Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, Taingorz said:

No, it isn't your field. Nor does it have too. You can think for yorself, yes? Do not trust blindly on 'experts' thay had a numerous time wrong in the past. Think for yourself, that would be some revolution!

 

Yeah, someone has to stand up to the experts! 

Posted
Just now, Moontanman said:

 

Yeah, someone has to stand up to the experts! 

It is not about standing up to the experts, You don't get it.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Taingorz said:

No, it isn't your field. Nor does it have too. You can think for yorself, yes? Do not trust blindly on 'experts' thay had a numerous time wrong in the past. Think for yourself, that would be some revolution!

What is it then when people have a very different opinion about something, they are automatically called 'trolls"?

My opinion is that it is done to keep the integrity of their  belief system in tact.

They can't handle independent thinkers , because they destroy their group think,

 

Why on earth would you think someone call you a troll? I mean you give such good evidence, book covers, memes, unsupported assertions, really dude you seem to have a persecution complex..., 

Posted
Just now, David Hine said:

The best hint I can give you, that until you have studied the little book I'm forbidden to mention here, is that the Aether concept will need to be re-introduced. This also has an interesting maths description, but not for consumption, until the 'big bang'  nonsense is firmly consigned to where it belongs - in the bin of science follies, David

 

Well considering I have studied that Book, seems a bit insulting to call it little, and considering you seem to be completely clueless to what it actually says i guess i should have worn my god glasses when i read it...

 

Now one more time please tell me about your problems with the god particle... 

Posted
4 minutes ago, Moontanman said:

Why on earth would you think someone call you a troll? I mean you give such good evidence, book covers, memes, unsupported assertions, really dude you seem to have a persecution complex..., 

lol, yes you are funny. But nothing more.

Posted

Now, take e.g. the Red Shift. one can clearly see that that is no evidence at all for the big bang.

 

And so it with all the so called 'evidence' 

 

there never was a big bang.

Posted
Just now, Taingorz said:

Now, take e.g. the Red Shift. one can clearly see that that is no evidence at all for the big bang.

 

And so it with all the so called 'evidence' 

 

there never was a big bang.

Citation please... 

Just now, David Hine said:

Turn off your computer. Now read your KJ version of Genesis very carefully, and ask Jesus to reveal His Word to you. If you sincerely want that, He will open you eyes to His Word, and its meaning. You will then see the folly that we call secular science. Once The Holy Spirit guides you to the truth, man made lies will just become the nonsense they are, David

Again, please tell me about the god particle and why you think it's nonsense please! 

Posted
10 minutes ago, David Hine said:

The best hint I can give you, that until you have studied the little book I'm forbidden to mention here, is that the Aether concept will need to be re-introduced. This also has an interesting maths description, but not for consumption, until the 'big bang'  nonsense is firmly consigned to where it belongs - in the bin of science follies, David

O do absolutely agree with you here that the Aether has to be broughyt back! Absolutely!

The enormous stupid theories of relativity where used to let  go of the Aether.

O my , don't start on how stupid the relativity theory is!

2 minutes ago, Moontanman said:

Citation please... 

Citation? Gee, a lot of logical fallacies going on here!

Posted
Just now, Taingorz said:

O do absolutely agree with you here that the Aether has to be broughyt back! Absolutely!

The enormous stupid theories of relativity where used to let  go of the Aether.

O my , don't start on how stupid the relativity theory is!

Citation please, stop making assertions without evidence.. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Moontanman said:

Citation please, stop making assertions without evidence.. 

Asking for citations again? why? Some thinking is allowed, yes?

Or do you only listen to the Higpriests of 'science'? Like einstein, hawking, maybe Bill Nye ...How ugly he is!!!! Man o man!

Ah well he is no scientist of course, But well, Dawkins?  

Posted
!

Moderator Note

Given the level of discourse I am going to leave this locked, but will say once again, on the chance that Taingorz will read and comprehend:

A scientist saying the universe came from nothing ≠ the Big Bang theory saying the universe came from nothing

 

I have bolded the parts that are different to aid you in your study.

 
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.