HansLaroes Posted May 20, 2018 Posted May 20, 2018 Hello, For a Chemistry project i have to determine the starch concentration of two solutions of which i only know the extinction (which i had of course determined using a colorimeter) using a calibration line plotted in excel derived from samples of which the concentration + extinction was known. The problem is that i forgot to note the molarity of the starch-solution - from which i derived my samples -, even though i did note the mass concentration in g/L. Therefore i made a graph in excel with the concentration is in g/L and the extinction. Is this a valid relation? Or do i need to know the molarity of the starch-solution? Best regards, Hans
studiot Posted May 20, 2018 Posted May 20, 2018 Well since [math]molarconcentration = \frac{{massconcentration}}{{molecularmass}}[/math] and the molecular mass is a constant the form of your graph is OK, but obviously for any result that needs to involve the the molar mass you will need that constant.
BabcockHall Posted May 23, 2018 Posted May 23, 2018 Unless the starch molecule has a defined number of glucose monomers, I don't see how it can have a single molecular weight. Polymers are not my strongest suit, but it might be possible to define an average molecular weight.
studiot Posted May 23, 2018 Posted May 23, 2018 2 hours ago, BabcockHall said: Unless the starch molecule has a defined number of glucose monomers, I don't see how it can have a single molecular weight. Polymers are not my strongest suit, but it might be possible to define an average molecular weight. I presume there is a particular starch involved. This may be for a pharmacy course and pharmacists often use average molecular weights. And 'starch' is a common constituent of pills various.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now