ydoaPs Posted July 29, 2005 Posted July 29, 2005 what the hell is your "immensely deep knowledge?" ooo, i can prove that an imaginary creature created the universe by using logical fallacys edit: post #2,345
herme3 Posted July 29, 2005 Posted July 29, 2005 what the hell is your "immensely deep knowledge?" ooo' date=' i can prove that an imaginary creature created the universe by using logical fallacys[/quote'] It is the knowledge that you believe is fallacies because you can't comprehend it. Read Sorcerorston's post: Some people are merely so wrapped in their "science" that they cannot fathom anything that is beyond their comprehension' date=' such as the majesty that is the supreme being. If it is not quantifible by their flawed and incomplete physics or biology or other incomplete sciences they automatically judge it as falsehood. It is the thinking of primitives who cannot see past their own subjective and prejudice minds to see the true grandeur and beauty of the holographic universe that was created by the one true surpeme being.[/quote']
ydoaPs Posted July 29, 2005 Posted July 29, 2005 no, it is a fallacy, because it is a fallacy, not because we can't understand you. you two are morons.
sorcerorston Posted July 29, 2005 Posted July 29, 2005 Well young man you have the mind of a Cavia porcellus. You are simply not ready to comprehend all i have said. Take a cue from Herme3. And just so you know I have forgotten more than you will ever know, which is why i'm a congressman and you're not.
herme3 Posted July 29, 2005 Posted July 29, 2005 no, it is a fallacy, because it is a fallacy, not because we can't understand you. you two are morons. You obviously don't understand us. The thought of a supreme being with unlimited powers is something you can't understand. You can't understand it because you don't have unlimited powers. You think that just because you can't create a universe, God can't either. That is a fallacy.
ydoaPs Posted July 29, 2005 Posted July 29, 2005 Take a cue from Herme3. And just so you know I have forgotten more than you will ever know' date=' which is why i'm a congressman and you're not.[/quote'] well, i am a nuclear physicist and an ordained minister. what is your point?
LucidDreamer Posted July 29, 2005 Posted July 29, 2005 Well young man you have the mind of a Cavia porcellus. You are simply not ready to comprehend all i have said. Take a cue from Herme3. And just so you know I have forgotten more than you will ever know' date=' which is why i'm a congressman and you're not.[/quote'] Ah, doubt that, but it would explain the sad state of affairs of our government.
ydoaPs Posted July 29, 2005 Posted July 29, 2005 You obviously don't understand us. The thought of a supreme being with unlimited powers is something you can't understand. You can't understand it because you don't have unlimited powers. You think that just because you can't create a universe, God can't either. That is a fallacy. no, it isn't a fallacy. do you even know what a fallacy is?
sorcerorston Posted July 29, 2005 Posted July 29, 2005 well, i am a nuclear physicist and an ordained minister. what is your point? The point is many people believe i am capable of delivering their views and creating the laws of this land, that's the point young man. you're the reason why children need to learn creationism in school, so maybe they have a little respect for their elders when they understand that man is not the ultimate judge.
ydoaPs Posted July 29, 2005 Posted July 29, 2005 you sir, need a straightjacket. ok, how did God create light? he had yet to create a medium for sound when he spoke "let there be light."
herme3 Posted July 29, 2005 Posted July 29, 2005 no, it isn't a fallacy.[/url'] do you even know what a fallacy is? Yes it is. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_ignorance The point is many people believe i am capable of delivering their views and creating the laws of this land, that's the point young man. you're the reason why children need to learn creationism in school, so maybe they have a little respect for their elders when they understand that man is not the ultimate judge. I agree with everything that you say. Please don't worry about Yourdadonapogos's insults. He is obviously not capable of understand our beliefs.
ydoaPs Posted July 29, 2005 Posted July 29, 2005 i never said an imaginary creature couldn't create the universe because i couldn't. i understand your beliefs just fine. it's funny how you can't answer my question.
herme3 Posted July 29, 2005 Posted July 29, 2005 The fact that you are calling God an "imaginary creature" is proof that you don't understand our beliefs.
Dak Posted July 29, 2005 Posted July 29, 2005 You obviously don't understand us. The thought of a supreme being with unlimited powers is something you can't understand. You can't understand it because you don't have unlimited powers. You think that just because you can't create a universe, God can't either. That is a fallacy. we can all understand it. but, just because we can understand it, doesnt mean that its true. i think that was yourdadonapogos' point -- that we can also comprehend pink fairies, but that in-and-of itself doesnt mean that pink faries exist. the lack of acceptance of the existance of god by some of us is not due to incomprehension. it is a matter of belief. anyway, personally i cant understand phisics, french, or local computer-networking, but i acknowledge that they all exist.
elfstone Posted July 29, 2005 Posted July 29, 2005 The point is many people believe i am capable of delivering their views and creating the laws of this land, that's the point young man. you're the reason why children need to learn creationism in school, so maybe they have a little respect for their elders when they understand that man is not the ultimate judge. So, what kind of scientific authority do you have as a congressman? None. Respect is earned and you have to try a lot harder than arrogantly declaring you are right in a science forum. I am not surprised but it's terrifying to be reminded that men like you make the laws. This is why the world is in such a mess.
