quiet Posted October 7, 2018 Posted October 7, 2018 (edited) \lim_{\left(n \rightarrow \infty \right)} \sum_{i=1}^{i=n} i= - \dfrac{1}{12} I've seen it on the next page. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1_%2B_2_%2B_3_%2B_4_%2B_⋯ Edited October 7, 2018 by quiet
taeto Posted October 7, 2018 Posted October 7, 2018 (edited) It is a meme, see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meme The fact is that \sum_{n=1}^\infty n^{-s} is convergent for every complex number s with \mbox{Re}\ s > 1. But the function that maps s to \sum_{n=1}^\infty n^{-s} is only defined for \mbox{Re}\ s > 1. So there is another function, called the Riemann zeta function \zeta which is defined for all complex numbers except 1, which is a pole. The Riemann zeta function satisfies \zeta(s) = \sum_{n=1}^\infty n^{-s} for all complex values s with \mbox{Re}\ s > 1, but not elsewhere. The value of \zeta(-1) happens to be -1/12. For s=-1 the expression \sum_{n=1}^\infty n^{-s} makes no sense. Edited October 7, 2018 by taeto 1
quiet Posted October 7, 2018 Author Posted October 7, 2018 If I say that the equation of my initial note is wrong, am I telling the truth?
taeto Posted October 7, 2018 Posted October 7, 2018 On 10/7/2018 at 7:46 PM, quiet said: If I say that the equation of my initial note is wrong, am I telling the truth? Expand Yes, the truth is that the limit does not exist. 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now