Michael F. D. Posted June 30, 2003 Share Posted June 30, 2003 A notion "time" has been arised at everyday life of people for indication of occurring events and periodic changes in life and surrounding their world. We can observe the existence of time on occurring changes or at events only. For orientation at time, people are using the reiterative events, such as the orbiting of moon, a rising of sun or the sundown, tide of water on seeshore, and a clock, later. Thereby, the CYCLES this is an integral, main characteristic of time. Each object in universe (the universe also) has the inherent to him Time Cycle (TC). Indeed, time shows itself as TC of object. What starts all events? I claim - the time. Since the time contains necessary information and energy for realization of events. This a strange at first thought conclusion, I can motivate by using mathematical transformation and logic . For these purposes, I use known mass-energy relation: E=mc^2 (1) Here c is a speed of light. If we speak of speed, in any event, this means the attitude of the way s to time t. So, c=s/t (2) Bearing in mind c=const this attitude defines "the linear expansion of space " in accordance with the existing "analog" (non digital) theory. Having substitute (2) in (1) we get: E=m(s/t)^2 (3) Whence t=s/sqrt(E/m) (4) or t=s (sqrt m/sqrt E) (5) That can we see? Obviously that time has a complex structure and contains the space, energy and mass (information) . SPACE, MASS And ENERGY EXISTS AT TIME ONLY. TIME CYCLE is the UNIVERSAL SOURCE and a SINGLE ACTOR OF ALL EVENTS for ANY OBJECT. It is A PROGRAMM of EXISTENCE . © 2003 Michael F. Dmitriyev Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Radical Edward Posted June 30, 2003 Share Posted June 30, 2003 moved to pseudoscience Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael F. D. Posted June 30, 2003 Author Share Posted June 30, 2003 Originally posted by Radical Edward moved to pseudoscience The traditional "Whut?" is absent. So, I do not see the reasons for such displacement of my topic. Your explanation? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greg1917 Posted June 30, 2003 Share Posted June 30, 2003 Moderators do need explanation, they need only to moderate, for it is in this very moderation an explanation can be found. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael F. D. Posted July 1, 2003 Author Share Posted July 1, 2003 What about my thread? I am waiting the replies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sayonara Posted July 1, 2003 Share Posted July 1, 2003 Originally posted by Michael F. D. What about my thread? I am waiting the replies. Statements without evidence are pseudoscience, no matter how convenient the train of thought. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greg1917 Posted July 1, 2003 Share Posted July 1, 2003 He copyrighted it, therefore it must be correct and official. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sayonara Posted July 2, 2003 Share Posted July 2, 2003 Originally posted by greg1917 He copyrighted it, therefore it must be correct and official. He needn't have bothered. Bollocks doesn't get plagiarised by anyone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now