Jump to content

Water and air molecules


Jakewhothinks

Recommended Posts

I have a question, does air molecules move the same way water molecules do. So I vape and when I exhale I watch how the concentration of the vape cloud moves. I feel like it moves the exact same way the water molecules move if you dyed water and pour it into a clear thing of water.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Jakewhothinks said:

I have a question, does air molecules move the same way water molecules do. So I vape and when I exhale I watch how the concentration of the vape cloud moves. I feel like it moves the exact same way the water molecules move if you dyed water and pour it into a clear thing of water.

Hello and welcome. Well you are comparing a gas that you exhale in another "gas" with dyed water that you pour in other water. So I would say that from this comparison no. They do not "move" the same. :P Let's wait for other members and for sure will give you a more educated opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jakewhothinks said:

I have a question, does air molecules move the same way water molecules do. So I vape and when I exhale I watch how the concentration of the vape cloud moves. I feel like it moves the exact same way the water molecules move if you dyed water and pour it into a clear thing of water.

They are both fluids, so I would say the interactions would be largely the same. There will be differences because of the different densities and speeds of the molecules in each case, but the patterns of mixing you get with, say, smoke and dyed water are similar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jakewhothinks said:

I have a question, does air molecules move the same way water molecules do. So I vape and when I exhale I watch how the concentration of the vape cloud moves. I feel like it moves the exact same way the water molecules move if you dyed water and pour it into a clear thing of water.

Good question Jake and a good start to this forum.  +1

 

Both gases and liquids are fluids, which means that they deform to take the shape of their container - bottle, bucket hole in the ground whatever, so what is the difference?

The basic difference is that gases expand to fill a container, liquids do not, that is their volume does not change when transferred from one container to another.

A more subtle difference is that liquids have a 'free surface' and gases do not.
An example of a  free surface is the surface of the sea or the top part of your beer in a glass.

 

 

5 minutes ago, Strange said:

There will be differences because of the different densities and speeds of the molecules in each cas

Tempting but not actually true.

I agree with the rest.

Edited by studiot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, studiot said:

Tempting but not actually true.

I'm surprised. I have seen a plume of gas from a volcano rising hundreds (possibly thousands) of metres in the air before forming patterns like this (up the other way, of course) on a much larger scale:

 cb6039cc6af3267a3fb6e22042d692fd--creati

 

I assumed the difference in scale was due to the difference in density. If not, what does enable the patterns in air to be much larger than those of ink drops in water? Is it just the scale of the phenomenon: massive amounts of fluid mixing on very large scales versus a tiny amount mixing on small scales?

Kind of a fractal effect? That sounds quite plausible now I think of it; the small scale mixing within the gas plume was probably similar to what is going on in the glass...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is tempting to use the simple kinetic theory, which compares the single component phases of  liquids and gases (and solids) at conditions well away from the phase interface lines on the material phase diagram.

The closer to that line you get the closer the densities and molecular speeds converge, until they are equal on the line.

Magma is neither a single component nor a single phase material so its rheology is correspondingly complex.

There is also the transition from laminar flow to turbulent flow to consider in your example.
A similar, though less spectacular, effect can be observed by simply turning a tap on and observing the water stream at various flow rates.

Edited by studiot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, studiot said:

It is tempting to use the simple kinetic theory, which compares the single component phases of  liquids and gases (and solids) at conditions well away from the phase interface lines on the material phase diagram.

The closer to that line you get the closer the densities and molecular speeds converge, until they are equal on the line.

Magma is neither a single component nor a single phase material so its rheology is correspondingly complex.

There is also the transition from laminar flow to turbulent flow to consider in your example.
A similar, though less spectacular, effect can be observed by simply turning a tap on and observing the water stream at various flow rates.

Well, I don't think I understood any of that so I'll take your word for it. :)

Are you saying that velocities of molecules in gases and liquids are (approximately) the same (assuming they are at the same temperature)? 

Not sure how either magma or taps are directly relevant. Although, I suppose you would get a very different effect from dropping coloured water into a glass than you would by shooting a high speed jet of it. But then the question would be (to bring it back to the OP) would that be about the same for two liquids and two gases?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The molecules don’t go straight unless having enough velocity to push others out the way. What I’m trying to describe is the circular motion each gas and liquid on how it distributes it’s self. When I blow smoke it go in a shape of vortex kinda unless it has more velocity. Water will do the same thing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Jakewhothinks said:

When I blow smoke it go in a shape of vortex kinda unless it has more velocity. Water will do the same thing

Exactly. 

My intuition was that doing this with smoke would form a larger vortex than doing the same thing with (coloured) water. It seems I am wrong (which is always good to learn!)

The basic fluid dynamics (turbulent flow, etc) that create the vortex will be the same in all fluids.

Edited by Strange
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Jakewhothinks said:

The molecules don’t go straight unless having enough velocity to push others out the way. What I’m trying to describe is the circular motion each gas and liquid on how it distributes it’s self. When I blow smoke it go in a shape of vortex kinda unless it has more velocity. Water will do the same thing

Strange was correct, you are asking about the differences between the  fluid mechanics of liquids and the fluid mechanics of  gases.

 

To a first approximation the difference is that liquids are incompressible and gases are compressible.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.