swansont Posted February 14, 2019 Posted February 14, 2019 The thing about the light clock is that it does not rely on any mechanism that one can argue is affected by the motion. One of the recurring misconceptions is that somehow time dilation is a mechanical effect on the workings of the clock. The light clock suffers from no such confusion. The effect is solely due to the limitation that photons move at c in all inertial frames. So if you think there is a flaw in the model, point it out. But let's dispense with silly guessing games.
beecee Posted February 14, 2019 Posted February 14, 2019 On 2/13/2019 at 5:11 PM, Randall Canham said: Endy0816 You have still not refuted my claim that time is just a basic measuring tool that even you must admit to using . To even just to establish a velocity. Or have you never used this method to do so. Obviously there may be other ways but that is not my point. Thanks No, a clock is a basic measuring tool...It measures time...how much time has passed between successive events. Time is there, it exists, just as space exists. 1
hypervalent_iodine Posted February 15, 2019 Posted February 15, 2019 ! Moderator Note Randall Canham, since it seems apparent you have no intention of being anything less than vague, and since this forum requires you to be precise and to support your ideas with proof and evidence, this thread is closed. You are not permitted to reintroduce it. 1
Recommended Posts