anne242 Posted January 24, 2019 Share Posted January 24, 2019 (edited) Godel's 2nd theorem ends in paradox Godel's 2nd theorem is about SPAM LINK DELETED "If an axiomatic system can be proven to be consistent and complete from within itself, then it is inconsistent.” But we have a paradox Gödel is using a mathematical system his theorem says a system cant be proven consistent THUS A PARADOX Godel must prove that a system cannot be proven to be consistent based upon the premise that the logic he uses must be consistent . If the logic he uses is not consistent then he cannot make a proof that is consistent. So he must assume that his logic is consistent so he can make a proof of the impossibility of proving a system to be consistent. But if his proof is true then he has proved that the logic he uses to make the proof must be consistent, but his proof proves that this cannot be done THUS A PARADOX Edited January 24, 2019 by Strange Link deleted Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strange Posted January 24, 2019 Share Posted January 24, 2019 ! Moderator Note Stop spamming your blog. I don't think we need more one thread open to demonstrate your profound ignorance of mathematics so I am locking this one 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts