Rajiv Naik Posted November 24, 2018 Share Posted November 24, 2018 On 19/08/2018 at 10:40 PM, Achilles said: So for magnetism we have earths magnetic field, that occurs naturally Electricity we have lightning We have electromagnetic waves come from the sun That covers electromagnetism I think What about the other 3 fundamental interaction of nature according to my reading- why electricity is treated independently?- its part of electromagnetism. electrons are basically waves with perticular energy- there is only one electron wave and what observed as an individual electron is local stationary particle of the electron wave field . its like when we measure average tempature of room as X, its an average of many particles in room with different temperatures x1, x2,x3.... etc. gluons are the forces which hold all elementary particles togather. decay should involve chaos and thermodynamics . everything ultimately evaporates as a radiation. its suspected that gravity may be due to gluons - but fundamentaly is a force created by spin. its propertional to product of masses involved and inversely proportional to square ofdistance between the masses. Clearly indicating that its a force which is related to angular momentum of Mass- or a spin. therefore I feel that its a centrifugal force. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
studiot Posted November 24, 2018 Share Posted November 24, 2018 (edited) 2 hours ago, Rajiv Naik said: therefore I feel that its a centrifugal force. Centrifugal forces are a mathematical trick or device to put calculation in a more convienient form. They are not 'real' forces. The trick involves transformation of the analysis of a particular situation from a dynamic one to a static equilibrium one. As with all such transformations, at the end of the process, the cost of the easier mathematics is the fact you have to perform the reverse transformation. There are other such imaginary forces and other types of transformation. Edited November 24, 2018 by studiot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strange Posted November 24, 2018 Share Posted November 24, 2018 2 hours ago, Rajiv Naik said: its suspected that gravity may be due to gluons Suspected by who? Please provide a reference. 2 hours ago, Rajiv Naik said: but fundamentaly is a force created by spin. its propertional to product of masses involved and inversely proportional to square ofdistance between the masses. Clearly indicating that its a force which is related to angular momentum of Mass- or a spin. As spin does not appear in that equation it is obviously not related. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swansont Posted November 24, 2018 Share Posted November 24, 2018 ! Moderator Note Rajiv Naik, please stop posting your assertions in the main physics forums. You are not relaying accepted physics, and responses must be based on mainstream science. Posting pet theories in mainstream discussion is considered thread hijacking. If you think you are using accepted physics, I'm sorry to say that you are doing a very poor job. You should be asking questions to correct your knowledge, rather than trying to provide answers. 5 hours ago, Rajiv Naik said: its like when we measure average tempature of room as X, its an average of many particles in room with different temperatures x1, x2,x3.... etc. There is no temperature of a single particle. Temperature is defined only for a group of particles. 5 hours ago, Rajiv Naik said: gluons are the forces which hold all elementary particles togather. Only the ones subject to the strong interaction. 5 hours ago, Rajiv Naik said: its suspected that gravity may be due to gluons - but fundamentaly is a force created by spin. its propertional to product of masses involved and inversely proportional to square ofdistance between the masses. Clearly indicating that its a force which is related to angular momentum of Mass- or a spin. therefore I feel that its a centrifugal force. Uh, no. But if you feel that this is so, you must present a testable model that shows it to be so, or some other sort of evidence. Not just hand-wavy assertions, and not based on what you feel is the case. This is supposed to be science. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now