Antony Howard Stark Posted September 19, 2018 Share Posted September 19, 2018 Check this out first please . Well one of my friends brother who passed out class 10 wrote it. Is it correct or is it just a good attempt by a 15 yr old I know it's out of topic but since I've decided to discuss my so called theories on this forum I'd like it to start with this I'd be very obliged if you all could just review and express your views about the paper. A-New-Dimension-to-Time-Dilation-3 (1).pdf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strange Posted September 19, 2018 Share Posted September 19, 2018 3 hours ago, Antony Howard Stark said: Check this out first please . Well one of my friends brother who passed out class 10 wrote it. Is it correct or is it just a good attempt by a 15 yr old I know it's out of topic but since I've decided to discuss my so called theories on this forum I'd like it to start with this I'd be very obliged if you all could just review and express your views about the paper. A-New-Dimension-to-Time-Dilation-3 (1).pdf I will suggest the mods move this to the Speculations forum. Also note that you must present the idea here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Antony Howard Stark Posted September 19, 2018 Author Share Posted September 19, 2018 Speculation? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strange Posted September 19, 2018 Share Posted September 19, 2018 14 minutes ago, Antony Howard Stark said: Speculation? Well you said “my theories”. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Antony Howard Stark Posted September 19, 2018 Author Share Posted September 19, 2018 Sorry about that. Can we not just check it once and then argue ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strange Posted September 19, 2018 Share Posted September 19, 2018 13 minutes ago, Antony Howard Stark said: Sorry about that. Can we not just check it once and then argue ? You need to start a new thread Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Antony Howard Stark Posted September 19, 2018 Author Share Posted September 19, 2018 Come on its just wasting time. It is just a 4 page article just read it ones -1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strange Posted September 19, 2018 Share Posted September 19, 2018 25 minutes ago, Antony Howard Stark said: Come on its just wasting time. It is just a 4 page article just read it ones Why do you think the rules don’t apply to you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Antony Howard Stark Posted September 19, 2018 Author Share Posted September 19, 2018 By the way why isn't anyone else seeing this. They might just be better than you. Anyone there .? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swansont Posted September 19, 2018 Share Posted September 19, 2018 36 minutes ago, Antony Howard Stark said: Come on its just wasting time. It is just a 4 page article just read it ones ! Moderator Note If you want to discuss it here, you need to post it here — enough information for the discussion to proceed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Antony Howard Stark Posted September 19, 2018 Author Share Posted September 19, 2018 I already did that it's in the pdf. By the way what is a moderator note ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swansont Posted September 19, 2018 Share Posted September 19, 2018 15 minutes ago, Antony Howard Stark said: By the way what is a moderator note ? ! Moderator Note A note from a moderator. 15 minutes ago, Antony Howard Stark said: I already did that it's in the pdf. ! Moderator Note From rule 2.7: "members should be able to participate in the discussion without clicking any links or watching any videos." Not everyone has the ability to read files or watch videos on their device. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strange Posted September 19, 2018 Share Posted September 19, 2018 (edited) 5 hours ago, Antony Howard Stark said: I'd be very obliged if you all could just review and express your views about the paper. Are you going to defend this, even though you didn't write it? 1. What are the "loopholes" in the theory of relativity? 2. Do you [the author] understand the difference between (and the significance of) the speed of light in a vacuum being invariant, and the speed of light in a medium, which is not invariant (like anything else that moves with less than the speed of light)? 3. What are the "inaccuracies which have taken place in practically conducted experiments"? In summary, the paper has invented a non-existent problem to solve. A bit like asking if the speed of light is different if we paint the lab walls red instead of white. Edited September 19, 2018 by Strange clarity Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swansont Posted September 19, 2018 Share Posted September 19, 2018 There's a conceptual problem demonstrated in trying to extrapolate from a light clock behaving differently in atmosphere to this being a fundamental feature of atomic clocks. Which do not operate at atmospheric pressures, anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strange Posted September 20, 2018 Share Posted September 20, 2018 On 19/09/2018 at 10:21 AM, Antony Howard Stark said: Come on its just wasting time. It is just a 4 page article just read it ones You were very keen to discuss this yesterday. Why has it all gone quiet now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghideon Posted September 20, 2018 Share Posted September 20, 2018 (edited) I only have basic knowledge about relativity but thought it could be worth the time to check this out. The first part of the chapter INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND states: Quote In 1905 the great physicist albert eintstein[10] published his theory of general relativity[11,13,14,18] followed by his theory of time dilation (bold by me to highlight) Maybe just a minor thing but not a promising start. And it is then contradicted by the paper's first reference: Quote Miller, arthur i. (1981), albert einstein's special theory of relativity. emergence (1905) Unfortunately it does not look like this revision of the paper is worth spending time on. How was the paper reviewed? Edited September 20, 2018 by Ghideon spelling Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
studiot Posted September 20, 2018 Share Posted September 20, 2018 Er, I think 1905 was the special theory and 1915 or 1917 was the general theory. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strange Posted September 20, 2018 Share Posted September 20, 2018 Just now, Ghideon said: (bold by me to highlight) Maybe just a minor thing but not a promising start. And it is then contradicted by the paper's fist reference: Good catch! 20 minutes ago, Ghideon said: How was the paper reviewed? This doesn't look like a very prestigious journal. I wonder if he paid to have it published. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghideon Posted September 20, 2018 Share Posted September 20, 2018 1 hour ago, Strange said: I wonder if he paid to have it published. Probably, the fee may differ depending on country of residence: https://ijisrt.com/processing-charges Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strange Posted September 24, 2018 Share Posted September 24, 2018 On 19/09/2018 at 5:39 AM, Antony Howard Stark said: Check this out first please . Well one of my friends brother who passed out class 10 wrote it. Is it correct or is it just a good attempt by a 15 yr old I know it's out of topic but since I've decided to discuss my so called theories on this forum I'd like it to start with this I'd be very obliged if you all could just review and express your views about the paper. A-New-Dimension-to-Time-Dilation-3 (1).pdf You were very keen to discuss this earlier. Do you have any response to the comments so far? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now