franco malgarini Posted September 7, 2018 Share Posted September 7, 2018 Polonium 210 has a half-life of 140 days which is the time that can be used to make a power generator; just a few grams are needed to reach temperatures of 500 degrees centigrade sufficient to produce steam that drives a turbine; after 8 months it is no longer radioactive and therefore does not produce waste. It can be produced from bismuth by neutron irradiation; you can even build cars at Polonium 210. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frank Posted September 7, 2018 Share Posted September 7, 2018 Where does polonium come from and how much energy is needed to extract it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
franco malgarini Posted September 7, 2018 Author Share Posted September 7, 2018 Probably, Polonium 210 is transmutable from lead: i have an idea for it... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strange Posted September 7, 2018 Share Posted September 7, 2018 (edited) 39 minutes ago, franco malgarini said: after 8 months it is no longer radioactive Why do you think that? Edited September 7, 2018 by Strange Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sensei Posted September 7, 2018 Share Posted September 7, 2018 8 hours ago, franco malgarini said: It can be produced from bismuth by neutron irradiation; Bismuth relatively stable isotope is Bi-209. After neutron capture, it'll become Bi-210. Majority of it will beta decay minus to Po-210 with half-life 5.012(5) days. The question is where do you get enough free neutrons to make enough Po-210 fuel.. ? 1 gram of Po-210 is approximately 1 g / 210 g/mol = ~0.0047619 mol * 6.022141*10^23 = 2.86768619*10^21 atoms (and free (slow/thermal) neutrons required to make it). (too fast neutrons will destroy nucleus, and cause e.g. proton-emission) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Cuthber Posted September 8, 2018 Share Posted September 8, 2018 On 9/7/2018 at 2:17 PM, franco malgarini said: just a few grams That's tens of thousands of curies of radioactive material. Even if we ignore the terrorist threat from a dirty bomb, there's a huge risk of radioactive material leaking from a car crash. Why would anyone take the risks? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
franco malgarini Posted September 8, 2018 Author Share Posted September 8, 2018 Fukushima docet !!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strange Posted September 8, 2018 Share Posted September 8, 2018 28 minutes ago, franco malgarini said: Fukushima docet !!!! That teaches us that having radioactive materials in vulnerable places (eg in automobiles) is not a good idea. And can you answer my question: On 07/09/2018 at 2:34 PM, Strange said: Why do you think that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
franco malgarini Posted September 8, 2018 Author Share Posted September 8, 2018 one year, 12 months + -, the halftime is 142 days.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strange Posted September 8, 2018 Share Posted September 8, 2018 6 minutes ago, franco malgarini said: one year, 12 months + -, the halftime is 142 days.... What does this mean? can you answer my question: why do you think that “after 8 months it is no longer radioactive”? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
franco malgarini Posted September 8, 2018 Author Share Posted September 8, 2018 the half-life of a radioactive material is the time it takes to halve the amount of radioactive particles emitted; polonium 210 after 142 days has half of the alpha particles emitted; after eight months, a quarter, after 12 months an eighth, that is almost nothing. For example, the Thorium has 11 years of half-life, plutonium thousands of years' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strange Posted September 8, 2018 Share Posted September 8, 2018 (edited) 20 minutes ago, franco malgarini said: after 12 months an eighth, that is almost nothing 14 months. And I don't think that 1/8th (of an unspecified amount) is "nothing". The LD50 dose for Po 210 is about 1ug (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polonium) so if we take that as nothing, then your starting amount if 8ug. Is that enough to power anything useful? You said you needed "a few grams". Lets say, 5 grams. To reduce this to 1 ug would take over 22 years. And for most of that time it would be useless as a power source. Basically, like all your threads, you are just making stuff up without doing the most basic research. Edited September 8, 2018 by Strange Reference Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
franco malgarini Posted September 8, 2018 Author Share Posted September 8, 2018 You don't Know radioactivity.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strange Posted September 8, 2018 Share Posted September 8, 2018 4 minutes ago, franco malgarini said: You don't Know radioactivity.... Please explain where I have gone wrong? On 07/09/2018 at 2:17 PM, franco malgarini said: just a few grams are needed to reach temperatures of 500 degrees centigrade sufficient to produce steam that drives a turbine The temperature is not the important factor but the rate of energy release. Do you have any figures on that? On 07/09/2018 at 2:17 PM, franco malgarini said: It can be produced from bismuth by neutron irradiation On 07/09/2018 at 2:30 PM, franco malgarini said: Polonium 210 is transmutable from lead So, which is it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Cuthber Posted September 8, 2018 Share Posted September 8, 2018 According to the wiki page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polonium#Applications "Because of intense alpha radiation, a one-gram sample of 210Po will spontaneously heat up to above 500 °C (932 °F) generating about 140 watts of power. " So, getting a million watts will take 7kg of the stuff. So the assertion implied in the thread title is absurd. 5 hours ago, franco malgarini said: You don't Know radioactivity.... We do. You do not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sensei Posted September 8, 2018 Share Posted September 8, 2018 5 hours ago, Strange said: Please explain where I have gone wrong? 22 years * 365.25 day/year = 8035 days / 138.376 days/half-life = ~58 5 grams / 2^58 = ~1.735 *10^-17 grams.. 6 hours ago, Strange said: Lets say, 5 grams. To reduce this to 1 ug would take over 22 years. 22 half-lives, not 22 years. 5 g / 2^22 = ~1 ug. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strange Posted September 8, 2018 Share Posted September 8, 2018 (edited) 4 minutes ago, Sensei said: 22 half-lives, not 22 years. Doh. Of course. Thank you. So, about 8 years, 7 months. That's still a long time Edited September 8, 2018 by Strange Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Cuthber Posted September 9, 2018 Share Posted September 9, 2018 I suspect that the permitted body burden for 210 Po is a few orders of magnitude less than 1µg. The value I found online was 30 nano curies, or 6.8 pg. And you would need to start with roughly 10Kg to make a MW generator. Each SI prefix is about 10 half lives (2^10 is about a thousand) so A nanogram would be "safe" after 10 half lives a µg after 20, a mg after 30, a gram after 40 and a kg after about 50 half lives. Something like 18 years before the original 7 Kg that emits a megawatt decays to the 7pg or so that's a permitted body burden. This is of course a pointless discussion. World production of polonium is only of the order of 100 grams per year https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_world_production So it would take 100 years to make 10Kg, but that would have decayed about 82 years before you finished making it. This idea is dead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now