JPQuiceno Posted July 29, 2005 Posted July 29, 2005 Oh my Herme3. Please tell me, can you prove god created the universe? All the bible says is that god created the universe with his words. There is no proof of this. NONE whatsoever. God never explains how he did. Second, I want to point out that weak arguement that you give. "well, you cant understand god because he has allmighty powers and you arent therefore you cant understand him". ****. Mother ****. HOW MANY TIMES DO WE HAVE TO TELL YOU, A god with almighty powers IS AN ILLOGICAL IDEA. It goes against the laws of phyisics, against logic and is EXTREMLY ILLOGICAL IN ITSELF. The "All Mighty" God from the bible DOES NOT exist. He is ILLOGICAL, goes against scientific laws, and gives no explanation for him creating the universe.
zyncod Posted July 29, 2005 Posted July 29, 2005 Ummm... Why is a congressman insulting people on a webforum? Way to go get those votes, sorcerorston. And I have never met anybody that actually believes in God. I have, however, met a whole lot of people that believe what everybody else believes in the little corner of America where they grew up. Then again, most religious people I know are Catholic and it is literally impossible to be Catholic and believe in God.
herme3 Posted July 29, 2005 Posted July 29, 2005 HOW MANY TIMES DO WE HAVE TO TELL YOU' date=' A god with almighty powers IS AN ILLOGICAL IDEA. It goes against the laws of phyisics, against logic and is EXTREMLY ILLOGICAL IN ITSELF. The "All Mighty" God from the bible DOES NOT exist. He is ILLOGICAL, goes against scientific laws, and gives no explanation for him creating the universe.[/quote'] There is nothing illogical about God having almighty powers. He designed the laws of physics, not you. If he wanted you to have unlimited powers, he would have given them to you. However, he didn't. Therefore you are restricted to the laws of Physics, while God is not. God has chosen to keep himself hidden from us, except through religion. That does not make God illogical since he has unlimited powers. He is only beyond your comprehension. Read this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_ignorance
Cap'n Refsmmat Posted July 29, 2005 Posted July 29, 2005 YOU are beyond my comprehension. Anyways, can you substantiate any single claim in that last post, or are you simply making statements with no evidence to hold them together at all?
Phi for All Posted July 29, 2005 Posted July 29, 2005 Let's all remember that this thread is in Evolution, an established scientific branch. Let's also remember that ad hominem is also a logical fallacy; no more name calling, please. Evolution is not interested in spiritual beliefs, neither supporting them nor denying them. Please keep this thread on track, since, if it begins to dip towards spirituality or spontaneous creation without factual evidence to back it up, it will be moved to Religion or Pseudoscience respectively.
Cap'n Refsmmat Posted July 29, 2005 Posted July 29, 2005 Suggested reading for herme3: http://www.deathtocreationism.com/content/node/9 Before you can tell us macroevolution is impossible, you'd need to refute that article.
JPQuiceno Posted July 29, 2005 Posted July 29, 2005 There is nothing illogical about God having almighty powers. He designed the laws of physics' date=' not you. If he wanted you to have unlimited powers, he would have given them to you. However, he didn't. Therefore you are restricted to the laws of Physics, while God is not. God has chosen to keep himself hidden from us, except through religion. That does not make God illogical since he has unlimited powers. He is only beyond your comprehension. Read this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_ignorance[/quote'] How dare you say im ignorant without using facts to show that im ignorant? Anyhow I will show how you are USING FACTS. You say that god isnt illogical. Well, if he did design the laws of physics, please show me how he did and some proof of it. Wait, are you going to resort to the same tactic every other creationist does, saying that "god just created the universe. thats that." Because you said that I was ignorant because I said that god defys the laws of logic and physics IN WHICH HE DOES. Then you proceeded to say that he does, but since he created the laws of physics, that he does not have to adhere to them. Please, show me some proof of god creating the laws of physics, hell, why not show me proof of him creating anything. And second, if you say god created logic, and the laws of phyics, don't you think it would be kind of stupid for him to make laws that he himself defies, and that makes him defy the only thing that man has to reason, which is logic? It sure does seem so to me.
ydoaPs Posted July 30, 2005 Posted July 30, 2005 herme3, why don't you score your deep knowledge? http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/crackpot.html edit: do it for all of your threads where you have been told it is rubbish and you say "you don't understand" or "that isn't the answer i'm looking for"
Recommended Posts