too big to be put here.

Are here smart people?

Please, read the links:
https://goo.gl/aETJdQ
https://goo.gl/YffRQL
https://goo.gl/1q9HaU

 

Stop with the links. Discussion happens here.