quiet Posted October 7, 2018 Posted October 7, 2018 (edited) [math] \lim_{\left(n \rightarrow \infty \right)} \sum_{i=1}^{i=n} i= - \dfrac{1}{12} [/math] I've seen it on the next page. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1_%2B_2_%2B_3_%2B_4_%2B_⋯ Edited October 7, 2018 by quiet
taeto Posted October 7, 2018 Posted October 7, 2018 (edited) It is a meme, see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meme The fact is that [math]\sum_{n=1}^\infty n^{-s}[/math] is convergent for every complex number [math]s[/math] with [math]\mbox{Re}\ s > 1[/math]. But the function that maps [math]s[/math] to [math]\sum_{n=1}^\infty n^{-s}[/math] is only defined for [math]\mbox{Re}\ s > 1[/math]. So there is another function, called the Riemann zeta function [math]\zeta[/math] which is defined for all complex numbers except [math]1[/math], which is a pole. The Riemann zeta function satisfies [math]\zeta(s) = \sum_{n=1}^\infty n^{-s}[/math] for all complex values [math]s[/math] with [math]\mbox{Re}\ s > 1[/math], but not elsewhere. The value of [math]\zeta(-1)[/math] happens to be [math]-1/12[/math]. For [math]s=-1[/math] the expression [math]\sum_{n=1}^\infty n^{-s}[/math] makes no sense. Edited October 7, 2018 by taeto 1
quiet Posted October 7, 2018 Author Posted October 7, 2018 If I say that the equation of my initial note is wrong, am I telling the truth?
taeto Posted October 7, 2018 Posted October 7, 2018 14 minutes ago, quiet said: If I say that the equation of my initial note is wrong, am I telling the truth? Yes, the truth is that the limit does not exist. 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now