Jump to content

space shuttle


ydoaPs

Recommended Posts

i would like to see NASA go since all they are doing is wasting our tax money on "demonstrator" aircraft and using a shuttle thats almost 30 years old.

heck i made some models at home that are some pretty good concepts to replace the shuttle

 

Burt Rutan will get us to the moon and beyond....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Hubble needs some work on the gyro's (or something) in '07 or '08 max. Even if ISS *is* a white elephant' date=' I believe they'll continue to support it.

[/quote']

 

The Hubble won't be getting another call from the shuttle even under the current plan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not convinced Rutan will solve the problem of re-entry at > 17,000 mph as easily as he handled the problem of "re-entry" at < 3,000 mph. Try that little "feather" trick at that kind of speed, and I imagine Mother Nature will just point and laugh.

 

But he certainly seems to have a better shot at it than anybody else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

oo, suborbit....so impressive...

Yes, I think it was. When compared to the manpower and money used for the first NASA manned shots.

 

Sort of like a backyard builder making a 12 seater passenger plane. Not very impressive compared to a Jumbo, but quite an achievement in it's own right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont see how this foam falling off the tanks is such a huge problem for NASA. There has to be a solution. Maybe a different material. Maybe a stronger, more flexible adhesive will work (that is, if the foam is glued on).

 

What are other countries doing right that we aren't. They don't seem to be having this problem.

 

Will someone please explain to me why this is so difficult to solve!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes' date=' I think it was. When compared to the manpower and money used for the first NASA manned shots.

 

Sort of like a backyard builder making a 12 seater passenger plane. Not very impressive compared to a Jumbo, but quite an achievement in it's own right.[/quote']

Rutan had access to info on NASA's first shots. NASA didn't have anything to go on when they did it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But NASA's *non*-involvement in Rutan's project is a big part of why it happened at all. There's no way NASA would ever approve a vehicle without triple redundancy on every safety system, and a hell of a lot more safety systems than SpaceShip One has. There are single points of failure all over the place in that thing.

 

Not that it's really NASA's fault, I suppose. We just wouldn't view the failure of a routine space tourism flight in the same way that we view failures by the space shuttle. Private developers not only get to avoid government oversight, they also get to avoid all the emotional baggage. All they have to worry about is their OWN public image (i.e. nobody may want to fly with them if one of their vehicles crashes).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.