ydoaPs Posted July 14, 2005 Posted July 14, 2005 When I use the term "creationist" I mean people to which any of the following websites apply: http://www.reandev.com/taliban/ http://drdino.com/ http://emporium.turnpike.net/C/cs/ http://www.icr.org/ http://www.creationresearch.org/ http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/ http://www.talkorigins.org/ http://www.answersingenesis.org/ that is just the tip of the iceberg. signs of a creationist(besides the obvious): personal attacks ignoring evidence using flat out lies as evidence using the bible as evidence(bible isn't even a resource in english papers) using a lack of evidence as evidence strawman flame troll give the "i'm brainwashed" vibe have no clue what the big bang or evolution actually say(and in many cases can't tell the difference) spam tending towards gullibility so far, i have found this to be really accurate. (that's how i knew, herme3 ) if i missed some, just add your own.
Cornelius Posted July 15, 2005 Posted July 15, 2005 Thank you for attacking Christians, I'm sure you make every Evolutionist extremely proud, considering you represent them just like the sites above represent all Christians.
ydoaPs Posted July 15, 2005 Author Posted July 15, 2005 thank you for the example. you are a prime example
Hellbender Posted July 15, 2005 Posted July 15, 2005 Thank you for attacking Christians, I'm sure you make every Evolutionist extremely proud, considering you represent them just like the sites above represent all Christians. Can't you read? Not all Christians are creationists. I recall you have said yourself that this is so. Please don't strawman.
Dak Posted July 15, 2005 Posted July 15, 2005 although, it may have been tactful to say "sighns of a mental creationist", to exclude creationists who dont foam at the mouth. there are a few sane creationists. apparently.
ydoaPs Posted July 15, 2005 Author Posted July 15, 2005 i appologize to the few sane creationists. from here on, the term "creationist" refers to the vast majority of creationists. they tend to exhibit said qualities and probably ones that i haven't listed. i know it is accurate, because i have identified several creationists using said properties.
Cornelius Posted July 15, 2005 Posted July 15, 2005 thank you for the example. you are a prime example I was being sarcastic. I just don't understand why you're attacking Creationists (For the other guy, I meant "Creationists", I just couldn't think right because I was mad at the thread-maker's prejudice post).
Cornelius Posted July 15, 2005 Posted July 15, 2005 It's not very nice...you big bully! I'm gonna call your mommy and tell her all about what you said!
-Demosthenes- Posted July 15, 2005 Posted July 15, 2005 This could be insulting to those who thought they were upstanding regular posters in this forum, only to find out they are an idiot.
Aardvark Posted July 15, 2005 Posted July 15, 2005 there are a few sane creationists. apparently. Creationism is a mental disease. By definition all creationists are insane. They should be locked up in lunatic asylums and not released until cured.
-Demosthenes- Posted July 15, 2005 Posted July 15, 2005 I'm not ashamed that according to some definitions I'm a creationist. Your are claiming this makes me stupid, insane, and unappreciative of science? Thanks, quite the thread guys.
ydoaPs Posted July 15, 2005 Author Posted July 15, 2005 not only are they insane, there are evil as well. All creationists are evil and everything they say is a lie.
ydoaPs Posted July 15, 2005 Author Posted July 15, 2005 I'm not ashamed that according to some definitions I'm a creationist. Your are claiming this makes me stupid' date=' insane, and unappreciative of science? Thanks, quite the thread guys.[/quote'] only if you have the properties listed
-Demosthenes- Posted July 15, 2005 Posted July 15, 2005 So if you are a creationalist and have the properties listed then you have the properties listed. Now I am confused. This is truely science at its best.
ydoaPs Posted July 15, 2005 Author Posted July 15, 2005 you seem to not understand. this thread if for distinguishing the people that believe in intelligent design from the mouth foaming crazys.
Aardvark Posted July 15, 2005 Posted July 15, 2005 this thread if for distinguishing the people that believe in intelligent design from the mouth foaming crazys. There is no difference, therefore no distinction can be made.
-Demosthenes- Posted July 15, 2005 Posted July 15, 2005 Thank you for changing the thread because I felt uncomfortable. edit: I guess Advark doesn't want to change the thread.
ydoaPs Posted July 15, 2005 Author Posted July 15, 2005 i didn't change anything but your misunderstanding of it. i guess you missed the first part of the thread.
-Demosthenes- Posted July 15, 2005 Posted July 15, 2005 i didn't change anything but yourmisunderstanding of it. i guess you missed the first part of the thread. Oh please this: When I use the term "creationist" I mean people to which any of the following websites apply:... that is just the tip of the iceberg. signs of a creationist(besides the obvious): personal attacks ignoring evidence using flat out lies as evidence using the bible as evidence(bible isn't even a resource in english papers) using a lack of evidence as evidence strawman flame troll give the "i'm brainwashed" vibe have no clue what the big bang or evolution actually say(and in many cases can't tell the difference) spam tending towards gullibility Is exactly like saying this: When I use the term "evolutionist" I mean people to which any of the following things apply: Believe monkeys turn into people Think that life can come from rocks Stupid Don't know theology (and so on) See how rediculous it is? How does it feel?
ydoaPs Posted July 15, 2005 Author Posted July 15, 2005 well, your version doesn't apply to the majority, now does it?
-Demosthenes- Posted July 15, 2005 Posted July 15, 2005 No, but it's the creationalist point of view of evolutionists, much like your post is the evolutionist view of creationist. Do you really think that the majority of creationalists do all these things? Sure the majority on this site, but that isn't a very good representation of creationalists. Only the ones who want to proove us all wrong post here.
ydoaPs Posted July 15, 2005 Author Posted July 15, 2005 it's not a POV. it is fact. it isn't only this site....it is tha majority.
-Demosthenes- Posted July 15, 2005 Posted July 15, 2005 Well how nice of you to assume that the majority of people that believe in God are idiots.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now