Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Mass and energy generally follow the classsical conservation dictum

"Matter can be neither created or destroyed"

 

But money can be all to easily destroyed.

 

 

Posted
35 minutes ago, studiot said:

Mass and energy generally follow the classsical conservation dictum

"Matter can be neither created or destroyed"

 

But money can be all to easily destroyed.

 

 

Did you get a new toy? :) 

Posted
1 hour ago, studiot said:

Mass and energy generally follow the classsical conservation dictum

"Matter can be neither created or destroyed"

 

But money can be all to easily destroyed.

1

Because money isn't based in reality, it's based on a promise and it's all too easy to break a promise even if you don't want to; which is a reality just not a conserved one :ph34r:

1 minute ago, Endy0816 said:

Increases the value of all other cash in the process.

That depends on "the" why? 

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, studiot said:

But money can be all to easily destroyed.

Money used to be made of regular precious rare material (and after introduction of paper/cotton money, it was at least officially exchangeable to precious metal equivalent on demand *) for significant portion of development of human civilization. To literally destroy Gold or Silver atom people would need help of quantum physicists (photodisintegration and/or cause artificial radioactivity and/or neutron/proton capture etc. etc.)

*) This was just recently changed just a few decades ago in early '70 years.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nixon_shock

 

Edited by Sensei
Posted
59 minutes ago, dimreepr said:

Because money isn't based in reality, it's based on a promise and it's all too easy to break a promise even if you don't want to; which is a reality just not a conserved one :ph34r:

That depends on "the" why? 

Well more for cash, but if you were to burn a dollar that makes all other dollars more scarce and thus more valuable as a result.

Posted
24 minutes ago, Endy0816 said:

Well more for cash, but if you were to burn a dollar that makes all other dollars more scarce and thus more valuable as a result.

Well in that why you are correct, what if the why is, you burnt all the money?  

Posted
1 hour ago, Sensei said:

Money used to be made of regular precious rare material (and after introduction of paper/cotton money, it was at least officially exchangeable to precious metal equivalent on demand *) for significant portion of development of human civilization. To literally destroy Gold or Silver atom people would need help of quantum physicists (photodisintegration and/or cause artificial radioactivity and/or neutron/proton capture etc. etc.)

Money based on precious metals depended on the available supply, not the total amount that existed. What you could dig up from the ground changed the supply.

Posted
Just now, swansont said:

Money based on precious metals depended on the available supply, not the total amount that existed. What you could dig up from the ground changed the supply.

Not to mention, it is a very poor substitute for food.

Posted

Money is useful to regulate the dispensation of scarce resources. Basically, it's a rationing system. What we call economy is an emergent system from this rationing function and human psychology, and in this system, money is a basic resource, and value an essential property. I guess you could compare it to a Field in QM, where Money is the exchange boson for the force (value) exchange 

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, YaDinghus said:

Field in QM, where Money is the exchange boson for the force (value) exchange 

oh great just great is that where QM got the term " state "  lol particle/system state/property based on economics lol works for me :P

Edited by Mordred
Posted
2 hours ago, YaDinghus said:

Money is useful to regulate the dispensation of scarce resources. Basically, it's a rationing system. What we call economy is an emergent system from this rationing function and human psychology, and in this system, money is a basic resource, and value an essential property. I guess you could compare it to a Field in QM, where Money is the exchange boson for the force (value) exchange 

YaDinghus, welcome, I think you will be an asset to the forum.

 

+1

Posted
38 minutes ago, studiot said:

YaDinghus, welcome, I think you will be an asset to the forum.

Thanks. I aim to be useful in life. I don't always miss that mark ;-)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.